Senators: Benghazi attack ‘likely preventable’

Truth Detector said:
Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi

Issa and Chaffetz say they’ve “been told repeatedly” that the Obama administration not only “repeatedly reject(ed) requests for increased security despite escalating violence, but it also systematically decreased existing security to dangerous and ineffective levels,” and did so “to effectuate a policy of ‘normalization’ in Libya after the conclusion of its civil war.”

The truth contained in this paragraph cannot be diminished:

This “normalization,” the GOP congressman write, “appeared to have been aimed at conveying the impression that the situation in Libya was getting better, not worse. The administration’s decision to normalize was the basis for systematically withdrawing security personnel and equipment – including a much-needed DC-3 aircraft – without taking into account the reality on the ground. In an interview with Mr. Nordstrom, he maintained that the State Department routinely made decisions about security in early 2012 without first consulting him.” The congressmen submit ten questions for the president to answer.

But again, dunces like you wish to pretend that such decisions are not made with the knowledge of the President or the Secretary of Defense; underlings were all acting out on their own without any direction. ::wink wink::

Would you take Hillary's word?


Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated on Monday that she is responsible for the security of American diplomatic outposts. The comments by Clinton were made in response to the political firestorm that has surrounded the attack on the Benghazi, Libya US Consulate on September 11.

Clinton stated during a visit to Peru that she “take responsibility” for the protection of US diplomats, but added that an investigation is currently under way that will ultimately determine exactly what happened during the attack that killed four Americans last month, according to CNN.

Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/364797/hil...r-poor-benghazi-security/#IiGkeFQ13tyjVomR.99
Click to expand...


If you didn't have any evidence that Hillary was directly involved in the decision to not beef us security, why didn't you simply refrain from spamming the board with all this stuff that does NOT answer the question?
 
maineman said:
If you didn't have any evidence that Hillary was directly involved in the decision to not beef us security, why didn't you simply refrain from spamming the board with all this stuff that does NOT answer the question?
Click to expand...

Why don't you just admit you're a lying deceitful bootlicker and stop playing games.
 
you have none. I kinda wish you did, however... that might make your steady stream of insult-only posts perhaps a little bit interesting.
 
I don't lie, and no one is my master. pissbrain.

when are you gonna move beyond insults? Can we expect that to happen anytime soon?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top