Senate approves historic legislation to protect same-sex marriages

[Earl]

Abortion has been around forever. It was never a problem until the Christian taliban made it one. States should not have the power to legislate personal harmless choice and make it a crime.

It’s not harmless to the unborn infant who is murdered.

There never was an enumerated right for abortion in the Constitution.

All those tens of millions of infants who were murdered under Roe were murdered under a false interpretation of the Constitution.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

and what, exactly, is that truth?

what "marriage" has always, and still, means......

 

[SmarterthanYou]

what "marriage" has always, and still, means......

would you be more specific, please? Like who defines it, why it's defined that way, etc.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

That two men or two women marrying each other is an abomination.

in whose eyes?

The legalization of perversion and deviancy.

what part of the Constitution gives any government entity the power to legislate morality?

 

[Earl]

in whose eyes?


what part of the Constitution gives any government entity the power to legislate morality?

The eyes of God.

Government just legislated morality with the immoral ruling that a man can marry a man.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

would you be more specific, please? Like who defines it, why it's defined that way, etc.

all of society, a few thousand years.....

 

[SmarterthanYou]

The eyes of God.

Laws in this nation are not written by God, but by Man............so the eyes of God are irrelevant in anything but the church.

Government just legislated morality with the immoral ruling that a man can marry a man.

which is just another example of why governments should not be in the business of dictating the daily activities of people.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

all of society, a few thousand years.....

that isn't an answer, that's just an acceptance of traditional history. resting your hat on that as an answer says some things about your ability to think for yourself

 

[Monad Portal]

in whose eyes?


what part of the Constitution gives any government entity the power to legislate morality?

all laws are premised on some kind of morality.

morality is rational not necessarily religious....

do you acccept laws against murder as a valid function of government? that's morality of a sort.

 

[Earl]

Laws in this nation are not written by God, but by Man............so the eyes of God are irrelevant in anything but the church.


which is just another example of why governments should not be in the business of dictating the daily activities of people.

You asked, “in whose eyes.”

I answered you.

Many of our laws are based on Biblical mandates, the Ten Commandments.”

 

[Earl]

that isn't an answer, that's just an acceptance of traditional history. resting your hat on that as an answer says some things about your ability to think for yourself

Calling yourself “Smarterthanyou” says some things about your ability to think for yourself.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

that isn't an answer, that's just an acceptance of traditional history. resting your hat on that as an answer says some things about your ability to think for yourself

lol...no....pretending something is not real and that you can think for yourself is fine.......until you start passing laws that everyone needs to pay attention to what YOU have decided to think for yourself.......by ignoring what the demmycunts have decided IS thinking for myself.....you are the one who has surrendered to lib'rul hive thought.......

 

[SmarterthanYou]

all laws are premised on some kind of morality.

morality is rational not necessarily religious....

do you acccept laws against murder as a valid function of government? that's morality of a sort.

morality is subjective...........and yes, rational. The laws that surround morality should only be aimed at preventing harm to others.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

You asked, “in whose eyes.”

I answered you.

Many of our laws are based on Biblical mandates, the Ten Commandments.”

they align with them, but are not based on them. many people who do believe in God still kill. They still covet and commit adultery.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Calling yourself “Smarterthanyou” says some things about your ability to think for yourself.

volumes, I would say. especially when it concerns the likes of you.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

lol...no....pretending something is not real and that you can think for yourself is fine.......until you start passing laws that everyone needs to pay attention to what YOU have decided to think for yourself.......by ignoring what the demmycunts have decided IS thinking for myself.....you are the one who has surrendered to lib'rul hive thought.......

the last 14 years here, even the last few months, should show you the stupidity of your belief about my surrendering.............That it hasn't, that you've fallen prone to doing the same exact thing that the lib'ruls here do tells us all that you don't think for yourself, that you just react.

 

[Earl]

they align with them, but are not based on them. many people who do believe in God still kill. They still covet and commit adultery.

No, they are based on them.

The fact that many people who do believe in God still kill, covet and commit adultery is meaningless. They have violated God’s mandates and those who marry the same sex have violated God’s mandates.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

No, they are based on them.

The fact that many people who do believe in God still kill, covet and commit adultery is meaningless. They have violated God’s mandates and those who marry the same sex have violated God’s mandates.

and is it a requirement of civilization to follow all of Gods laws/mandates?

 

[Earl]

volumes, I would say. especially when it concerns the likes of you.

“Smart,” having or showing a quick-witted intelligence.

Your name is a misnomer, pendejo.

 

[Earl]

and is it a requirement of civilization to follow all of Gods laws/mandates?

Yes, pendejo.