Seattle Announces $15 Minimum Wage, Highest In The U.S.!!!

I find that, more often than not, the error is made by the person assembling the burger/hoagie and not the person taking the order. So I think the pickle troubles will persist in the cashierless McDonald's utopia.
 
Bonestorm said:
And I'd love to see who you're purporting to quote there, Damo.
Click to expand...
Each time you pretend you've "caught" me you find out that my memory serves well.

http://www.denverpost.com/marijuana/ci_24919628/colo-wont-ban-public-assistance-at-pot-shops
(A nice liberal source for you there...)
Democrats on the committee said some neighborhoods have few ATMs, and the Legislature should address those banking deserts before piling on places where public assistance cards can't be used.

"I'm not comfortable limiting that access until I'm certain we've done that due diligence to make sure people can access their benefits when they need to," Sen. Irene Aguilar, D-Denver, said.
Click to expand...

I know you like it better when I say I'm paraphrasing... but I don't post here to please you. It really is what this idiots "believe"... They are so stuck in "grow the program" that they can't do the right thing when it is obvious.

I personally do not see why they should be able to pull cash out of cards that are supposed to limit how you can spend the money to begin with.
 
Abraxas said:
So what are they buying then, breast milk?
Click to expand...

Sure. If that's what you want to believe. There will always be plenty of poor people we give money to that will spend money at the local burger joint as well as people who earn money who spend it there. Even if they have to order through a touch screen. The only thing this does, is take away jobs from people you believe need them the most.
 
Damocles said:
Each time you pretend you've "caught" me you find out that my memory serves well.

http://www.denverpost.com/marijuana/ci_24919628/colo-wont-ban-public-assistance-at-pot-shops
(A nice liberal source for you there...)
Click to expand...

So you were quoting no one. Thanks. That's what I thought. Not only does your memory suck, but your memory of your memory sucks.


Damocles said:
I know you like it better when I say I'm paraphrasing... but I don't post here to please you. It really is what this idiots "believe"... They are so stuck in "grow the program" that they can't do the right thing when it is obvious.

I personally do not see why they should be able to pull cash out of cards that are supposed to limit how you can spend the money to begin with.
Click to expand...

Yes, I like it when your posts conform to the norms of the language. If you aren't quoting someone, don't put words in quotes. I don't mind if you paraphrase. But then don't use quotes.
 
Bonestorm said:
So you were quoting no one. Thanks. That's what I thought. Not only does your memory suck, but your memory of your memory sucks.




Yes, I like it when your posts conform to the norms of the language. If you aren't quoting someone, don't put words in quotes. I don't mind if you paraphrase. But then don't use quotes.
Click to expand...
Again, I'm not here to please you. After all these years you know my style and know that it isn't likely to change, get over yourself.

The paraphrase was accurate, these idiots really believe that in PoorPeoplistan there are magical places where there is no way to get cash but MJ shops and strip clubs and we might "unnecessarily limit" somebody's access to our money. Answer this one: If there are no places to legally spend money limited to specific types of purchases (EBT cards are limited to grocery, etc), why would they need to be able to get cash in a place like PoorPeoplistan where only MJ shops and Strip Clubs exist? Tell me all about how if there is no gas station they need the cash to go to the gas station....
 
Damocles said:
Again, I'm not here to please you. After all these years you know my style and know that it isn't likely to change, get over yourself.
Click to expand...

If your grammar teacher couldn't fix it, I'm not likely to either. But, I'll continue to do it.


Damocles said:
The paraphrase was accurate, these idiots really believe that in PoorPeoplistan there are magical places where there is no way to get cash but MJ shops and strip clubs and we might "unnecessarily limit" somebody's access to our money. Answer this one: If there are no places to legally spend money limited to specific types of purchases, why would they need to be able to get cash?
Click to expand...

It wasn't a paraphrase. You purported to quote someone.

I'd answer your question if it was comprehensible, but it isn't. Answer this: if the cards can be used to take out cash, who gives a shit where the cash is accessed?
 
Bonestorm said:
If your grammar teacher couldn't fix it, I'm not likely to either. But, I'll continue to do it.




It wasn't a paraphrase. You purported to quote someone.
Click to expand...
Which doesn't change the accuracy of meaning. As I said, I don't care how pedantic you are in correcting simple grammar, pretending it is a meaningful rebuttal of the point is just laziness on your part. It isn't, in fact that kind of nonsense is a non sequitur, a logical fallacy.

I'd answer your question if it was comprehensible, but it isn't. Answer this: if the cards can be used to take out cash, who gives a shit where the cash is accessed?
Click to expand...

It was comprehensible, if you made any effort.

And I'll answer your question, as I did before, I don't think they should be able to get cash from these cards at all, let alone using the excuse that cards that are supposed to limit HOW you can spend the money need to be accessible in areas where none of the items you are limited to can be found.

For instance in magical PoorPeoplistan where the MJ shops and strip clubs are plentiful but there are no grocery stores why should a card limited to specifically grocery items be accessible at all?
 
Damocles said:
Which doesn't change the accuracy of meaning. As I said, I don't care how pedantic you are in correcting simple grammar, pretending it is a meaningful rebuttal of the point is just laziness on your part. It isn't, in fact that kind of nonsense is a non sequitur, a logical fallacy.
Click to expand...

It's pretty simple, Damo. If you put words in quotes, I'm going to assume you are quoting someone and will continue to ask for the source of the quote.


Damocles said:
It was comprehensible. And I'll answer your question, as I did before, I don't think they should be able to get cash from these cards.
Click to expand...

I couldn't understand it. Maybe try again. And you're not answering my question. You're answering a different question.
 
Bonestorm said:
It's pretty simple, Damo. If you put words in quotes, I'm going to assume you are quoting someone and will continue to ask for the source of the quote.
Click to expand...
Which again is a lazy. It's silly.


I couldn't understand it. Maybe try again. And you're not answering my question. You're answering a different question.
Click to expand...
I answered your question. I don't think they should be able to get cash from them, then I gave you the reason I think that. You should make an attempt to engage your brain while you read in some way other than OCD grammar nazi "witticisms".

I don't think they should be able to get cash from these cards at all, let alone using the excuse that cards that are supposed to limit HOW you can spend the money need to be accessible in areas where none of the items you are limited to can be found.

For instance in magical PoorPeoplistan where the MJ shops and strip clubs are plentiful but there are no grocery stores. In such a pakce why should a card limited to specifically grocery items be accessible at all?
 
Damocles said:
Which again is a lazy. It's silly.
Click to expand...

Using quotation marks when you ain't quoting is silly.


Damocles said:
I answered your question. I don't think they should be able to get cash from them, then I gave you the reason I think that. You should make an attempt to engage your brain while you read in some way other than OCD grammar nazi "witticisms".

I don't think they should be able to get cash from these cards at all, let alone using the excuse that cards that are supposed to limit HOW you can spend the money need to be accessible in areas where none of the items you are limited to can be found.

For instance in magical PoorPeoplistan where the MJ shops and strip clubs are plentiful but there are no grocery stores. In such a pakce why should a card limited to specifically grocery items be accessible at all?
Click to expand...

The cards can used at ATMs to access cash. Take that as a given. That's the world as it exists. Given that the cards can be used to access cash at ATMs, who gives a shit where the ATM is located?
 
Bonestorm said:
Using quotation marks when you ain't quoting is silly.




The cards can used at ATMs to access cash. Take that as a given. That's the world as it exists. Given that the cards can be used to access cash at ATMs, who gives a shit where the ATM is located?
Click to expand...

The people whose money it is care. When somebody is taking money from others because of "need" they should not get the option to spend it on strippers and pot. If it was their money to begin with, and not given to as a "hand up" I wouldn't give a rip where they spent money.

And the answer is: I don't think they should be able to withdraw money from these cards. Who gives? Pretty much everybody, except people who think that the only way they can access cash they shouldn't be able to access in the first place is at MJ stores and strip clubs.
 
Damocles said:
The people whose money it is care. When somebody is taking money from others because of "need" they should not get the option to spend it on strippers and pot. If it was their money to begin with, and not given to as a "hand up" I wouldn't give a rip where they spent money.

And the answer is: I don't think they should be able to withdraw money from these cards. Who gives? Pretty much everybody, except people who think that the only way they can access cash they shouldn't be able to access in the first place is at MJ stores and strip clubs.
Click to expand...


But they can withdraw money with the cards. Restricting which ATMs they can use to do so doesn't restrict what they spend the money on. So, again, why does it matter if a waitress at a strip club withdraws cash from an ATM at her work instead of at a bank? And what's to stop a strip club patron from stopping at his local bank and taking out cash and heading over to strip club to make it rain?

It's stupid. If you want to prevent people from accessing cash, do that. Restricting where the cash can be accessed is just asinine.
 
Bonestorm said:
But they can withdraw money with the cards. Restricting which ATMs they can use to do so doesn't restrict what they spend the money on. So, again, why does it matter if a waitress at a strip club withdraws cash from an ATM at her work instead of at a bank? And what's to stop a strip club patron from stopping at his local bank and taking out cash and heading over to strip club to make it rain?

It's stupid. If you want to prevent people from accessing cash, do that. Restricting where the cash can be accessed is just asinine.
Click to expand...
Interesting that a person who thinks that it is a good thing to limit rounds in a magazine can't understand that the extra steps may determine how the money is spent...

Although, again: The right thing to do would be to simply not allow them to withdrawal cash at all as there is no way to stop abuse of the system if there is no check on the system. The left seems to have no limit on what they will say or do to buy votes. When you are spending the money of others you should be more thrifty.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top