SCOTUS tramples 2nd AMED rights of domestic abusers!!

I bet you do and that you also think they should never get their second amendment rights back.
I believe it depends on the crime. If it was felonous assault, I don't think they need a weapon. I believe a review board would be a good option, a case by case.
 
I believe it depends on the crime. If it was felonous assault, I don't think they need a weapon. I believe a review board would be a good option, a case by case.

I kind of agree with you. The problem I see with a review board is that it could raise other constitutional issues, for example if blacks are overwhelmingly deemed not worthy of getting their rights back.

At this time, and I am open to change, I believe that once you serve your time, including parole or any other conditions, you should be restored to full citizenship that includes all the rights people who have never been convicted have. If not, then prison really is not about rehabilitation, but solely about punishment and we should stop fooling ourselves.
 
I kind of agree with you. The problem I see with a review board is that it could raise other constitutional issues, for example if blacks are overwhelmingly deemed not worthy of getting their rights back.

At this time, and I am open to change, I believe that once you serve your time, including parole or any other conditions, you should be restored to full citizenship that includes all the rights people who have never been convicted have. If not, then prison really is not about rehabilitation, but solely about punishment and we should stop fooling ourselves.

prison rarely is about rehabilitation in our system, I have never been fooled :)
 
I believe it depends on the crime. If it was felonous assault, I don't think they need a weapon. I believe a review board would be a good option, a case by case.

if they can't be trusted out in public with a weapon, why are we letting them out to begin with?
 
God's law. :rofl2:

Another oxymoronic position? Somethings can be TRUE AND FALSE.....like the Word of God? You were just USING that word of God (how be it in an ignorant fashion) in an attempt to beat me over the head with it (so its true, or you act as if its true, when you wish to use it to hit someone over the head with it....but its laughably errant when the ACTUAL CONTENT of it proves you wrong?) Alinskites......always attempting to have their cake and eat it also. Any "LIE" to justify an end, Which position do you stand by? I am confused:palm: the circular reasoning from idiocy gives me motion sickness.

Time to pop a dramamine? Its like making the claim that All TRUMP SUPPORTERS are lying idiots....then using their words (stating they are true because they are their own words) in an attempt to prove a propagandized suggestion. First you use the word of God in an attempt to chastise someone....then you declare it laughable when its you that it CHASTISES. I so enjoy the SHOW.....please continue the circular spinning. Let us know when you intend to REVERSE your spinning motion....I hear Whiplash is common with Libertarians and liberals. After all we now have BARRY BUCKS and OBAMAYCARE to take care of the idiocy. Popcorn?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top