ZenMode
Well-known member
No one said any differently. Vacuous fallacy.
Marriage is between a man and woman. There is no other definition.
Inversion fallacy.
They certainly can.
Inversion fallacy.
No one said any differently. Vacuous fallacy.
Marriage is between a man and woman. There is no other definition.
Inversion fallacy.
They certainly can.
Inversion fallacy.
Then there is no election. Nothing to do with marriage.So, in my voting example, where the only option is to vote for Democrat, you'd say that Republicans would be getting special treatment if they were permitted to vote for the person they want to vote for, which would be a Republican?
Voting isn't marriage.Nope.
Again, the default favors one group - straight people. In my example, the default voting law favors one group - democrats.
Because they want to.Why would a gay person marry someone one of the opposite sex?
Homosexual behavior is a sexual act with a person of the same gender. Nothing to do with marriage.Do you not understand what HOMOsexuality means?
The law is not involved here.
They can.
There is.
Buzzphrase ignored.
Pivot ignored.
I get that your entire goal is to bring conversation to a halt by pretending there isn't a conversation to be had, but it's not going to work. I'll just keep mocking you and debating with people who are capable.Then there is no election. Nothing to do with marriage.
Voting isn't marriage.
Because they want to.
Homosexual behavior is a sexual act with a person of the same gender. Nothing to do with marriage.
Not a lasting family in most cases. If the couple stay together and raise the child, it is a marriage.So there is no such thing as being born out of wedlock?
Many marriages ended in divorce.Not a lasting family in most cases. If the couple stay together and raise the child, it is a marriage.
You aren't debating.I get that your entire goal is to bring conversation to a halt by pretending there isn't a conversation to be had, but it's not going to work. I'll just keep mocking you and debating with people who are capable.
So?Many marriages ended in divorce.
There is no such thing as 'same sex marriage'. Buzzword fallacy.The only point you have, Yakuda, is that you don't like same sex marriage.
Who cares, other than you?
Yawn.You aren't debating.
You aren't having much of a conversation either. You are just trying to play word games.
You will find that mocking English is pretty ineffective.
Gay people can get married in any State.It's the truth, not a commentary. Gay people cannot get married in certain jurisdictions.
There is no such thing as 'same sex marriage'. Buzzword fallacy.A deflection. We're talking about same-sex marriage.
There is no such thing as 'same sex marriage'. Buzzword fallacy.Um it clearly refers to same-sex marriage. Are you okay?
Because of the SCOTUS ruling.Gay people can get married in any State.
So your argument is invalid.
You. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!Who said it did?
There are no posts.You. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!
SCOTUS is not involved.Because of the SCOTUS ruling.
Special pleading fallacy. Inversion fallacy.So your argument is invalid.
Grow up.SCOTUS is not involved.