SCOTUS protects marriage equality

No one said any differently. Vacuous fallacy.

Marriage is between a man and woman. There is no other definition.

Inversion fallacy.

They certainly can.

Inversion fallacy.
GJcRzo.gif
 
So, in my voting example, where the only option is to vote for Democrat, you'd say that Republicans would be getting special treatment if they were permitted to vote for the person they want to vote for, which would be a Republican?
Then there is no election. Nothing to do with marriage.
Nope.

Again, the default favors one group - straight people. In my example, the default voting law favors one group - democrats.
Voting isn't marriage.
Why would a gay person marry someone one of the opposite sex?
Because they want to.
Do you not understand what HOMOsexuality means?
Homosexual behavior is a sexual act with a person of the same gender. Nothing to do with marriage.
 
Then there is no election. Nothing to do with marriage.

Voting isn't marriage.

Because they want to.

Homosexual behavior is a sexual act with a person of the same gender. Nothing to do with marriage.
I get that your entire goal is to bring conversation to a halt by pretending there isn't a conversation to be had, but it's not going to work. I'll just keep mocking you and debating with people who are capable.
 
I get that your entire goal is to bring conversation to a halt by pretending there isn't a conversation to be had, but it's not going to work. I'll just keep mocking you and debating with people who are capable.
You aren't debating.
You aren't having much of a conversation either. You are just trying to play word games.

You will find that mocking English is pretty ineffective.
 
Back
Top