SCOTUS protects marriage equality

[ZenMode]

What evangelical White Christian populists REALLY want is supremacy over others. What they REALLY want is special treatment, NOT equal treatment.

Exactly. They want to piss around "marriage" to mark their territory because that's what iron-age men wrote in a book 2,000 years ago.

 

[IBDaMann]

Voting was only offered to white men until those damn women and blacks started whining!

Nope.

 

[IBDaMann]

Oh, I can speak for gfm7175.

Nope.

He is wrong again.

Nope.

You don't have a very good track record.

 

[ZenMode]

Nope.

Yep.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Yakuda is a weirdo living in a world that no longer exists.

All MAGAts are anti-Americans who seek to overthrow our Republic and shred our Constitution.

Is there any doubt that those around him know exactly what kind of traitorous scumbag he really is?

 

[Maze]

 

[IBDaMann]

Still mocking them.

Too funny! AProudLefty is a DEI hire who identifies as a "them" ... but he isn't sure exactly how many of "them" he is.

Do better.

OK.

QUESTION: Why does AProudLefty fart so much when he congregates with other deaf people?
ANSWER: Because he can't get anyone's attention by shouting "Hey!"

 

[gfm7175]

People with different genitals get marriage
People with the same genitals get civil union

It's not a matter of "getting" but rather a matter of "what is, by definition".

That's separate but equal.

Those are separate things that are applied equally to everyone.

Any adult who desires a marriage can become legally joined together.
Any adult who desires a civil union can become legally joined together.
No one is stopping any consenting adult from entering a marriage or a civil union.

A man who likes men is naturally going to choose a civil union (because he doesn't like women).
A man who likes women is naturally going to choose a marriage (because he doesn't like men).

A man who likes men COULD choose a marriage instead, as that option is just as available to him as it is to anyone else, but he naturally won't choose that option because he likes men, not women.

You want to pretend it has something to do with procreation,

The theoretical possibility of procreation is indeed a game-changer in the type of union that is being formed. Only one such union can produce fruit (children). I'll leave it to you to guess which one that is.

which isn't a requirement nor mentioned when giving the marriage license,

It's irrelevant what the state chooses to require or to mention.

because you are too dishonest to admit what this is really about.

Nope, this is YOUR issue. You are too dishonest to admit that this is really about LGBTQLMNOPALPHABETSOUP+ supremacy.

 

[AProudLefty]

Too funny! AProudLefty is a DEI hire who identifies as a "them" ... but he isn't sure exactly how many of "them" he is.

Still mocking a disability. Does it make you feel better about your shortcomings?

OK.

QUESTION: Why does AProudLefty fart so much when he congregates with other deaf people?
ANSWER: Because he can't get anyone's attention by shouting "Hey!"

How old are you?

 

[gfm7175]

And I reject [accept] the lies that are the basis for disallowing equal recognition [supremacy] for all [LGBTQLMNOPALPHABETSOUP+ card-carrying] people.

FTFY.

 

[AProudLefty]

It's not a matter of "getting" but rather a matter of "what is, by definition".

Those are separate things that are applied equally to everyone.

Any adult who desires a marriage can become legally joined together.
Any adult who desires a civil union can become legally joined together.
No one is stopping any consenting adult from entering a marriage or a civil union.

A man who likes men is naturally going to choose a civil union (because he doesn't like women).
A man who likes women is naturally going to choose a marriage (because he doesn't like men).

A man who likes men COULD choose a marriage instead, as that option is just as available to him as it is to anyone else, but he naturally won't choose that option because he likes men, not women.

The theoretical possibility of procreation is indeed a game-changer in the type of union that is being formed. Only one such union can produce fruit (children). I'll leave it to you to guess which one that is.

It's irrelevant what the state chooses to require or to mention.

Nope, this is YOUR issue. You are too dishonest to admit that this is really about LGBTQLMNOPALPHABETSOUP+ supremacy.

There is no such supremacy. It exists only in your mind.

 

[IBDaMann]

[stupid pointless meme omitted]

You're still not a victim.

 

[AProudLefty]

You're still not a victim.

Who said she was a victim?

 

[IBDaMann]

There is no such supremacy.

Not anymore. There sure was, however.

It exists only in [the past now].

FTFY.

 

[gfm7175]

aka Domer Pyle, "Well Gollleeeeeee, Sarge!"

Bingo.

 

[IBDaMann]

Who said she was a victim?

Who said that she ever admitted to believing that she is a victim?

 

[AProudLefty]

Who said that she ever admitted to believing that she is a victim?

Playing like an idiot again?

 

[AProudLefty]

Not anymore. There sure was, however.


FTFY.

Disagreeing with your twin brother @gfm7175?

 

[IBDaMann]

Your brother @IBDaMann claimed that I said I was an engineer.

Nope. You have zero English reading comprehension.

 

[IBDaMann]

Playing like an idiot again?

Living the idiot still?