Scientists Find "Man-made Climate Change Doesn't Exist In Practice"

[Into the Night]

NASA tells it like it is. JPP Denier trolls ? Not so much.

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

They are telling it like it is, all right. They are denying science and mathematics. NASA is a government organization currently assigned to push the Church of Global Warming. They are telling it like it is.

 

[moon]

'No doubt left' about scientific consensus on global warming, say experts

Extensive historical data shows recent extreme warming is unprecedented in past 2,000 years

The scientific consensus that humans are causing global warming is likely to have passed 99%, according to the lead author of the most authoritative study on the subject, and could rise further after separate research that clears up some of the remaining doubts.

Three studies published in Nature and Nature Geoscience use extensive historical data to show there has never been a period in the last 2,000 years when temperature changes have been as fast and extensive as in recent decades.

It had previously been thought that similarly dramatic peaks and troughs might have occurred in the past, including in periods dubbed the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Climate Anomaly. But the three studies use reconstructions based on 700 proxy records of temperature change, such as trees, ice and sediment, from all continents that indicate none of these shifts took place in more than half the globe at any one time.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/...ming-passes-99

THE END for the Denier Choir. Now for some anti-ecocide legislation.

 

[Into the Night]

'No doubt left' about scientific consensus on global warming,

Science doesn't use concensus, has no proofs, and has no theories about undefined buzzwords. Define 'global warming'.

say experts

Science isn't 'experts'. Science is a set of falsifiable theories.

Extensive historical data shows recent extreme warming is unprecedented in past 2,000 years

What data? It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.

The scientific consensus

Science doesn't use consensus.

that humans are causing global warming is likely to have passed 99%,

Argument from randU fallacy.

according to the lead author of the most authoritative study on the subject,

How typical of the Church of Global Warming. Claiming mysterious unnamed 'experts', unnamed authors of some book, claiming a single book is 'authoritative', and denies theories of science such as the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. Define 'climate change'.

and could rise further after separate research that clears up some of the remaining doubts.

Science is never 'settled'. Science has no proofs. A theory of science remains a theory of science until it is destroyed by falsification. It does not use supporting evidence. Only religions do that. Only fundamentalists point to that and call it a 'proof'.

Three studies published in Nature and Nature Geoscience use extensive historical data to show there has never been a period in the last 2,000 years when temperature changes have been as fast and extensive as in recent decades.

Neither of these magazine nor any study is capable of measuring the temperature of the Earth.

It had previously been thought that similarly dramatic peaks and troughs might have occurred in the past, including in periods dubbed the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Climate Anomaly.

Denying your own history in London, eh? What about all that artwork depicting people ice skating on the Thames? What about the times when wine grapes were grown in England almost all the way to Scotland?

But the three studies use reconstructions based on 700 proxy records

Proxy data is not used in science. All measurements to test a theory must be direct measurements. Science does not use supporting evidence.

of temperature change, such as trees, ice and sediment,

None of these indicate a temperature change.

from all continents that indicate none of these shifts took place in more than half the globe at any one time.

You will find those that disagree on that, but their claims are just as bogus as yours.

THE END for the Denier Choir. Now for some anti-ecocide legislation.

Define 'ecocide'. Define 'climate change'. Define 'global warming'. Define 'climate disaster'.

Who are you to establish the Church of Global Warming as the State religion?

 

[moon]

Define ' definition' you daft prat. You're done;

'No doubt left' about scientific consensus on global warming, say experts

Extensive historical data shows recent extreme warming is unprecedented in past 2,000 years

The scientific consensus that humans are causing global warming is likely to have passed 99%, according to the lead author of the most authoritative study on the subject, and could rise further after separate research that clears up some of the remaining doubts.

Three studies published in Nature and Nature Geoscience use extensive historical data to show there has never been a period in the last 2,000 years when temperature changes have been as fast and extensive as in recent decades.

It had previously been thought that similarly dramatic peaks and troughs might have occurred in the past, including in periods dubbed the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Climate Anomaly. But the three studies use reconstructions based on 700 proxy records of temperature change, such as trees, ice and sediment, from all continents that indicate none of these shifts took place in more than half the globe at any one time.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/...ming-passes-99