Scientific study of Trump’s tweets reveals ‘neurotic tendencies’ and ‘underlying low

[evince]

All typical political aggressions committed by all.

link

 

[Micawber]

You mean "media attacks on him".
Must be a lot of neurotics here, then. Somebody attacks someone...they attack in return. Any other news?

Poor wittle Twumpy. Trump provides a lot of material for reporters, such as the constant lying, attacking his own picks, firings, bragging then failing to achieve his stated promises, lack of transparency such as tax filings, causing expenditure by making the govt foot the bill for his lavish lifestyle.

 

[Cypress]

you are not taking account why " he started it" i,e, Fake News

Your hero, President Pussy Grabber, is the KING of FAKE NEWS.

He spent years bellowing that Obama was not a US citizen, that his birth certificate was faked. Only years later, and very belatedly, admitting that he made up the whole fake birth certificate thing.

President Pussy Grabber whined that thousands of muslims were dancing in the streets of New Jersey on Sept. 11, 2001.

President Pussy Grabber wailed that Obama wire tapped him.

You and all other Trumptards are never, ever, under any circumstances, allowed to whine about fake news Trump is guilty of being the King of Fake News.

 

[anatta]

Your hero, President Pussy Grabber, is the KING of FAKE NEWS.

He spent years bellowing that Obama was not a US citizen, that his birth certificate was faked. Only years later, and very belatedly, admitting that he made up the whole fake birth certificate thing.

President Pussy Grabber whined that thousands of muslims were dancing in the streets of New Jersey on Sept. 11, 2001.

President Pussy Grabber wailed that Obama wire tapped him.

You and all other Trumptards are never, ever, under any circumstances, allowed to whine about fake news Trump is guilty of being the King of Fake News.

same old sanctimonious bullshit from Cypress.
In your thirst to slam Trump you COMPLETELY misunderstand why I used the term "fake news"

But I'm sure you have no clue about the NYTimes self confessed use of "advocacy journalism" while covering Trump
And I'm sure you have no clue of the dire headlines and anti-Trump slant that WaPo uses all the time.
Like I mentioned above go ahead and cover the Trump's insults or his birther dalliance.

Trump isn't the press, and the fact you are OK with the press now becoming nothing more then an arm of the Democrats (or any party) tells me you have no respect for how the 4th estate should police itself