Scientific study of Trump’s tweets reveals ‘neurotic tendencies’ and ‘underlying low

signalmankenneth

Verified User
Scientific study of Trump’s tweets reveals ‘neurotic tendencies’ and ‘underlying low well-being’

A new scientific study of President Donald Trump’s tweets reveals that the president suffers from both “neurotic tendencies” and an “underlying low well-being.”

Via Eureka Alert, two researchers have released their results of an analysis conducted on thousands of Trump tweets dating back to last October that shows the president has both some positive leadership qualities and some disturbing ones.

The researchers — Martin Obschonka from the Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship Research at Queensland University of Technology in Australia, and Christian Fisch from Trier University in Germany — found that Trump has key qualities that are typically found in successful entrepreneurs, including creativity and competitiveness.

On the downside, the researchers say that Trump has a willingness to break rules, while also indicating that the president has “neurotic tendencies” and that he “experiences underlying low well-being.”

“Maybe this high neuroticism is a major motivator to succeed in Trump’s entrepreneurial projects in his business life, but also in his role as political leader,” speculates Fisch.

However, the researchers note that traits that may help someone succeed in the business world might not translate well to the world of governing in a democratic society, which functions by having its leaders obey certain sets of laws and norms.

Additionally, notes Obschonka, many successful entrepreneurs show a great deal more mental and emotional stability than Trump does.

“These traits are rather untypical for entrepreneurs since working as an entrepreneur may not only require emotional stability and optimism but also be able to increase happiness due to procedural utility,” he explains.

By Brad Redd

candidate-donald-trump-800x430.jpg
 
trumpy:hes so obviously moraless


he cares about nothing but how he looks to others


he doesnt even like himself

he needs constant priase from others
 
Can't ever remember anyone in need of that much attention, which is really a mindbender considering he occupies the most powerful position in the world

http://www.trumptwitterarchive.com/

Note the close to three hundred individual attacks on the media, he certainly doesn't like criticism of any kind
 
All he lives for is adulation. Anyone who listened to his deranged speech to the Boy Scouts knows that. Not to mention the ongoing "You like me! You really like me!" campaign rallies.

Anyone wanna bet he'll bring up Hillary, the election, fake news and his AG tonight in Youngstown?
 
You mean "media attacks on him".
Must be a lot of neurotics here, then. Somebody attacks someone...they attack in return. Any other news?
 
blah blah blah..It's a good thing I'm not a politician, i'd be lobbing hand grenades @ Congress by now
 
you are not taking account why " he started it" i,e, Fake News

He insulted Cruz, he insulted Bush, he insulted all the others running in the primaries. Then he insulted people who had nothing to do with his campaign like Alicia Machado and Megyn Kelly. None of that was fake news.
 
He insulted Cruz, he insulted Bush, he insulted all the others running in the primaries. Then he insulted people who had nothing to do with his campaign like Alicia Machado and Megyn Kelly. None of that was fake news.
That's a campaign and he can say what he likes. Of course it should be covered too.

What you are missing is the COVERAGE by Huff Po where they covered him in the entertainment section.
Or the NYTimes "advocacy journalism" - wtf is that anyways?
Or the grotesques headline/spin of Bezo's WaPo..

Nothing wrong with covering Trump or his insults
what's wrong is the press is a servile arm of the Democratic party in how they cover.
 
That's a campaign and he can say what he likes. Of course it should be covered too.

What you are missing is the COVERAGE by Huff Po where they covered him in the entertainment section.
Or the NYTimes "advocacy journalism" - wtf is that anyways?
Or the grotesques headline/spin of Bezo's WaPo..

Nothing wrong with covering Trump or his insults
what's wrong is the press is a servile arm of the Democratic party in how they cover.

why would a corporate media do that ?


its utter bullshit
 
Back
Top