SC Enforces POTUS' Travel Ban

GazzaQueen said:
The 2016 polls were wildly inaccurate. They predicted a certain Hillary victory. The Don had no path to 270.
Click to expand...

They actually weren't "wildly inaccurate." The PUNDITS predicted a Hillary victory. The pollsters, not so much.

The national polls - which, again, are the same that are used for approval ratings - were pretty right on. It's funny that you guys think Trump's approval rating might be 10 or 20% higher than what his approval ratings now show, based on national polls that were incredibly close in 2016.

Such denial. People don't like Trump. Deal w/ it.
 
Thing1 said:
They actually weren't "wildly inaccurate." The PUNDITS predicted a Hillary victory. The pollsters, not so much.

The national polls - which, again, are the same that are used for approval ratings - were pretty right on. It's funny that you guys think Trump's approval rating might be 10 or 20% higher than what his approval ratings now show, based on national polls that were incredibly close in 2016.

Such denial. People don't like Trump. Deal w/ it.
Click to expand...
No kidding. They've been doing backflips since November. But accomplishing campaign promises has not lost him voters. That's why they voted for him.
 
Thing1 said:
They actually weren't "wildly inaccurate." The PUNDITS predicted a Hillary victory. The pollsters, not so much.

The national polls - which, again, are the same that are used for approval ratings - were pretty right on. It's funny that you guys think Trump's approval rating might be 10 or 20% higher than what his approval ratings now show, based on national polls that were incredibly close in 2016.

Such denial. People don't like Trump. Deal w/ it.
Click to expand...


Actually the national polls weren't so far off from where they were historically. What was wildly out of whack was how pundits, the media and people like you were interpreting them. You also ignored the state polls even though I kept showing them to you which bolstered my prediction that Trump would win NC, FL, PA, WI and MI.

So yeah the polls weren't far off, but you were
 
Thing1 said:
No - where did I say that?
Click to expand...

Thing1 said:
And she won nationally by about 2%. She lost the electoral vote, which determines the Presidency - but we're talking about national polls.

Stop drooling & use your brain.
Click to expand...

She won California and New York, some big population states. And not much else. Perhaps you need to get out more and visit the flyover states, and get some feel of reality lol
 
Thing1 said:
You're completely disregarding the huge #'s of voters who were simply voting against Hillary.
Click to expand...

only from a dumba$$ perspective
Conservatives are smarter than that, if we didn't like DOn, and we didn't like Hillary, we wouldn't vote.

Liberals are the ones that vote because of the D tattooed on her forehead
 
Getin the ring said:
only from a dumba$$ perspective
Conservatives are smarter than that, if we didn't like DOn, and we didn't like Hillary, we wouldn't vote.

Liberals are the ones that vote because of the D tattooed on her forehead
Click to expand...

I heard it was tattooed on her vagina, that way she can point to the only other reason for 'rats to vote for her lol
 
Getin the ring said:
6-3...5-4...mehhh

semantics

look, Trump has to save liberals from themselves.
An I am ok with that
Click to expand...

no its not sematics. If my sources are correct this is essentially a 9-0 ruling. The only 3 who dissented wanted to let the whole thing thru. This makes the lower courts look like idiots.
 
tsuke said:
no its not sematics. If my sources are correct this is essentially a 9-0 ruling. The only 3 who dissented wanted to let the whole thing thru. This makes the lower courts look like idiots.
Click to expand...

ahh, I see your point.

And the lower courts were idiots at best when it comes to understanding the constitution apparently, calling them partisan hacks I guess was giving them a break
 
Thing1 said:
Good trends overall, quite honestly. You can make a lame joke about "moral victories," but every special election - in deep red districts - has seen wins that Republicans used to coast to by big double-digits reduced to single digits. On average, Democrats have gained 8% in those elections.

Clearly, not enough to win in deep red districts. But come '18, a lot of the contested seats will be in more purple areas.
Click to expand...

So basically, your new battle cry is - WE'RE #2 / WE'RE #2
 
Thing1 said:
His approval ratings are terrible. You can make a snarky comment about polls, but the nationals polls were pretty close in '16, and you guys always post the approval polls when there is an anomaly & it looks like they're getting better.

They're not right now. He is down in the 30's. Trump is an historically unpopular President - it isn't just libs. There are a LOT of conservatives who have disdain for this guy.
Click to expand...

Are those like the polls that said his numbers were too low to win??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top