Sarah Palin is so stupid

Chapdog

Abreast of the situations
She blasts Scott Brown for not being a lock and step conservative then goes on to say in Alaska she has independent spirits. What a blatant contradiction. I will abstain from voting if the election was between her and obama.



WASHINGTON – Sarah Palin said yesterday that while Massachusetts may “put up with” Senator Scott Brown, the conservatives in her home state of Alaska “wouldn’t stand for” him.

Palin, in an interview on Fox Business Network, was asked whether the Massachusetts Republican was “on notice” for siding with Democrats on several key votes.

“Well, you know, take the consideration, though, that that's Massachusetts,” Palin said. “Perhaps they’re not going to look for such a hard-core constitutional conservative there, and they're going to put up with Scott Brown and some of the antics there.”

“But up here in Alaska, and so many places in the US where we have a pioneering, independent spirit, and we have an expectation that our representatives in D.C. will respect the will of the people and the intelligence of the people,” she added. “Well, up here, we wouldn't stand for that.”

A spokeswoman for Brown did not directly engage with Palin but defended the senator's record, saying he was focused on the Bay State.

"Senator Brown's votes are based on what's in the best interests of Massachusetts and he has made his priorities job creation, controlling spending, and reducing the deficit," Gail Gitcho, his communications director, said in a statement. "All Republicans can agree on that."

The Globe reported this morning on the more mainstream GOP candidates that Brown has been supporting so far in the midterm elections. Palin, on the other hand, has been a strong supporter of several candidates backed by the Tea Party movement.

Palin and Brown have never been particularly close. Toward the end of Brown’s campaign in January, the SEIU launched a $685,000 ad campaign seeking to link Brown to Palin. But the former vice presidential nominee never appeared in Massachusetts, and Brown did not ask for her help.

“I would have [endorsed him] if he had requested it,” Palin told Fox News after Brown’s victory.

Palin called Brown to congratulate him after he won, but they have had little interaction since. Brown skipped the Tea Party rallies earlier this year that Palin was headlining in Boston and Washington.
 
I think its despicable that she hijacked the tea party movement name that essentially led to Scott Browns win and re-branded it completely different then what it stood for when we voted Brown. It was all about standing as an independent and making decisions that are good for your people.. not anything to do with lock step conservatives.
 
further proof that palin is a teajacktivist/modern conservative/gop plant to take over the tea movement.

I think so as well because the real tea party movement (or the name given to us) was a group of loose affiliated voters mostly financial conservatives, social liberals, independents, and conservative democrats who were tired of all the bullshit the media was feeding us up here. They crowned martha coakly new chair of the 'ted kennedy' senate seat before the campaign even started. You can only tolerate arrogance for so long as a people and for them to suggest we didn't have control over the 'peoples seat' is what cause the huge upset.
 
According to you it was in the interest of your state. Cite the specific act.

well i know he was lambasted by the republican rank and file for voting in favor of a watered down revenue neutral jobs bill. This bill will create jobs in the state.

I guess the alternative was to be the obstructionist that most of the rank and file republicans are but that wouldn't go over well in MA.
 
well i know he was lambasted by the republican rank and file for voting in favor of a watered down revenue neutral jobs bill. This bill will create jobs in the state.

I guess the alternative was to be the obstructionist that most of the rank and file republicans are but that wouldn't go over well in MA.

There you go. Lib-tards believe that the government can create jobs, conservatives understand the reality that the government can't. So Palin was blasting Brown for being for big government, which is the opposite of what the TEA party is about.
 
There you go. Lib-tards believe that the government can create jobs, conservatives understand the reality that the government can't. So Palin was blasting Brown for being for big government, which is the opposite of what the TEA party is about.

Neither party really believes in reducing there own employer. They just shift money from one spot to the next. If not in stimulus plans with the dems then its with war expenses and tax breaks to billionaires with the pubs.

Neither party cares about the typical under 250K individuals interests.
 
Neither party really believes in reducing there own employer. They just shift money from one spot to the next. If not in stimulus plans with the dems then its with war expenses and tax breaks to billionaires with the pubs.

Neither party cares about the typical under 250K individuals interests.
So? The issue here is the TEA Party, not the GOP or the Democrat Party. Scott Brown campaigned on TEA Party principles, then got to Congress at went against those principles, so Palin, who actually believes in those principles, called him out. Your response is to call her stupid.
 
So? The issue here is the TEA Party, not the GOP or the Democrat Party. Scott Brown campaigned on TEA Party principles, then got to Congress at went against those principles, so Palin, who actually believes in those principles, called him out. Your response is to call her stupid.

actually as one of those who voted for brown we got labeled tea party but in reality were made up lots of groups of voters. The republicans liked the tea party idea and turned it into there own (with there principles) and then Sarah who is no tea party member decided to stamp herself head of a tea party movement in the wake of what happened in MA. Brown is doing exactly what he said he was going to do when he was campaigning which is not vote party line and do whats best for the state.
 
actually as one of those who voted for brown we got labeled tea party but in reality were made up lots of groups of voters. The republicans liked the tea party idea and turned it into there own (with there principles) and then Sarah who is no tea party member decided to stamp herself head of a tea party movement in the wake of what happened in MA. Brown is doing exactly what he said he was going to do when he was campaigning which is not vote party line and do whats best for the state.
Again, so what? He still campaigned on TEA Party principles, went against those principles and your response is to call Palin stupid for stating that.
 
I guess depends on what the principles are. If tea-party is now considered to be the equivalent of libertarianism then what current republican could be called such? Most of them voted for huge war spending bills.

isnt sarah palan (the unofficial head of the tea party) a huge war spending supporter?
 
Last edited:
You're trying to change the subject because you were called on calling Palin stupid because she told the truth.
 
Back
Top