Russian commander killed by own troops

Dutch Uncle said:
The fact you truly believe that is why Jihadist terrorists keep murdering innocent people.
Click to expand...

You're a cheerleader for Neo-Zionist invasion and atrocities, you racist prick.

Maybe you're just too dumb to recognize your own stinking hypocrisy.
 
ExpressLane said:
Guille said:
I'm having a hard time believing this.
Click to expand...
Me too.
Click to expand...
Is there any doubt that you two Trumpers would easily believe American troops ran over their own commanders?

https://news.yahoo.com/russian-comm...aine-losses-160618503.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall
Russia is believed to be sending top leaders to the frontlines in a bid to bolster low morale among troops.

A Western official said: “We believe he was killed by his own troops deliberately.

"Indeed, we believe he was run over by his own troops. And I believe he was the commander of the 37th Motor Rifle Brigade.”

They added he was killed as a "consequence of the scale of losses that had been taken by his brigade.
 
moon said:
You're a cheerleader for Neo-Zionist invasion and atrocities, you racist prick.

Maybe you're just too dumb to recognize your own stinking hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

Disagreed, Ms. Moon, but I understand why you and the cocksuckers who support you want to believe that to be true.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Is there any doubt that you two Trumpers would easily believe American troops ran over their own commanders?

https://news.yahoo.com/russian-comm...aine-losses-160618503.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall
Russia is believed to be sending top leaders to the frontlines in a bid to bolster low morale among troops.

A Western official said: “We believe he was killed by his own troops deliberately.

"Indeed, we believe he was run over by his own troops. And I believe he was the commander of the 37th Motor Rifle Brigade.”

They added he was killed as a "consequence of the scale of losses that had been taken by his brigade.
Click to expand...
Isn't that like getting run over by a bulldozer? I know they can reach decent speeds, but I'm not sure how one achieves this unless he was in his sleeping bag?
 
Althea said:
Isn't that like getting run over by a bulldozer? I know they can reach decent speeds, but I'm not sure how one achieves this unless he was in his sleeping bag?
Click to expand...

My guess is he wasn't looking and it took him from behind.

FWIW, modern tanks can get up to 40-50MPH.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
My guess is he wasn't looking and it took him from behind.

FWIW, modern tanks can get up to 40-50MPH.
Click to expand...
Yes. I understand that they can reach those speeds, but I'm not sure what the 0-50 looks like? ;).

Given the nature of information coming from the battlefield, he might have been bound and gagged and then run over!
 
Althea said:
Isn't that like getting run over by a bulldozer? I know they can reach decent speeds, but I'm not sure how one achieves this unless he was in his sleeping bag?
Click to expand...

Video demos I have seen of modern tanks show they have remarkable acceleration, speed, manuverability for their size.
 
Althea said:
Yes. I understand that they can reach those speeds, but I'm not sure what the 0-50 looks like? ;).

Given the nature of information coming from the battlefield, he might have been bound and gagged and then run over!
Click to expand...

That's possible too, but more likely he was just standing nearby and the tank altered course before he knew what happened.
 
Nordberg said:
We have no idea what happened, or if it happened. Can't you guys wait until the truth comes out?
Click to expand...

98 percent of what gets posted on "current events" is recent news reporting that is always provisional and subject to revision based on new facts.

That never stopped us from posting in the Current Events thread category before.

I will say that outside of the venerable BBC, I do not have a lot of faith in British newspaper and media sources, they tend to have a sensationalist, tabloid perspective on news.
 
Cypress said:
98 percent of what gets posted on "current events" is recent news reporting that is always provisional and subject to revision based on new facts.

That never stopped us from posting in the Current Events thread category before.

I will say that outside of the venerable BBC, I do not have a lot of faith in British newspaper and media sources, they tend to have a sensationalist, tabloid perspective on news.
Click to expand...

Rupert Murdoch's tentacles are virulent and widespread
- as are those of the other 14 billionaires that own the world's media.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top