Rule of Law Restored

Uncensored2008

Uncensored2008

Well-known member
Contributor
In a major victory for America and the Constitution, the SCOTUS ruled today that district courts are NOT empowered to issue nationwide injunctions. This effectively shuts down the insurrection by the judiciary and the sedition of judges like Boasberg.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1938627245482131554
View: https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1938627245482131554?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1938627245482131554%7Ctwgr%5Ed47162631229026eda667f0fea5e47e2b9b2c511%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Ftipsheet%2Fkatiepavlich%2F2025%2F06%2F27%2Fwhite-house-responds-to-victory-over-national-injunctions-n2659556


It is noted that Barrett sided with the conservatives, sending a message that she will do so regarding the Anchor Babies case as well.
 
And the Left responds...

hair-on-fire-498-x-339-gif-0wfiog6862nhhm46.gif
 
This was 6-3 with even Hollywood John Roberts siding with the pro-constitution side of the court. Barrett went nuclear on Brown - who is trying hard to displace Sotomayor as the dumbest SCOTUS Justice in history.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
In a major victory for America and the Constitution, the SCOTUS ruled today that district courts are NOT empowered to issue nationwide injunctions. This effectively shuts down the insurrection by the judiciary and the sedition of judges like Boasberg.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1938627245482131554
View: https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1938627245482131554?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1938627245482131554%7Ctwgr%5Ed47162631229026eda667f0fea5e47e2b9b2c511%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Ftipsheet%2Fkatiepavlich%2F2025%2F06%2F27%2Fwhite-house-responds-to-victory-over-national-injunctions-n2659556


It is noted that Barrett sided with the conservatives, sending a message that she will do so regarding the Anchor Babies case as well.
Click to expand...
Did they?

What they did do was make the Executive Branch supreme over the other two branches of Government. Going forward, any President, even future Democrat Presdies, can pretty much declare anything he wants as law, he doesn’t need Congress, and any legal challenge is limited and burdensome.

Between the idiotic immunity bullshit, and this, Trump’s Court has established the precedent leading to an actual Imperial Presidency, exactly what the Founding Fathers were trying to avoid. And to think, not that long ago the right used to echo that less Government and a weaker Presidency was one of their core principles

(Now in rebuttal we are going to see another corny GIF or some remark saying the left is crying)
 
zymurgy said:
that issue is still undecided
Click to expand...

Trump's EO stands. The seditious judges cannot issue nationwide injunctions to stop it. Which means Anchor Babies are done.

zymurgy said:
the court left intact the ability of plaintiffs to get broad relief through class action lawsuits - and that is exactly what will happen here
Click to expand...

If district courts can't issue national injunctions, I'm not sure how that would work.
 
archives said:
Did they?
Click to expand...

Yes they did.

You can pout, but reality will still exist.

archives said:
What they did do was make the Executive Branch supreme over the other two branches of Government.
Click to expand...

ROFL

What a stupid, childish claim.

archives said:
Going forward, any President, even future Democrat Presdies, can pretty much declare anything he wants as law, he doesn’t need Congress, and any legal challenge is limited and burdensome.
Click to expand...

The SCOTUS is still a check against executive power - district courts no longer have greater power than the President. The rule of law has been restored.

archives said:
Between the idiotic immunity bullshit, and this, Trump’s Court has established the precedent leading to an actual Imperial Presidency, exactly what the Founding Fathers were trying to avoid. And to think, not that long ago the right used to echo that less Government and a weaker Presidency was one of their core principles
Click to expand...

So, you cry "NUHN UHN" then go on to throw a temper tantrum over how unfair it is.

archives said:
(Now in rebuttal we are going to see another corny GIF or some remark saying the left is crying)
Click to expand...

LOL

The meltdowns by the left are so fun to watch.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Trump's EO stands. The seditious judges cannot issue nationwide injunctions to stop it. Which means Anchor Babies are done.



If district courts can't issue national injunctions, I'm not sure how that would work.
Click to expand...
Not true, the Court did not rule on birthright citizenship, rather that district federal judges can not issue nationwide injunctions. If Trump deported anchor babies he would be breaking the existing law (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/169/649/).

According to the Court District Court rulings would apply only in the areas where they hold jurisdiction.
 
archives said:
Did they?

What they did do was make the Executive Branch supreme over the other two branches of Government. Going forward, any President, even future Democrat Presdies, can pretty much declare anything he wants as law, he doesn’t need Congress, and any legal challenge is limited and burdensome.

Between the idiotic immunity bullshit, and this, Trump’s Court has established the precedent leading to an actual Imperial Presidency, exactly what the Founding Fathers were trying to avoid. And to think, not that long ago the right used to echo that less Government and a weaker Presidency was one of their core principles

(Now in rebuttal we are going to see another corny GIF or some remark saying the left is crying)
Click to expand...
25756d834ba20b08dace9c2f5bd731f9.jpg
 
Uncensored2008 said:
In a major victory for America and the Constitution, the SCOTUS ruled today that district courts are NOT empowered to issue nationwide injunctions. This effectively shuts down the insurrection by the judiciary and the sedition of judges like Boasberg.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1938627245482131554
View: https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1938627245482131554?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1938627245482131554%7Ctwgr%5Ed47162631229026eda667f0fea5e47e2b9b2c511%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Ftipsheet%2Fkatiepavlich%2F2025%2F06%2F27%2Fwhite-house-responds-to-victory-over-national-injunctions-n2659556


It is noted that Barrett sided with the conservatives, sending a message that she will do so regarding the Anchor Babies case as well.
Click to expand...
This is a great victory!
:woot:
 
Teflon Don said:
The court punted on birthright citizenship. That is true.

What they didn't punt on and is a YUGE loss for the left is these nationwide injunctions by district court judges. That is a no no now.
Click to expand...
Not entirely, but makes it makes it much more difficult

And what you are missing, probably because you view everything in partisan glasses, is that this sets the precedent going forward, regardless of who is President. Along with the Court’s idiotic immunity ruling, in practice, the Executive Branch doesn’t need either of the other two bodies of the Government, he can pretty much do anything it wants, regardless of party.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
In a major victory for America and the Constitution, the SCOTUS ruled today that district courts are NOT empowered to issue nationwide injunctions. This effectively shuts down the insurrection by the judiciary and the sedition of judges like Boasberg.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1938627245482131554
View: https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1938627245482131554?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1938627245482131554%7Ctwgr%5Ed47162631229026eda667f0fea5e47e2b9b2c511%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Ftipsheet%2Fkatiepavlich%2F2025%2F06%2F27%2Fwhite-house-responds-to-victory-over-national-injunctions-n2659556


It is noted that Barrett sided with the conservatives, sending a message that she will do so regarding the Anchor Babies case as well.
Click to expand...
Are you referring to Trumpian law??????
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It's pretty simple, district courts can't issue national injunctions. That means to get one you have to go to appellate court or the supreme court.

The interesting part is this just destroyed like 25 to 30 Leftist court injunctions against Trump.
Click to expand...

Exactly. So the SCOTUS has the check against other branches - not 4800 district courts.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top