DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Its obviously because those folks in 49 states were just too stupit.... 

The above says all that needs to be said about the idiocy of the left. The American public did not elect Reagan in a landslide because they were paranoid about the rest of the world.
Keep making up ridiculous assertions... they are actually rather amusing.
So the Iran hostage crisis and Russia had no bearing on the 1980 election then? How old were you in 1980 anyway, ten or 11 maybe?
I never said Reagan didn't use teleprompters, but take the teleprompters away and Reagan and Clinton could still deliver... Obama cannot.
lol... thinking he was 'better'???
please. If they just thought he was 'better'... they wouldn't have created the landslide that elected him.
a very good rebuttal. It shows just how deranged some on the left are when they describe Reagan.
It is hardly a myth and no, he is not helpless. But he is also not the natural orator that Clinton and Reagan were.
Also... comparing Obama to Bush is like standing next to a rock and shouting to the world 'I am smarter than this here rock'.
His competition was sorely lacking. The map on its own doesn't say anything to me, other than his competition was weak.
Reagan is over-mythologized. I do not dislike the guy at all; I think he wanted what was best for America. But his mythologization is based almost exclusively on the fact that he looked like a President, and sounded like a President (as well as getting too much credit for the fall of the Soviets). He wasn't an exceptionally intelligent man, and his policies, by & large, ultimately had a negative effect not just for most Americans, but for our long-term standing as a superpower...
He was an actor Superfreak, he was an actor. A bad, actor, but he was still an actor and he acted his way right through a Presidency.
Have you ever heard some of his earlier speeches, like when he was with GE? Who do you think wrote those?He was an actor Superfreak, he was an actor. A bad, actor, but he was still an actor and he acted his way right through a Presidency.
Obama is certainly better than many other Presidents. Ford, Bush Jr. are two that quickly come to mind.
But when Obama is compared to Clinton and Reagan, he is no where close to being in their league.
I don't disagree that Reagan is over-hyped by some on the far right. The recent nonsense of a check list highlights that. Like the far left, the far right tries to warp Reagan into what they want him to represent rather than what he actually was.
The phrase 'exceptionally intelligent' is obviously subjective, so I will let that slide. Reagan was not the brain dead moron the far left portrays him as. Nor did he possess anything close to the intellect of Clinton.
As for policies... Reagan's policies were a benefit to this country and to our regaining superpower status. I would be greatly interested to hear which policies you feel were so detrimental to our superpower status.
I don't disagree that Reagan is over-hyped by some on the far right. The recent nonsense of a check list highlights that. Like the far left, the far right tries to warp Reagan into what they want him to represent rather than what he actually was.
The phrase 'exceptionally intelligent' is obviously subjective, so I will let that slide. Reagan was not the brain dead moron the far left portrays him as. Nor did he possess anything close to the intellect of Clinton.
As for policies... Reagan's policies were a benefit to this country and to our regaining superpower status. I would be greatly interested to hear which policies you feel were so detrimental to our superpower status.
...he expanded the federal government by 90%.
http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/002094.htm#threeFederal government spending was a quarter higher in real terms when Reagan left office than when he entered. As a share of GDP, the federal government shrank from 22.2 percent to 21.2 percent...
The nuclear arms race was detrimental to our nation. Military build up. His belief that debt is not bad, he expanded the federal government by 90%.
3) PLEASE provide us a link to where he expanded the federal government by 90%
http://www.lewrockwell.com/gregory/gregory12.htmlAs president, Reagan expanded the federal government by about 90%.
Short-term, not long-term. To start with, I don't give Reagan much credit for the collapse of the Soviets, something that was decades in the making and came about mostly internally. On foreign policy in general, I don't give him very high grades, from continuing the US policy of overplaying our hand in the Mideast, to Iran-Contra, his policies ultimately undermined much of what he sought to do.
Fiscally, he was a disaster. His policies gave a very short-term boost, but at the expense of long-term debt and deficit. They weren't planned for the long-term (and this is a problem with our politics in general - Presidents are concerned about their own re-election, not what the effect of their policies will be 1-2 decades down the line). And fiscally is where our path down the road of being less than a superpower is going...
If you look at how close the results were in Minnesota People in 50 states were almost stupit. Mondale won his own state by lest than .2 % of the vote. Which is still better than Gore did in his home state.Its obviously because those folks in 49 states were just too stupit....![]()
Here you have gone off the deep end. A short term boost? The bull market ran from 1982 to 2000 with a few mild hiccups along the way. It was one of the greatest times in our countries history. It is laughable that you proclaim his policies resulted in the expense of our long term debt and continuing deficits. Name one that did so.
If you want to ignore Congress and just relate events solely to the President... then fine... Medicare/Medicaid under Johnson is one of the biggest additions to our debt.
The repeal of Glass Steagall by Clinton was the most significant factor in our economic meltdown in 2008 and the subsequent insanity that resulted in $5 TRILLION being added to our debt in three short years.
God trivia. It was almost a shut out.If you look at how close the results were in Minnesota People in 50 states were almost stupit. Mondale won his own state by lest than .2 % of the vote. Which is still better than Gore did in his home state.