Roe v. Wade is 'precedent,' Kavanaugh says

i have said many times roe v wade is not under threat. like... literally all the time i say this. as usual liberals are alarmist, hyperventilating liars. to cover up for them being so wrong on kavanaugh, they try to spin it as a victory for them or a betrayal of conservatives when it was never the case to begin with. too funny.

So we are alarmist and hyperventilating for being lied to. Because they are pulling the alarm and shutting off the oxygen.

They say they want to overturn Roe. That's all they say, all the time. It's like a mantra. Oh my, you fooled me Republicans, by LYING about your secret intention not to overturn Roe
while having every Repuke potus candidate take the abort Roe v Wade pledge.....

It's not our fault that smart people don't want to be dumb and perhaps betray the dumb they pretend to represent. It's our fault if we let dumb people have power.
And how can we tell? We have to go by what they say publicly or in their record of writing decisions in the lower appellate courts.
 
So we are alarmist and hyperventilating for being lied to. Because they are pulling the alarm and shutting off the oxygen.

They say they want to overturn Roe. That's all they say, all the time. It's like a mantra. Oh my, you fooled me Republicans, by LYING about your secret intention not to overturn Roe
while having every Repuke potus candidate take the abort Roe v Wade pledge.....

It's not our fault that smart people don't want to be dumb and perhaps betray the dumb. It's our fault if we let dumb people have power.

who is they? kavanaugh never said anything about overturning roe v. wade. yet you lose your shit regardless.
 
Oh my, you fooled me Republicans, by LYING about your secret intention not to overturn Roe
while having every Repuke potus candidate take the abort Roe v Wade pledge.....

Secret intention not to overturn Roe? Nobody said they were going to overturn it--only that some said they wanted to. Not many seriously believed it was going to happen. If Republicans really wanted to overturn Roe they would have introduced a constitutional amendment in the 1970's or 1980's.

Democrats should be praising Kavanaugh.
 
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh on Wednesday described Roe v. Wade's right to abortion as settled -- "important precedent" -- yet he has also narrowly interpreted when a woman can exercise that right.


https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/kavanaugh-roe-v-wade-planned-parenthood-casey/index.html

You Democrats force nominees to play cat and mouse. Of course nominees are going to be evasive when blowhard Democrats ask questions they shouldn't be allowed to ask in the first place.

Your side lost, Kavanaugh will overturn Roe v. Wade.
 
You Democrats force nominees to play cat and mouse. Of course nominees are going to be evasive when blowhard Democrats ask questions they shouldn't be allowed to ask in the first place.

Your side lost, Kavanaugh will overturn Roe v. Wade.

sure goy boy, sure , now go lick a cross
 
Asshole democrats who tried to destroy Kavanaugh life because they believed the biggest liar in Congress stupid shit Schumer.
 
this is why republican appointed judges are better - they are not activists. they believe in the constitution and not judicial activism, unlike liberal anti-constitution judges.
 
this is why republican appointed judges are better - they are not activists. they believe in the constitution and not judicial activism, unlike liberal anti-constitution judges.

Another fucking idiot speaks. Most of the judges were appointed by Republicans.
 
Asshole democrats who tried to destroy Kavanaugh life because they believed the biggest liar in Congress stupid shit Schumer.

Hey dumbfuck, if that were even close to true Kavanaugh would not have lied so much, and the Repugnant ones would have let all of the witnesses testify.
 
Back
Top