Roe V Wade has been overturned.

you moved the goal post. All states allow abortion to save the life of the pregnant women



your use of completely is a lie - you are a liar. you have to always result to bullshit - maybe you should look into the defect inside of you that makes you do this

. "All states allow abortion to save the life of the pregnant women"

Link??
 
A misogynist playing the race card. How... expected.

He is stating the truth, check Guttmacher for the facts.

Maybe instead of using abortion as contraception, the use of implants like Nexplanon will become far more widespread?

Gary Franks: Black babies are nearly 40% of US abortions

Franks_Gary.jpg

Is there something wrong with this picture — nearly 40% of all abortions in America since Roe vs. Wade have been from Black Americans? This equates to more than 20 million Black pregnancies aborted. That would be the equivalent to either the populations of New York or Florida. Yet, Black people make up just 14% of the U.S. White people account for 35% of all abortions as the majority population in the country.

Is it because Black people have suffered more cases of incest, rape, or mothers in need to abort due to the threat of death? I think not.

So why is this happening? Is it a silent genocide within America? After all abortions would amount to a 50% reduction of the Black population. Today, there are 46 million Black Americans.

I supported the so-called pro-choice position while in Congress. These are votes I regret today and pray for God’s forgiveness on so many levels.

I am not declaring Planned Parenthood during the early part of the 20th century a racist organization, and definitely not today. But you can judge for yourself based on the content of this column.

Planned Parenthood has appointed about half of its presidents from minority communities. In its early days, it succeeded in enlisting the support of many if not most of the Black leaders during that period. Today every member of the Congressional Black Caucus supports Planned Parenthood. So how could it be racist? One could argue.

But digging deeper into the research one discovers that its founder, Margaret Sanger, wrote about the “Negro Project” or “Problem” in terms akin to believers of eugenics.

https://www.standard.net/opinion/na...s-black-babies-are-nearly-40-of-us-abortions/
 
Last edited:
Gun rights are not 100% unrestricted despite the federal constitution. District of Columbia v. Heller. "It also stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that guns and gun ownership would continue to be regulated."

no they are 100% PROTECTED. murdering babies is 100% NOT.
 
I would argue the actions of the political parties is separate from the argument over the constitutionality of R v W. As far as the political parties in Congress, generally the bills they create around abortion they know will never pass and are used as red meat for the base. Could the two parties work together and come up something enough people can agree upon? It would be very tough but possibly doable. Polling shows there’s nuance in the abortion debate. Not everyone thinks there should be no abortion or everyone should have the right up to nine months.

Nope. The only reason Roe v. Wade has been overturned is political. Period. Full stop. McConnell refused to do his Constitutional duty and consider the Supreme Court nominee advanced by the President. Can the two parties work together? Please. We found out yesterday that SIX sitting members of Congress asked for pardons. You ask for a pardon when you've committed a crime. The corruption of the GOP is deep and broad. The GOP has one interest...... keeping white Christians in power. They have no interest in compromise. None.
 
The decision was not well written. I don't even disagree with that. That being said there was an opening for the Court to rectify that and leave the right intact. Ultimately, that's just an excuse for what is happening here. White men are seizing power in this country and bringing women and minorities to heel, and those that could stop this lack the courage and the understanding of what needs to be done. Democrats are too interested being polite and not interested enough in kicking these guys in the nuts.

While I agree that Democrats are too polite, they also face a different peril in being as pugnacious as Republicans are.

For some reason, Democrats don't know how to do it in such a way as to not come across like they're throwing hissy fits, or like a bunch of sissies having a cat fight.

Maybe it's the kind of people Democrats tend to elect, but guys like Chuck Schumer and Adam Schiff just cannot pull off the old "macho tough guy" rhetoric that your average fat, gruff, jowly Republican asshole can.

And let's face it.... Americans do not like sissy men.

That, plus Democrats find themselves working on behalf of groups who, though entitled to equal protection, tend to make news for things a lot of centrist types don't go along with.

Like the whole cancel culture thing. Woke mentality. Calling for defunding the police while crime is rampant. Demonizing and criminalizing police officers who used deadly force after being placed in that situation by someone who refused to cooperate peacefully to begin with.

Agree or not, those things are not even popular with a lot of registered Democrats, much less undecided and independent voters.

Democrats walk a much finer line than Republicans.
 
He is stating the truth, check Guttmacher for the facts. Maybe instead of using abortion as contraception, the use of implants will become far more widespread?

It has nothing to do with the topic of Roe v. Wade being overturned. It was an attempted diversion.
 
What you are seeing is a reaction to the country moving too far to the Left. Like a pendulum, America's politics swing to one side, then the other. What happens is whichever the direction it is swinging, it always goes too far and then moves back towards the Center. That's what you're seeing at the moment. Biden and the Progressive arm of the Democrat party pushed too hard and fast to the Left and the nation is pushing back, like it or not.
 
Bull shit, the constitution does not address abortion, and you have never read it, either.

Le Sigh - It addresses your right to life and liberty. If you are gonna die carrying a child to term, no state law can prevent you from saving your life

so you are a fucking retard - as always - 1+1 = 2 BTW
 
Bull shit, the constitution does not address abortion, and you have never read it, either.

The Constitution says NOTHING about your right to life. These fucking idiots are brain dead.

You do have a right to due process, so this balance between the rights of the fetus at various stages in development is a legitimate one. But they have no interest in a nuanced discussion.
 
Back
Top