RNC adopts resolution condemning white supremacists

he equivicated in case some where there as non-Nazis to protest the statue removal.
But he condemned the violence and that's really all that matters

no it is not



you dont get to decidee that racist


he should do what the republican party did


WE DONT WANT YOUR VOTE AND WILL WORK AGAINST YOU IN EVERY WAY


you mad at the republicans elites who said that in your party voice?
 
trying to follow what you say here..I think the fault lies with the cops for allowing them to get together.
They should have been separated at all times
But yes bringing bats and flamethrowers to a demonstration is odious.

I guess we can both agree that the situation was handled badly, after the fact, and violence and hatred has no place in our society.
What's the answer though? If the cops would have kept the counter protesters sidelined, they might have been attacked as well. Cops have to be super sensitive these days is my guess.

edit, re guns...2nd A permit.
 
I guess we can both agree that the situation was handled badly, after the fact, and violence and hatred has no place in our society.
What's the answer though? If the cops would have kept the counter protesters sidelined, they might have been attacked as well. Cops have to be super sensitive these days is my guess.

edit, re guns...2nd A permit.

why do nyou people refuse to admitt the FACTS


the nazi fucks BROKE THE AGREEMENT OF THEIR PROTEST PERMITT


they were supposed to enter the Park they reserved from a certain street



they filtered all through the town, down all the streets instead so they could confront the counter protestors


yet you evil shits pretend that didnt happen so you can blame the counter protestors.


fucking racists
 
I would love to


You see I have facts to prove my positions unlike you


I love facts and respect them unlike you.
 
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/news/la-pn-supreme-court-rnc-voter-fraud-20130114


Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree
January 14, 2013|By David G. Savage



The Supreme Court refused to lift a consent decree that bars the Republican… (Caroyln Kaster / Associated…)
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.
The justices without comment turned down an appeal from RNC lawyers who said the decree has become “antiquated” and is “increasingly used as political weapon” by Democrats during national campaigns.
For their part, lawyers for the Democratic National Committee had argued that recent campaigns show the “consent degree remains necessary today.”
The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.
 
Wrong on both counts.

The Dallas shooter was rejected and blacklisted by several black groups, including BLM, because of his past. I've already posted that truth, but if you need it again, I'll post it again.

This is the guy who shot the congressman ...

1497455232943.png


Both were loners .. no connection to any group.

It is indeed telling that you have to scrap up people to claim that BLM and antifa are violent, in fact, it's a clear demonstration that neither group is.

Thanks

How about the BLM sympathizer who assassinated 2 cops in NYC? I could go on. All were influenced and persuaded by these 2 terrorist groups.
 
why do nyou people refuse to admitt the FACTS


the nazi fucks BROKE THE AGREEMENT OF THEIR PROTEST PERMITT


they were supposed to enter the Park they reserved from a certain street



they filtered all through the town, down all the streets instead so they could confront the counter protestors


yet you evil shits pretend that didnt happen so you can blame the counter protestors.


fucking racists


u r rayciss

u dont get 2 call any1 else rayciss

got it?

NO and we dont let racists define racism

now go get the proof that proves ur claim
 
why do nyou people refuse to admitt the FACTS


the nazi fucks BROKE THE AGREEMENT OF THEIR PROTEST PERMITT


they were supposed to enter the Park they reserved from a certain street



they filtered all through the town, down all the streets instead so they could confront the counter protestors


yet you evil shits pretend that didnt happen so you can blame the counter protestors.


fucking racists

the NAZIs marched on the cou terprotestors assholes.


they lied about what they would do under their permit


the counter protestors are allowed to walk anywhere on the street


theyn dont need a permit


they have a right to walk down the street and say "WE DONT LIKE RACISTS OF ANY ILK"


then nazis wanted to fight thoise peoplen so they marched on them.


anyone whon says both sides like trumpy did is lying
 
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/news/la-pn-supreme-court-rnc-voter-fraud-20130114


Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree
January 14, 2013|By David G. Savage



The Supreme Court refused to lift a consent decree that bars the Republican… (Caroyln Kaster / Associated…)
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.
The justices without comment turned down an appeal from RNC lawyers who said the decree has become “antiquated” and is “increasingly used as political weapon” by Democrats during national campaigns.
For their part, lawyers for the Democratic National Committee had argued that recent campaigns show the “consent degree remains necessary today.”
The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.


that duznt say what u claimed it did rayciss liar


we didnt lose


your party cheated


ID laws


gerrymandering


your fucks cheat


its all in the court records assface

u r a rayciss who liez
 
How about the BLM sympathizer who assassinated 2 cops in NYC? I could go on. All were influenced and persuaded by these 2 terrorist groups.

You could go on??? You haven't even named ONE.

Now you're down to 'influenced' and 'sympathizer' because you have no actual demonstration of either group being violent.

Thanks again.
 
How about the BLM sympathizer who assassinated 2 cops in NYC? I could go on. All were influenced and persuaded by these 2 terrorist groups.


how duz a pic of somebodys dl prove they arent antifa or blm? :dunno:

o i know

blackasshole must think becuz the illinois secretary of state iz named jesse white that must mean James T. Hodgkinson cant be motivated by or belong 2 the alt left :rofl2:



We’ve been hearing a lot about “right-wing violence” lately. If we’re to believe our alleged moral, ethical, and intellectual betters, there’s a Klansman on every street corner and a Nazi under every bed.

There’s nothing more terrifying than a “white nationalist” who lives in his mom’s basement, which is why it’s okay for feral Antifa children to beat these guys up and drench them with balloons filled with piss. That’s just “opposing hate.”

But what happens when an act of violence is irrefutably motivated by left-wing ideology? What happens if, for example, a Bernie Bro named James T. Hodgkinson shoots at a bunch of congressmen for the explicit reason that he hates Republicans and wants them dead?

http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/22/j...ve-scalise-already-being-erased-from-history/


I think the libz r sad that Hodgkinson didn’t succeed.
 
Remember when George W. used his secret weather machine to steer Katrina into NOLA? Because he didn't like black people.

Naw. Due to his massive incompetence, he merely fucked up an adequate response.

But, go ahead and keep apologizing for his bungling, just as you do for Orangetweet.
 
Last edited:
in their minds Zimmerman had a right to wander arround and look for a child to intimidate with a gun at night BUT Trayvon had no right to protect himself when attacked by said man.


they are blatent racists who then claim NO ACT OF RACISM is indeed racism.


get shot in your church by an idiot with a gun for being black ?

thats not racism
 
in their minds Zimmerman had a right to wander arround and look for a child to intimidate with a gun at night BUT Trayvon had no right to protect himself when attacked by said man.


they are blatent racists who then claim NO ACT OF RACISM is indeed racism.


get shot in your church by an idiot with a gun for being black ?

thats not racism


what r u ranting about now u rayciss?

r u a tweaker or something?
 
Back
Top