That's a good thing having liberals distorted and lied about white supremist support of trump back when he was running for president made it a necessary thing to do. White supremist have never been part of the Republican Party they've always been apart of the democratic party the KKK was born from them. The problem is that the DNC doesn't condemn the radical assholes that attach themselves to their party no instead they embrace them they give them a platform.
RNC adopts resolution condemning white supremacists
- Thread starter blackascoal
- Start date
Русский агент
Путин - мl
evince
Truthmatters
at what level do Americans of color vote democratic?
what percent vote republican.
those facts themselves prove the republican party is the racist party.
Americans people of color think your platform ideas are racist
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
:0) Stupid as fuck.
Racists have been an integral part of the Republican Party since the 'Southern Strategy.' I guess you thought nobody knows this.
Are you suggesting the racist scum voted for Hillary Clinton, not Trump?
Mindboggling ignorance.
It's the same thing. Just as ISIS sympathizers attack targets. IE Pulse nightclub.
But go ahead keep pulling the wool over your eyes. Its easy to stay in the bubble you have created for yourself.
Where Antifa and BLM are great people.
Русский агент
Путин - мl
A myth about conservatism is circulating in academia and journalism.
It goes something like this: the Republican Party assembled a national majority by winning over Southern white voters; Southern white voters are racist; therefore, the GOP is racist.
Sometimes the conclusion is softened, and Republicans are convicted merely of base opportunism: the GOP is the party that became willing to pander to racists.
This myth is not the only viewpoint in scholarly debates on the subject. B
It is so pervasive in mass media reporting on racial issues that an NBC news anchor can casually speak of "a new era for the Republican Party." It has become a staple of Democrat politicians who accuse Republicans of dividing Americans against each other, stirring up racial prejudices and bringing out the worst in people through the use of so-called racist "codewords."
All this matters because people use such putative connections to form judgments, and "racist" is as toxic a reputation as one can have.
Now to be sure, the GOP had a Southern strategy. Willing to work with, rather than against, the grain of Southern opinion, local Republicans ran some segregationist candidates in the 1960s. From the 1950s on, virtually all national and local GOP candidates tried to craft policies and messages that could compete for the votes of some pretty unsavory characters. This record is incontestable. A party acted expediently in an often nasty political context.
The myth is much bolder than this. It insists that these events should decisively shape our understanding of conservatism and the modern Republican Party. It is only a short step to the Democrats' insinuation that the GOP did not merely seek votes expediently; it made a pact with America's devil.
The mythmakers typically draw on two types of evidence. First, they argue that the GOP deliberately crafted its core messages to accommodate Southern racists. Second, they find "proof" in the electoral pudding: the GOP captured the core of the Southern white backlash vote. Neither type of evidence is persuasive.
The GOP's policy positions are not sugar-coated racist appeals. Election results show that the GOP became the South's dominant party in the least racist phase of the region's history, and got that way as the party of the more socially conservative, openly patriotic middle-class.
http://www.claremont.org/crb/article/the-myth-of-the-racist-republicans/
It goes something like this: the Republican Party assembled a national majority by winning over Southern white voters; Southern white voters are racist; therefore, the GOP is racist.
Sometimes the conclusion is softened, and Republicans are convicted merely of base opportunism: the GOP is the party that became willing to pander to racists.
This myth is not the only viewpoint in scholarly debates on the subject. B
It is so pervasive in mass media reporting on racial issues that an NBC news anchor can casually speak of "a new era for the Republican Party." It has become a staple of Democrat politicians who accuse Republicans of dividing Americans against each other, stirring up racial prejudices and bringing out the worst in people through the use of so-called racist "codewords."
All this matters because people use such putative connections to form judgments, and "racist" is as toxic a reputation as one can have.
Now to be sure, the GOP had a Southern strategy. Willing to work with, rather than against, the grain of Southern opinion, local Republicans ran some segregationist candidates in the 1960s. From the 1950s on, virtually all national and local GOP candidates tried to craft policies and messages that could compete for the votes of some pretty unsavory characters. This record is incontestable. A party acted expediently in an often nasty political context.
The myth is much bolder than this. It insists that these events should decisively shape our understanding of conservatism and the modern Republican Party. It is only a short step to the Democrats' insinuation that the GOP did not merely seek votes expediently; it made a pact with America's devil.
The mythmakers typically draw on two types of evidence. First, they argue that the GOP deliberately crafted its core messages to accommodate Southern racists. Second, they find "proof" in the electoral pudding: the GOP captured the core of the Southern white backlash vote. Neither type of evidence is persuasive.
The GOP's policy positions are not sugar-coated racist appeals. Election results show that the GOP became the South's dominant party in the least racist phase of the region's history, and got that way as the party of the more socially conservative, openly patriotic middle-class.
http://www.claremont.org/crb/article/the-myth-of-the-racist-republicans/
how duz a pic of somebodys dl prove they arent antifa or blm?
o i know
blackasshole must think becuz the illinois secretary of state iz named jesse white that must mean James T. Hodgkinson cant be motivated by or belong 2 the alt left
We’ve been hearing a lot about “right-wing violence” lately. If we’re to believe our alleged moral, ethical, and intellectual betters, there’s a Klansman on every street corner and a Nazi under every bed.
There’s nothing more terrifying than a “white nationalist” who lives in his mom’s basement, which is why it’s okay for feral Antifa children to beat these guys up and drench them with balloons filled with piss. That’s just “opposing hate.”
But what happens when an act of violence is irrefutably motivated by left-wing ideology? What happens if, for example, a Bernie Bro named James T. Hodgkinson shoots at a bunch of congressmen for the explicit reason that he hates Republicans and wants them dead?
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/22/j...ve-scalise-already-being-erased-from-history/
I think the libz r sad that Hodgkinson didn’t succeed.
Yea but hodgkinson was just punching Nazi's with a gun. So it is justified!
Русский агент
Путин - мl
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
They indeed are great people. Thanks again.
ISIS, like your teammates, the klan, neo-nazis, and white supremacists all have LONG histories of violence. BLM and antifa have no such histories .. thus, anyone influenced by them would be using direct non-violent confrontation .. not the violence of your teammates.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Hardly a fair comparison since the Klan is over a hundred years old---and the vast majority of their violence was done before any of the newbie Klansmen were born.
But even with their short histories, these *radical* leftist groups will start to catch up. Just give them time.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
So lets blame them now for things they haven't done, but might do somewhere in time.
The obvious is just OBVIOUS.
Republicans are desperate to blame the left for supporting mindlessly racist groups and elements that the right has been supporting for decades.
The OBVIOUS.
Oops, there it is. Another member of the Illiterate Dumbfuck Club. Add a distorted view of history and you have another RW ignoramus.
Congrats, Illiterate Dumbfuck!
evince
Truthmatters
until you can attract 50 % of the voters of color you can not claim the Democratic party is racist
until you can attract more than like 5% of the Americans of colors votes you will be known as the racist party.
crying wontn change that
being little frances' wont change that
You are not the authorities on racism
you are the racists people study
:lol: You heard it here folks. BAC just endorsed BLM/Antifa as great people. He believes burning down cities, starting riots because a speaker is coming, stabbing a police horse with a nail, and killing LE are good things, and good people!
evince
Truthmatters
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...p-charlottesville_us_59905c7ee4b08a2472750701
POLITICS 08/13/2017 12:15 pm ET
Neo-Nazi Site Daily Stormer Praises Trump’s Charlottesville Reaction: ‘He Loves Us All’
“When asked to condemn, he just walked out of the room. Really, really good. God bless him,” wrote the website’s founder.
By Dominique Mosbergen
POLITICS 08/13/2017 12:15 pm ET
Neo-Nazi Site Daily Stormer Praises Trump’s Charlottesville Reaction: ‘He Loves Us All’
“When asked to condemn, he just walked out of the room. Really, really good. God bless him,” wrote the website’s founder.
By Dominique Mosbergen
Darth Omar
Russian asset
The things with liberals is they never play fair lol.
If the right owns *the loner* Dylan Roof, then the left and BLM should own the cop assassins. But they don't and never will.
So I refuse to play their game, and the Republicans in the OP should have refused as well. For the RNC to denounce white supremacists to satisfy liberals, is to play right into liberals hands. Because it's a tacit concession that liberals are right about the Republican Party being over run with racists and racist sympathizers.
They won't be satisfied with their denouncement---not even for a minute, because what they are after is the 'I told you so'.
It amazes me people in the RNC can't see that.
canceled.2021.3
Former Vice President
Why do we have to? Aren't some things self evident?
Also, what Trump was trying to say is that not everyone marching was a member of the KKK or some white nationalist group. Some people were there to genuinely protest the taking down of a statue for no good reason. You may disagree with it, but that is a fact.
But I have not come to expect honesty from the deranged like you. Subtlety is not a strength of those with Trump Derangement Syndrome.
canceled.2021.3
Former Vice President
They have Stockholm Syndrome. They think that if they just try to be nice maybe the liberals will be nice to them and the media will go easy on them. They merely show weakness. Look how McCain and Romney were shredded when they ran for President. To a lefty the only "good Republican" is one bashing a conservative. Other than that, they have no use for them.
McCain was called a racist and so was Romney.
I am with you. I don't dance to anyones demands. Fuck these people. They have Threedee, Caromney and DamoCain to virtue signal for them. That is enough
why?
If the cops get attacked they tear gas and bash heads -what's wrong with that?
We knew this back n the 60-70's as part of anti-war demonstrations.
Throwing rocks at cops means you get attacked by cops.
That's not a lot of fun, but it's 100% rational
Canceled.2018.1
Canceled
I question whether the outcome could have been different and was not necessarily criticizing the cops.