Rittenhouse gets standing ovation at conservative conference

Again, why would they wish to trick?

I have a thing about people lying under oath.

He's not enrolled, period. The university has no reason to lie about that. Besides, it could easily be discovered and reported on, which would make them look like lying idiots. In other words, much like the drop-out punk killer and his defenders.
 
Wow. You’ve done a 180° turnaround from what you posted before the verdict. Very nice.
Nope. I haven't. Nothing has changed. He murdered two people, and immediately tried to go to the cops.

They weren't the least bit interested in the murderer, and the city will pay in a civil trial.
 
Take your meds . You are hallucinating again. :laugh:
He fantasized on tape about 'shooting looters'. He then got an illegal gun and went to a BLM march. He was disappointed because things quieted down, so he threatened numerous people until one of them approached him.
 
Premeditated murder and suspected scenario where self defense was probably going to be necessary, arent the same thing. But im sure you know that deep in your putrid soul.
Judge didn't allow key pieces of evidence that will be allowed in a civil trial.

Proof of premeditation, for one.
 
Yep. Like this.

wknRl9Q.jpg


Civil trials have a lower standard of evidence, as well.

Rittenhouse's acquittal was not the slam dunk that the Reichwingers believe. The jury deliberated over a period of days, and sent for further information several times.
He was recorded when he fantasized about shooting looters. A real judge will allow that in court.
 
He was recorded when he fantasized about shooting looters. A real judge will allow that in court.

Yes. And it certainly will be allowed in a civil trial. So will his statements and social media posts prior to the killings, and so will his penchant for violence. There's a video out there of him chasing after a girl and punching her, just a couple weeks before the killings. He apparently goes to Kenosha looking for trouble.
 
Yes. And it certainly will be allowed in a civil trial. So will his statements and social media posts prior to the killings, and so will his penchant for violence. There's a video out there of him chasing after a girl and punching her, just a couple weeks before the killings. He apparently goes to Kenosha looking for trouble.
It was obvious that he was looking for trouble. Watch the video of him stalking innocents with his gun pointed at random passersby
 
Kyle Rittenhouse trial: Gaige Grosskreutz says he pointed gun ...https://www.washingtonpost.com › nation › 2021/11/08
Nov 8, 2021 — Kenosha, Wis., shooting victim Gaige Grosskreutz testified on Nov. 9 that he pointed a gun at Kyle Rittenhouse before getting shot.
Nope. He clarified that after. He denounced the attorney's tricks. He said 'correct' when the attorney said 'as you approached him'.

Why would he say he pointed the gun, when there is video proof of the opposite?
 
Yes. And it certainly will be allowed in a civil trial. So will his statements and social media posts prior to the killings, and so will his penchant for violence. There's a video out there of him chasing after a girl and punching her, just a couple weeks before the killings. He apparently goes to Kenosha looking for trouble.

Correlation fallacy with an unsubstantiated claim. The way you slime faggots talk, it was likely a older cousin and they were playing.

We all know children play knife-fight all the time, right?

Literally heard these junky slime fagots try that argument...
 
Even if this guy was a white supremacist, he'd only be a white supremacist sorrounded by gender-ethno-masochists, racists, misandrists, pederasts, heroin cartels, and chicago mafia. Give us all one good reason to play favorites.
 
Back
Top