Right wing fuck you and your faith based

Topspin

Verified User
Just heard supertool Steven Baldwin debating Ron Paul on King and Paul crushed his christian uneducated head in.
For all you faith baised retards, go back to your church and you child molesting preachers.:clink:
 
Not of value, other than showing how useless the moral right now has been exposed as.

considering that I don't know who steven baldwin is, unless you're talking about the dufus actor, nor am I part of the 'moral right wing' or christian majority (whatever it's called nowadays), I'd say my emote was spot on.
 
he is indeed the dufus actor, everytime a serious activist or congressman appears on TV they bring out some nut job like baldwin or king asshole Glenn Beck.
My bad on the christian thing, very many righties are bible thumpers.
 
Glen Beck is not your typical rightwinger. He talks about the travesty of "too big to fail"ism that is transforming most republicans into big government fascists like topspin.
 
Just heard supertool Steven Baldwin debating Ron Paul on King and Paul crushed his christian uneducated head in.
For all you faith baised retards, go back to your church and you child molesting preachers.:clink:

LOL

Top was a victim of child molestation, Father Flanigan convinced him to suck his cock by giving him weed. He quit the church, but still likes to suck cock and smoke weed at the same time.
 
As a psychologist, I am often amazed at the level of energy and amount of time spent by "non-believers" to denounce God, rail on Christianity, and make fun of those who do believe, and aren't afraid to profess their faith. I mean, it's quite ironic, they go to such lengths to attack something they claim not to believe.

I don't believe in the Easter Bunny, and I don't think I have ever spent a second of my time, looking for debates between believers and non-believers of the furry critter. I suppose I could Google and search out some obscure forum where this debate was happening, but why? I know the Easter Bunny is not real, so what would be my purpose in arguing with someone who thought the opposite? If I ran across a YouTube debate between a washed up B-film actor and some flaky politician or talk show host, discussing the existence or non-existence of the Easter Bunny, it wouldn't interest me in the least, and I would just pass it on by.

So, I have to ponder the question, why do so many self-proclaimed Atheists, feel compelled to spend enormous amounts of their personal time and energy, debating the subject of God? My hypothesis has led to the theory that, they really DO believe in a God, they are just in denial of that fact. Most of them do know God exists, they are just angry at God for some reason. Since they understand that God can't be proven because He requires us to have faith in His existence, they challenge God... much like you may challenge a Vampire to come out during the daylight! It's not that you don't believe in the Vampire, it's that you know he can't come out into the daylight. So, you can mock him, criticize him, claim he doesn't really exist, trash him in every way, call him every name in the book, and as long as it's daylight, you are safe from his reprisal, so you're fearless! Maybe this is a poor analogy, but I really think it illustrates the typical "Atheist" behavior.
 
As a psychologist, I am often amazed at the level of energy and amount of time spent by "non-believers" to denounce God, rail on Christianity, and make fun of those who do believe, and aren't afraid to profess their faith. I mean, it's quite ironic, they go to such lengths to attack something they claim not to believe.

I don't believe in the Easter Bunny, and I don't think I have ever spent a second of my time, looking for debates between believers and non-believers of the furry critter. I suppose I could Google and search out some obscure forum where this debate was happening, but why? I know the Easter Bunny is not real, so what would be my purpose in arguing with someone who thought the opposite? If I ran across a YouTube debate between a washed up B-film actor and some flaky politician or talk show host, discussing the existence or non-existence of the Easter Bunny, it wouldn't interest me in the least, and I would just pass it on by.

So, I have to ponder the question, why do so many self-proclaimed Atheists, feel compelled to spend enormous amounts of their personal time and energy, debating the subject of God? My hypothesis has led to the theory that, they really DO believe in a God, they are just in denial of that fact. Most of them do know God exists, they are just angry at God for some reason. Since they understand that God can't be proven because He requires us to have faith in His existence, they challenge God... much like you may challenge a Vampire to come out during the daylight! It's not that you don't believe in the Vampire, it's that you know he can't come out into the daylight. So, you can mock him, criticize him, claim he doesn't really exist, trash him in every way, call him every name in the book, and as long as it's daylight, you are safe from his reprisal, so you're fearless! Maybe this is a poor analogy, but I really think it illustrates the typical "Atheist" behavior.

Well, according to the biblical teaching of mans condition, this anger is to be expected. Romans 8:7

So I think your analysis is spot on.
 
Dixie's not a psychologist. He has an undergraduate degree in Psych and works in newspapers doing page layout or something.
 
I actually have a masters in psychology. i have undergraduate degrees in business administration and journalism. I don't have a doctorate in psychology, but I could get one without much trouble. Since I don't plan to hang a shingle and listen to emo retards like Waterhead tell me about their mother's, I won't bother with that. But the knowledge does come in handy for everyday life. Incidentally, I do work for a newspaper owned by Gannett, where I am a city desk editor. It's really just a job to keep me busy, as I am semi-retired, I sold my business of 20 years, and have a small fortune from that. I'm glad you guys are so interested in my personal life, but I really fail to see what it has to do with this topic of discussion... can you enlighten me on that?
 
As a LUNATIC psychologist, I am often amazed at the level of energy and amount of time spent by "non-believers" to denounce God, rail on Christianity, and make fun of those who do believe, and aren't afraid to profess their faith. I mean, it's quite ironic, they go to such lengths to attack something they claim not to believe.

I don't believe in the Easter Bunny, and I don't think I have ever spent a second of my time, looking for debates between believers and non-believers of the furry critter. I suppose I could Google and search out some obscure forum where this debate was happening, but why? I know the Easter Bunny is not real, so what would be my purpose in arguing with someone who thought the opposite? If I ran across a YouTube debate between a washed up B-film actor and some flaky politician or talk show host, discussing the existence or non-existence of the Easter Bunny, it wouldn't interest me in the least, and I would just pass it on by.

So, I have to ponder the question, why do so many self-proclaimed Atheists, feel compelled to spend enormous amounts of their personal time and energy, debating the subject of God? My hypothesis has led to the theory that, they really DO believe in a God, they are just in denial of that fact. Most of them do know God exists, they are just angry at God for some reason. Since they understand that God can't be proven because He requires us to have faith in His existence, they challenge God... much like you may challenge a Vampire to come out during the daylight! It's not that you don't believe in the Vampire, it's that you know he can't come out into the daylight. So, you can mock him, criticize him, claim he doesn't really exist, trash him in every way, call him every name in the book, and as long as it's daylight, you are safe from his reprisal, so you're fearless! Maybe this is a poor analogy, but I really think it illustrates the typical "Atheist" behavior.

Fixed that for you Dixie.
 
As a psychologist, I am often amazed at the level of energy and amount of time spent by "non-believers" to denounce God, rail on Christianity, and make fun of those who do believe, and aren't afraid to profess their faith. I mean, it's quite ironic, they go to such lengths to attack something they claim not to believe.

I don't believe in the Easter Bunny, and I don't think I have ever spent a second of my time, looking for debates between believers and non-believers of the furry critter. I suppose I could Google and search out some obscure forum where this debate was happening, but why? I know the Easter Bunny is not real, so what would be my purpose in arguing with someone who thought the opposite? If I ran across a YouTube debate between a washed up B-film actor and some flaky politician or talk show host, discussing the existence or non-existence of the Easter Bunny, it wouldn't interest me in the least, and I would just pass it on by.

So, I have to ponder the question, why do so many self-proclaimed Atheists, feel compelled to spend enormous amounts of their personal time and energy, debating the subject of God? My hypothesis has led to the theory that, they really DO believe in a God, they are just in denial of that fact. Most of them do know God exists, they are just angry at God for some reason. Since they understand that God can't be proven because He requires us to have faith in His existence, they challenge God... much like you may challenge a Vampire to come out during the daylight! It's not that you don't believe in the Vampire, it's that you know he can't come out into the daylight. So, you can mock him, criticize him, claim he doesn't really exist, trash him in every way, call him every name in the book, and as long as it's daylight, you are safe from his reprisal, so you're fearless! Maybe this is a poor analogy, but I really think it illustrates the typical "Atheist" behavior.

The believers in the Easter Bunny never tried to make laws to force their beliefs on the general public.
 
Back
Top