Not of value, other than showing how useless the moral right now has been exposed as.
Just heard supertool Steven Baldwin debating Ron Paul on King and Paul crushed his christian uneducated head in.
For all you faith baised retards, go back to your church and you child molesting preachers.![]()
your a bunch of redneck jesus believers
Glenn beck is the white trash spokesman
As a psychologist, I am often amazed at the level of energy and amount of time spent by "non-believers" to denounce God, rail on Christianity, and make fun of those who do believe, and aren't afraid to profess their faith. I mean, it's quite ironic, they go to such lengths to attack something they claim not to believe.
I don't believe in the Easter Bunny, and I don't think I have ever spent a second of my time, looking for debates between believers and non-believers of the furry critter. I suppose I could Google and search out some obscure forum where this debate was happening, but why? I know the Easter Bunny is not real, so what would be my purpose in arguing with someone who thought the opposite? If I ran across a YouTube debate between a washed up B-film actor and some flaky politician or talk show host, discussing the existence or non-existence of the Easter Bunny, it wouldn't interest me in the least, and I would just pass it on by.
So, I have to ponder the question, why do so many self-proclaimed Atheists, feel compelled to spend enormous amounts of their personal time and energy, debating the subject of God? My hypothesis has led to the theory that, they really DO believe in a God, they are just in denial of that fact. Most of them do know God exists, they are just angry at God for some reason. Since they understand that God can't be proven because He requires us to have faith in His existence, they challenge God... much like you may challenge a Vampire to come out during the daylight! It's not that you don't believe in the Vampire, it's that you know he can't come out into the daylight. So, you can mock him, criticize him, claim he doesn't really exist, trash him in every way, call him every name in the book, and as long as it's daylight, you are safe from his reprisal, so you're fearless! Maybe this is a poor analogy, but I really think it illustrates the typical "Atheist" behavior.
An undergraduate degree in psychology, also known as toilet paper.
As a LUNATIC psychologist, I am often amazed at the level of energy and amount of time spent by "non-believers" to denounce God, rail on Christianity, and make fun of those who do believe, and aren't afraid to profess their faith. I mean, it's quite ironic, they go to such lengths to attack something they claim not to believe.
I don't believe in the Easter Bunny, and I don't think I have ever spent a second of my time, looking for debates between believers and non-believers of the furry critter. I suppose I could Google and search out some obscure forum where this debate was happening, but why? I know the Easter Bunny is not real, so what would be my purpose in arguing with someone who thought the opposite? If I ran across a YouTube debate between a washed up B-film actor and some flaky politician or talk show host, discussing the existence or non-existence of the Easter Bunny, it wouldn't interest me in the least, and I would just pass it on by.
So, I have to ponder the question, why do so many self-proclaimed Atheists, feel compelled to spend enormous amounts of their personal time and energy, debating the subject of God? My hypothesis has led to the theory that, they really DO believe in a God, they are just in denial of that fact. Most of them do know God exists, they are just angry at God for some reason. Since they understand that God can't be proven because He requires us to have faith in His existence, they challenge God... much like you may challenge a Vampire to come out during the daylight! It's not that you don't believe in the Vampire, it's that you know he can't come out into the daylight. So, you can mock him, criticize him, claim he doesn't really exist, trash him in every way, call him every name in the book, and as long as it's daylight, you are safe from his reprisal, so you're fearless! Maybe this is a poor analogy, but I really think it illustrates the typical "Atheist" behavior.
As a psychologist, I am often amazed at the level of energy and amount of time spent by "non-believers" to denounce God, rail on Christianity, and make fun of those who do believe, and aren't afraid to profess their faith. I mean, it's quite ironic, they go to such lengths to attack something they claim not to believe.
I don't believe in the Easter Bunny, and I don't think I have ever spent a second of my time, looking for debates between believers and non-believers of the furry critter. I suppose I could Google and search out some obscure forum where this debate was happening, but why? I know the Easter Bunny is not real, so what would be my purpose in arguing with someone who thought the opposite? If I ran across a YouTube debate between a washed up B-film actor and some flaky politician or talk show host, discussing the existence or non-existence of the Easter Bunny, it wouldn't interest me in the least, and I would just pass it on by.
So, I have to ponder the question, why do so many self-proclaimed Atheists, feel compelled to spend enormous amounts of their personal time and energy, debating the subject of God? My hypothesis has led to the theory that, they really DO believe in a God, they are just in denial of that fact. Most of them do know God exists, they are just angry at God for some reason. Since they understand that God can't be proven because He requires us to have faith in His existence, they challenge God... much like you may challenge a Vampire to come out during the daylight! It's not that you don't believe in the Vampire, it's that you know he can't come out into the daylight. So, you can mock him, criticize him, claim he doesn't really exist, trash him in every way, call him every name in the book, and as long as it's daylight, you are safe from his reprisal, so you're fearless! Maybe this is a poor analogy, but I really think it illustrates the typical "Atheist" behavior.