Right to bear arms!

[Jarod]

so what stopped the party they trusted with their vote for doing all these things for them? Why only give them a window?

Because the Right has been fighting them all along the way.

 

[Jarod]

Before that, after they were finally granted the vote, they were loyal to the Republicans who they credited with giving them freedom, while racist Democrats oppressed them with Jim Crow laws. That finally began changing around 1936 during Roosevelt's administration.

Since 1964 the GOP has been the party most often associated with bigotry.

Pepe-loving tsuke appears to be be ignorant of American history, or perhaps he is anticipating the wholesale revisionism he thinks Deplorable Don will usher in.

You can see how in 1964 the Southern whites began to switch partys from Democrat to Republican.

 

[Legion Troll]

when does a crime against property become a capital offense worthy of summary execution?

When martial law is in effect.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

You can see how in 1964 the Southern whites began to switch partys from Democrat to Republican.

how is it that largely democrat states/cities aren't racist by making it so that exercising the 2nd Amendment is impossible?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

When martial law is in effect.

link up

 

[evince]

You can see how in 1964 the Southern whites began to switch partys from Democrat to Republican.

they don't believe in history


or science


or math


or the constitution

 

[Legion Troll]

link up

You'll like this source, I think.

http://offgridsurvival.com/martiallaw-unitedstates/

 

[Legion Troll]

how is it that largely democrat states/cities aren't racist by making it so that exercising the 2nd Amendment is impossible?

Have these jurisdictions contravened the Constitution along racial lines? Link up.

 

[evince]

name one fucking place that made the 2nd impossible asshole liar

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Have these jurisdictions contravened the Constitution along racial lines? Link up.

find out who in NYC and California, even chicago prior to mcdonald, who was issued permits and who wasn't.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

name one fucking place that made the 2nd impossible asshole liar

Washington DC, Chicago prior to McDonald. hell, all of illinois until mcdonald. try to exercise your 2nd Amendment in California or NYC.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

You'll like this source, I think.

http://offgridsurvival.com/martiallaw-unitedstates/

so martial law has been an unconstitutional exercise from the get go. thought so.

 

[tsuke]

Because the Right has been fighting them all along the way.

didnt the democrats have a veto proof majority recently? how could the repubs fight that?

Also dont they support illegal immigration which competes with blacks.

 

[evince]

Washington DC, Chicago prior to McDonald. hell, all of illinois until mcdonald. try to exercise your 2nd Amendment in California or NYC.

go get proof

 

[evince]

didnt the democrats have a veto proof majority recently? how could the repubs fight that?

Also dont they support illegal immigration which competes with blacks.

when was that asshole


your party cheats in elections to keep the people enslaved

 

[Legion Troll]

so martial law has been an unconstitutional exercise from the get go. thought so.

It has?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Section_9

 

[Seahawk]

In America you have the right to bear arms, BUT especially if you are black, doing so gives the police the right to shoot and kill you.

Cite.

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk

 

[Legion Troll]

find out who in NYC and California, even chicago prior to mcdonald, who was issued permits and who wasn't.

You made the claim. Can you prove that only non-white citizens were denied their Second Amendment rights in NYC, California, and Chicago because of their race?

 

[CFM]

when does a crime against property become a capital offense worthy of summary execution?

The moment someone thinks that what another person owns is theirs to take.

It's not a crime against property. It's a crime against the person that owns the property.

 

[CFM]

was the gun planted there by the cops?

I'm sure that is your automatic thought since you hate police. If you think so, prove it. I've seen a picture that shows a gun despite witnesses saying he didn't have one. That means there is proof of a gun and you have no proof of you implication that it was planted. Anything else?