didnt the democrats have a veto proof majority recently? how could the repubs fight that?
Also dont they support illegal immigration which competes with blacks.
No.
and
No.
didnt the democrats have a veto proof majority recently? how could the repubs fight that?
Also dont they support illegal immigration which competes with blacks.
go get proof
if all the protestors are to blame for the few assholes who used the protests as cover for theft then all cops are to blame for every death.
right asshole
see hw stupid your fucking brains are
the witnesses say he was holding a book
the cops refuse to show the film
gee I wonder why
It has?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Section_9
I agree they should think bigger, we all should, it still does not change the fact that while they are better off now than ever before in America, they still are not in the best shape they can be in.
I also agree that they would be better off, all of us would be, if both parties competed for support.
I don't see how a man who thinks they are in the worst shape they have ever been can help us to make it better. If he cant acknowledge the gains thus far, he cant see clearly enough to help.
You made the claim. Can you prove that only non-white citizens were denied their Second Amendment rights in NYC, California, and Chicago because of their race?
I didn't say all are to blame yet you blame all the police.
How does it feel to know what you thought has been refuted? You should know since it happens to you regularly.
The moment someone thinks that what another person owns is theirs to take.
It's not a crime against property. It's a crime against the person that owns the property.
no I did not you fucking liar
so property crimes don't actually exist?
I'm sure that is your automatic thought since you hate police. If you think so, prove it. I've seen a picture that shows a gun despite witnesses saying he didn't have one. That means there is proof of a gun and you have no proof of you implication that it was planted. Anything else?
Never said they didn't exist. However, if you steal from me, you're committing a crime against ME not my property. That's worthy of getting shot.
i'll ask this question again, since nobody seemed to want to answer it.......isn't it police standard procedure that if you shoot an individual that has a gun, they move the gun far away from that persons reach, dead or not, so that it's not accessible or within reach? the only reasonable answer to have a gun in close proximity to the now dead victim is that it was placed their to provide cover for a shoot that was unjustified.
got proof of that?It wasn't within reach.
I asked for proof and you provided conjecture. If you have proof provide it. If you don't, shut your fucking pie hole, cop hater.
any property? so if I steal a pair of your socks, i should be summarily executed by you? how about a PB & J?
as soon as you provide proof that people who carry guns all the time are just afraid.
the only reasonable answer to have a gun in close proximity to the now dead victim is that it was placed their to provide cover for a shoot that was unjustified.
odd, I can't find 'martial law' in that section anywhere. maybe you should copy and paste it for us.