Responsible Gun Owner Dad Takes Kids Shooting In Park Filled With Other Kids!

Not everyone saw him fire it at the tree. Then he eventually handed over the gun to his little girl, who rode around on her bicycle pointing it at a pair of 2-year-olds playing, witnesses said.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york...-ditmars-park-article-1.1337810#ixzz2TDS6VWlf

Right, again, tasteless certainly, criminal never. The idea that the man played with his kid should be praised even if he did it foolishly. He had a toy, he played. That the cops didn't show up for more than an hour pretty much tells me that when they made the call they had made it clear nobody was in danger.
 
Nice attempt to cover for Rana. I'm not buying it any more than you are pretending not to "buy" what I haven't even sold.

You said you hadn't read the article. You stated you would not be reading the article. You then made a post which made it clear you indeed had read the article.

Your post here is babble that isn't even coherent. I caught you. Trying to pull a Vincent Gigante won't fly sorry.
 
obvious only in hindsight... but you know that.

Bull, hindsight tells me that the cops took more than an hour because the person who placed the call made it clear that nobody was in danger. City cops don't take an hour to show up when people's lives are at stake. Yeah, they'll get there after people are dead, but they show up when the bodies are still warm.

Again, use that brain that god gave you, you know that this story is BS. The idea that this guy is "bad" because some people were so scared that the cops who weren't even there knew nobody was in danger (logically that is because somebody told them that nobody was in danger)... I call Bull Fecal Matter on that.
 
Damo, from all I can tell it was an Airsoft type of gun that shoots plastic pellets. I agree with those that think the dad was an idiot but I don't agree that e should ave been arrested. A fine, maybe ... But not arrested. It was and still is a toy from what I have read.

These type of guns can kill.
 
You said you hadn't read the article. You stated you would not be reading the article. You then made a post which made it clear you indeed had read the article.

Your post here is babble that isn't even coherent. I caught you. Trying to pull a Vincent Gigante won't fly sorry.

I said I read several articles, I have not read the thread. And I haven't. Other than one or two posts as I was hitting the pages to get it off my "new posts" list. You didn't "catch" anything, you simply tried to cover for somebody else's nastiness with an obvious and poorly thought out excuse.
 
Nice attempt to cover for Rana. I'm not buying it any more than you are pretending not to "buy" what I haven't even sold. She knows I'll never react in kind, I'm a safe target for that kind of nastiness.

I find it hilarious that you don't think you are ever nasty to others! I am still laughing.
 
I find it hilarious that you don't think you are ever nasty to others! I am still laughing.

Again something that I didn't say, I just am not nasty because of simple questions (did say that one), and I try to speak about the ideas rather than the person. Tell me how sweet you think you are. I like to hear stories.
 
I said I read several articles, I have not read the thread. And I haven't. Other than one or two posts as I was hitting the pages to get it off my "new posts" list. You didn't "catch" anything, you simply tried to cover for somebody else's nastiness with an obvious and poorly thought out excuse.

My you are so sensitive these days, I won't try to be numerous with you, you are too thinned skinned. I call SF moron all the time in jest, but I guess it hurt your little feelings, so I won't try my brand of humor on you.
 
My you are so sensitive these days, I won't try to be numerous with you, you are too thinned skinned. I call SF moron all the time in jest, but I guess it hurt your little feelings, so I won't try my brand of humor on you.

In what way could your one-word post be taken as humor? Explain it. I like a good laugh.

Over 100 posts in a thread. My first one is three questions, you quote it and say solely "Moron"...

I'll wait for the explanation of how that was funny, if you can do it I will apologize for pointing out your nastiness.
 
Again something that I didn't say, I just am not nasty because of simple questions, and I try to speak about the ideas rather than the person. Tell me how sweet you think you are. I like to hear stories.

You are so full of shit, you are condescending all the time to people and make personal attacks, you just don't see yourself.
 
silenced firearms don't go boom.

Nonsense. Silenced firearms are obviously silenced, every idiot in the park could see there was no suppressor on the Airsoft gun, they know what they look like, they see them on TV.

Let's put it this way, again, they were so scared that they made it so obvious that nobody was in danger that the cops took their sweet time getting there.
 
I respectfully disagree. The only way they have ever "killed" is when the cops mistake them for a real gun and shoot the holder.


No, I went to investigate this type of guns and found a whole page on Google of people dying or being injured by this type of pellet gun.
 
a father and his kid went to a public park where other parents and kids were hanging out... he pulled out a pellet gun which looked like a replica .38 pistol... and he started shooting it... parents were freaked out and grabbed their kids...
Wasn't a pellet gun you retard.
How do you know parents were grabbing their kids?

Lying again are you?
 
well...it WAS a pellet gun and not a toy per se... and, I think they called the cops before they knew one way or the other. They were scared, and gun nuts here are laughing at parents being frightened of a man pulling out a gun and starting shooting in a public park...

No, it was an airsoft gun. That is a toy. It cannot shoot pellets.
 
Back
Top