Republicans are in full damage control mode

Status
Not open for further replies.
They corrected it? You mean they interpreted it differently than Roe? That is called changing the Constitution.
No. It's called changing a decision of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is not the Constitution. Redefinition fallacy.
They changed it from something you didn't like to something you did like.
Repetition (chanting).
Turns out the Supreme Court can change the Constitution. Of course, that is something we already knew.
Attempted proof by redefinition.
 
Whatever. We don't agree shit face.
Because you don't speak English.
You're not a doctor or a priest.
He doesn't have to be. 'Expert' worship.
A woman's right not be enslaved by you is more important to me that your opinion.
No woman has the right to murder. Preventing a murder is not slavery. Redefinition fallacy.
End of story.
Cliche fallacy. Attempted proof by redefinition.
 
Thing is GFM/Into the Night doesn't actually believe that COVID didn't kill anyone.
Because Covid19 does not kill.
He knows it killed people,
It has killed no one. No one has died from covid19.
but he's saying it didn't so that you focus on that outrageous lie and none of the other lies he's saying.
Inversion fallacy. Bulverism fallacy.
Been on enough message boards to recognize the same pattern.
Because YOU cause it.
 
Maybe because Democrats have been committing election fraud for so long in both State and federal elections. It was so bad in 2020 the election faulted.

It is at the moment. Maybe you haven't heard that Democrats installed Joe Biden as Chief puppet?

He did bring charges. Some of the trials have not yet finished.

Democrats have been committing voter fraud for so long? How many fraudulent votes have been found over all this time, including 2020?
 
Ok, so you don't like validating your claims with evidence. I don't blame you.
You need to get our more, son.
So, you just make shit up as you go along with no facts to support it? What a fucking surprise.
No, he's not making anything up. YOU are. Inversion fallacy.
This guy has:
"I see the disinfectant that knocks it out in a minute, one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside or almost a cleaning"
Fake news.
So your opinion is more credible than Johns Hopkins?
Actually, his is. He understands the same evidence that I do. I have already described to you that you cannot use a biased reference.
 
No. They corrected previous unconstitutional SCOTUS rulings. Learn how to read.


No, they didn't interpret the Constitution either.


No, it isn't. I've already told you what happened. The Constitution did not change in any way.


The Constitution remained the same; it did not change (then or now).


The Constitution did not change. It says the same thing post-Dobbs as it did pre-Dobbs.

Not quite right. The Supreme Court has effectively changed the Constitution several times, including the Roe v Wade decision.
At least with the Dobbs decision they finally conformed to the Constitution on that point at least (which they are required to do).

Flash's big problem is that he somehow thinks the Supreme Court IS the Constitution.
 
That’s what happens when you have a party that likes to say “Throwing money at the problem” every time America tries to fund public schools

The federal government has no authority over public schools. The NEA is unconstitutional. Why do you like public schools? Do you think it's 'education' is somehow valuable????!?
 
No, he's not making anything up. YOU are. Inversion fallacy.

Fake news.

Actually, his is. He understands the same evidence that I do. I have already described to you that you cannot use a biased reference.

Fake news? Are you saying Trump never said: "I see the disinfectant that knocks it out in a minute, one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside or almost a cleaning"
Could you really be that delusional?

Did you see the video?

Here, I'll post it again for you.

Watch it and tell me you think it's fake news so I'll know what I'm dealing with.
 
They STARVE PUBLIC SCHOOLS


then complain that public schools are so below performance compared to massively funded higher education



But damn am I sick of the idiot Republican non Logic

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Public schools have far more useless bureaucrats than ever before, all due to more and more money spent on public schools!!!
Meanwhile, classrooms are run by teachers hired for political reasons. They are told to teach that math is racist and other such nonsense. Kids graduate from these institutions functionally illiterate. Yes, that includes college. You are an example.

Illiteracy: Failure to use a period at the end of a sentences. Missing commas. Missing hyphen. Capitalization of common noun.

You have also demonstrated you illiteracy in mathematics, science, and history...even recent history.
 
They do it with everything.

They deliberately create deficits with their tax cuts that they use as an excuse to cut spending, and those cuts are almost always operational which leads to the programs failing, then they point to the failing program (usually fraud and "waste") as an excuse to get rid of the program entirely because they can't otherwise repeal it through conventional legislation due to a lack of support, will, and courage.

The federal government has no authority over public schools.
 
I don't know but I found this:
In other words, you don't know.
Science is not a magazine, journal, website, URL, book, pamphlet, university, degree, license, or any other sanctification. Science is a set of falsifiable theories.
In a new review article -- explicitly targeted to non-specialists as well -- in Frontiers in Public Health, a team of experts from Zunyi Medical University review the epidemiology, disease pathway, symptoms, diagnosis, and current treatment of severe COVID-19. They stress the key role of a potentially lethal overreaction of the immune system in the progression of the disease.

No such thing.
They explain step-by-step what is known about how the virus infects the airways, multiplies inside cells, and in severe cases causes the immune defenses to overshoot with a "cytokine storm." This storm is an over-activation of white blood cells, which release too-great amounts of cytokines -- inflammation-stimulating molecules -- into the blood.

"Similar to what happens after infection with SARS and MERS, data show that patients with severe COVID-19 may have a cytokine storm syndrome. The rapidly increased cytokines attract an excess of immune cells such as lymphocytes and neutrophils, resulting in an infiltration of these cells into lung tissue and thus cause lung injury," explains author Professor Daishun Liu from Zunyi Medical University, China.

The cytokine storm ultimately causes high fever, excessive leakiness of blood vessels, blood clotting inside the body, extremely low blood pressure, lack of oxygen and excess acidity of the blood, and build-up of fluids in the lungs ("pleural effusion").
A cytokine storm????????????!? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Maybe it's due to climate change!
White blood cells are misdirected to attack and inflame even healthy tissue,
No, they aren't.
leading to failure of the lungs, heart, liver, intestines, kidneys, and genitals (Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome, MODS).
Doesn't happen.
This may worsen and shutdown the lungs (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, ARDS) due to the formation of a so-called hyaline membrane, composed of debris of proteins and dead cells, lining the lungs, which makes absorption of oxygen difficult. Most deaths due to COVID-19 are therefore due to respiratory failure.
You are quoting shit that's made up.
Of course, if you do get COVID, you can always try this
Are you STILL trying to push this narrative????????!? Gaslighting.

I've already had covid19. So has Trump. So has Biden. Big hairy deal.
 
When the Constitution is applied differently it may not technically change the Constitution but it clearly changes the way the law applies to our lives every day. Roe did not change the Constitution but it certainly changed the laws that applied to every state.

Changing previous unconstitutional SC rulings is clearly interpreting the Constitution--they had to interpret Roe as unconstitutional before they could correct it just as you are interpreting Roe as unconstitutional in your opinion.

Semantics fallacy. Roe v Wade effectively changed the Constitution. The federal government has NO authority to override State authority here. Changing previous SC rulings is NOT interpreting the Constitution. Redefinition fallacy. The Supreme Court is NOT the Constitution.
 
I think I scare you because I can see through everything you're doing here.

Your bullshit doesn't work on me like it does on other, dumber people.

Assumption of victory fallacy. Gaslighting. He certainly isn't acting scared. You are hallucinating.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top