Good point, Trump has said he would make deals with the Democrats and get things done instead of simply being obstructionist.
And if those deals = jobs to the citizens, the dems will have little choice but band wagon.
Good point, Trump has said he would make deals with the Democrats and get things done instead of simply being obstructionist.
And if those deals = jobs to the citizens, the dems will have little choice but band wagon.

How will Trump create jobs?![]()
And if those deals = jobs to the citizens, the dems will have little choice but band wagon.
I'm all for deals, I thought it was Republicans who were against working with the Democrats in Congress.
By Tax Cuts 4 the Rich[SUP]®[/SUP], of course.
I think there is finally a separation between the rich and the middle class of the Republican party. The middle class are finally realizing they have been used all of these years, but they still reject the liberalism of the Democrats.
I am still struggling to grasp what it is about the Trump supporters that they have in common, what common ideology holds them together if it were not for Trump? Do they return to the Republican party or form their own group?
By Tax Cuts 4 the Rich[SUP]®[/SUP], of course.
Racism
Will the Republican convention nominate Trump on the first round, or will it be a contested convention?
Trump or Contested?
If its contested who will end up with the nomination?
I think there is finally a separation between the rich and the middle class of the Republican party. The middle class are finally realizing they have been used all of these years, but they still reject the liberalism of the Democrats.
I am still struggling to grasp what it is about the Trump supporters that they have in common, what common ideology holds them together if it were not for Trump? Do they return to the Republican party or form their own group?
Only one. All predictions will be wrong. Including this one.Will the Republican convention nominate Trump on the first round, or will it be a contested convention?
Trump or Contested?
If its contested who will end up with the nomination?
You do understand the irony of this picture? It's from the 68 Democratic convention in Chicago.Republican convention Prediction?
![]()
RIOTS!
The problem with that argument is that the people who are running against her are far more disliked than she is. Rural angry white guys don't make up all the electorate. Trump has alienated latinos, blacks, Asians, immigrants (the legal variety who can vote...like my wife) and women. I've seen lice that are more likeable than Ted Crus and Jeb Bush has the personality and likability of an unsalted cracker who's popularity is comparable to Clintons.You seem confident a third party would only take votes from Trump. Hillary is a weak candidate on several fronts, even many democrats don't like her and would like to have someone else to vote for. If Bernie's supporters stay home before voting for Hillary that's going to be significant; if she polls well, today, with blacks and minorities and that doesn't mean they're actually going to cast a ballot on Election Day.
She's in for a fight and she knows it, if even the talking heads don't realize it or admit it.
Excellent summary on redneck populism. It's not about having a better government. It's a "burn the whole fucking thing down if we can't have it our way.".I think he is a proxy middle finger.
There are a very large amount of angry voters that feel very disenfranchised and completely ignored/taken advantage of.
This is why when the media proves Trump is lying, the voters don't care. Or if he says something super controversial (even to normal republican ears) he remains unscathed. This is why when trump gets into the gutter, they love it, but when rubio adopts trumps same strategy, it absolutely tanks his campaign.
You'll notice Rubio adopted the same type of schoolyard tactics, and it just made him look like an even smaller candidate. Why does it work for Trump and not Rubio? It's because he is just a stand-in for frustration. It doesn't matter what he says or what he believes, because they aren't voting for a candidate, they are using him to send a message.
I think republicans are just ready to burn the whole fucking place down, they want to give a giant fuck you to liberals, political correctness, the party establishment, everyone. I don't even think it's about winning. The very fact that they can get someone talking about banning muslims, building a wall, and having them being a major candidate is enough for them. It's sort of like telling all of america that "Hey, we are out there.. we still have large numbers and we fucking hate you.. and we are still capable of maybe even winning the election.."
By nominating trump they make a lot of people out there feel disgusted and possibly even legitimately afraid. I think that's their ultimate goal.
The problem with that argument is that the people who are running against her are far more disliked than she is. Rural angry white guys don't make up all the electorate. Trump has alienated latinos, blacks, Asians, immigrants (the legal variety who can vote...like my wife) and women. I've seen lice that are more likeable than Ted Crus and Jeb Bush has the personality and likability of an unsalted cracker who's popularity is comparable to Clintons.
The data is real clear. Hillary would defeat Trump and she would crush Cruz who would be lucky to win 7 to 10 States. The only true conservative still in the race with a record of actually accomplishing anything in Government isn't getting any traction and Kasich is the only one out of the whole GOP circus wagon that is electable nationally and Kasich is nothing to sing about really. Those are some cold hard facts you ought to consider.
If I was to rate the remaining candidates from first to worst it would be;
#1. Kasich
#2. Sanders
#3. Clinton
#4. Trump
#5. Cruz
and I would stay at home before I would vote for Ted Cruz. A Cruz Presidency would guarantee 4 years of complete government gridlock and an utterly dangerous and irresponsible foreign policy that would get us into another war.
So, no compromise with the opposition results in nothing getting done. What then?
You do understand the irony of this picture? It's from the 68 Democratic convention in Chicago.