Republican AG calls Comey OUT!

[christiefan915]

that beats Clinton's 39x "I can't recall" with the FBI interview

But not reagan's 88+ times about Iran-Contra.

 

[cancel2 2022]

it's not deflection. rana has said many times she'll refuse to watch anything about this stuff. she is willfully ignorant.

She is willfully ignorant on quite a few subjects, as are you on climate change!

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk

 

[christiefan915]

1) Because no charges are filed.
2) Congress is not a judge, or even in the judicial branch.
3) What Comey has might or might not be exculpatory.
4) There are no constitutional issues here.
5) Comey should follow Departmental protocol.
6) In America we are innocent until proven guilty, so no prosecutor should throw shade before a decision to charge or not has been made.
7) The existence of an investigation should never be used to make someone look guilty, its UNAMERICAN.

Well said.

 

[anatta]

But not reagan's 88+ times about Iran-Contra.

lol..touche'

 

[christiefan915]

lol? i love number 7. BUt you have no problem with multiple democratic AG's reopening trump cases and filing against him one month before election yes?

Dont get made when it is done to you

Didn't happen one month before the election.

 

[christiefan915]

Question for Jughead,

What do you think when the United States Attorney General (A.G.), the head of the United States Department of Justice

sees fit to use her 5th amendment rights against self incrimination rather than testify in a congressional hearing....

Truthfully, what does that tell you about this women, counselor ?

do you know if its EVER happened before....?

Even Bill Clinton didn't sink that low....

The bushies sunk that low.....

Ollie North sunk that low.....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

But not reagan's 88+ times about Iran-Contra.

can you link to that transcript Chrispy?.....

 

[christiefan915]

can you link to that transcript Chrispy?.....

You can watch it on the youtube videos. And one article said it was 124 times, not 88.

http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19900223&slug=1057639

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1990-02-23/news/9001160156_1_iran-contra-testimony-recall

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/...085_1_john-poindexter-recall-reagan-testimony

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/02/23/u...on-the-iran-contra-affair.html?pagewanted=all

 

[christiefan915]

 

[christiefan915]

 

[christiefan915]

 

[PostmodernProphet]

I'm sorry but I didn't hear any reference to the 5th amendment in there.....

Your messiah reagan took the fifth 88+ times over Iran-Contra rather than honestly answer questions. Wanna comment on that?

 

[Face Your]

1) Because no charges are filed.
2) Congress is not a judge, or even in the judicial branch.
3) What Comey has might or might not be exculpatory.
4) There are no constitutional issues here.
5) Comey should follow Departmental protocol.
6) In America we are innocent until proven guilty, so no prosecutor should throw shade before a decision to charge or not has been made.
7) The existence of an investigation should never be used to make someone look guilty, its UNAMERICAN.

Comey told Congress under oath that he would report to them if any new evidence was discovered, new evidence was discovered, and he reported to Congress as he was obligated to do.

 

[Face Your]

It seems Comey is guilty of what Hillary detractors are accusing Hillary, not following protocol. Nothing illegal

Except sending classified intel over a non-secure non-DOS server, lying to the FBI, perjury, and destroying evidence.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

To Messeeks,

Let me guess, that was before his announcement could hurt Hillary.

Tried to quote your post, but because of the link, I was unable to until I make 5 posts.

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk