Atty. General takes the 5th

Attorney General Loretta Lynch is declining to comply with an investigation by leading members of Congress about the Obama administration’s secret efforts to send Iran $1.7 billion in cash earlier this year, prompting accusations that Lynch has “pleaded the Fifth” Amendment to avoid incriminating herself over these payments, according to lawmakers and communications exclusively obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.) and Rep. Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.) initially presented Lynch in October with a series of questions about how the cash payment to Iran was approved and delivered.

In an Oct. 24 response, Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik responded on Lynch’s behalf, refusing to answer the questions and informing the lawmakers that they are barred from publicly disclosing any details about the cash payment, which was bound up in a ransom deal aimed at freeing several American hostages from Iran.

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/attorney-general-lynch-pleads-fifth-secret-iran-ransom-payments/

The response from the attorney general’s office is “unacceptable” and provides evidence that Lynch has chosen to “essentially plead the fifth and refuse to respond to inquiries regarding [her] role in providing cash to the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism,” Rubio and Pompeo wrote on Friday in a follow-up letter to Lynch, according to a copy obtained by the Free Beacon.

The inquiry launched by the lawmakers is just one of several concurrent ongoing congressional probes aimed at unearthing a full accounting of the administration’s secret negotiations with Iran.

“It is frankly unacceptable that your department refuses to answer straightforward questions from the people’s elected representatives in Congress about an important national security issue,” the lawmakers wrote. “Your staff failed to address any of our questions, and instead provided a copy of public testimony and a lecture about the sensitivity of information associated with this issue.”

“As the United States’ chief law enforcement officer, it is outrageous that you would essentially plead the fifth and refuse to respond to inquiries,” they stated. “The actions of your department come at time when Iran continues to hold Americans hostage and unjustly sentence them to prison.”

The lawmakers included a copy of their previous 13 questions and are requesting that Lynch provide answers by Nov. 4.

When asked about Lynch’s efforts to avoid answering questions about the cash payment, Pompeo told the Free Beacon that the Obama administration has blocked Congress at every turn as lawmakers attempt to investigate the payments to Iran.

“Who knew that simple questions regarding Attorney General Lynch’s approval of billions of dollars in payments to Iran could be so controversial that she would refuse to answer them?” Pompeo said. “This has become the Obama administration’s coping mechanism for anything related to the Islamic Republic of Iran—hide information, obfuscate details, and deny answers to Congress and the American people.”

“They know this isn’t a sustainable strategy, however, and I trust they will start to take their professional, and moral, obligations seriously,” the lawmaker added.

In the Oct. 24 letter to Rubio and Pompeo, Assistant Attorney General Kadzik warned the lawmakers against disclosing to the public any information about the cash payment.

Details about the deal are unclassified, but are being kept under lock and key in a secure facility on Capitol Hill, the Free Beacon first disclosed. Lawmakers and staffers who have clearance to view the documents are forced to relinquish their cellular devices and are barred from taking any notes about what they see.

“Please note that these documents contain sensitive information that is not appropriate for public release,” Kadzik wrote to the lawmakers. “Disclosure of this information beyond members of the House and Senate and staff who are able to view them could adversely affect the diplomatic relations of the United States, including with key allies, as well as the State Department’s ability to defend [legal] claims against the United States [by Iran] that are still being litigated at the Hague Tribunal.”

“The public release of any portion of these documents, or the information contained therein, is not authorized by the transmittal of these documents or by this communication,” Kadzik wrote.

Congressional sources have told the Free Beacon that this is another part of the effort to hide details about these secret negotiations with Iran from the American public.

One senior congressional source familiar with both the secret documents and the inquiry into them told the Free Beacon that the details of the negotiations are so damning that the administration’s best strategy is to ignore lawmakers’ requests for more information.

“Every Obama administration official and department involved in the Iran Deal appear to be running for cover,” the source said. “Like we feared, the [Iran deal] is turning out to be a disaster and Iran is emboldened in its aggression. Evidently Attorney General Lynch and the Department of Justice have decided ‘refusal to cooperate’ is their best strategy. But this is dangerous and ultimately won’t protect them from anything.”


Are there really any fools left that don't see the corruption in this administration

Yeah it's never a good thing when an AG pleads the 5th. What a pile of corruption all this is.
 
The payments weren't secret, dopey. Obama openly announced the settlement in January.

"The State Department on Sunday also announced the U.S. and Iran had reached a settlement over Iran’s claim to some $400 million, plus interest, frozen by the U.S. since it severed diplomatic ties in 1980. The money had been in a trust used by Iran before the 1979 Islamic Revolution to purchase arms from the U.S."

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...eal-vindicates-diplomacy-over-military-action

that is why the cock gobbler gave no link
 
So tell us why the Atty. General of the United States would see fit take her 5th Amendment rights rather than honestly answer the questions of Congress.....
you don't ever wonder a bit as how she might be incriminated in something....

Your messiah reagan took the fifth 88+ times over Iran-Contra rather than honestly answer questions. Wanna comment on that?
 
The top law enforcement officer of the United States of America is afraid that telling the truth may incriminate her. That's just incredible.

I never put you in the same category as these other conspiracy-theory dopes but now I'm wondering...

Claim: Attorney General Loretta Lynch invoked her Fifth Amendment protection not to incriminate herself over the Obama administration's transfer of money to Iran.

WHAT'S FALSE: Loretta Lynch did not invoke Fifth Amendment protections, was not on trial, and did not decline to testify.

Origin: In October 2016 the conspiracy-mongering site InfoWars was one of several outlets claiming that Attorney General Loretta Lynch "[took]" or "[pled]" the Fifth (Amendment) to avoid testifying with respect to the Obama administration's controversial transfer of money to Iran in settlement of a long-standing Hague Tribunal claim...

Pompeo and Rubio accused Lynch's office of "essentially" pleading the Fifth, but the comment was purely rhetorical. The matter at hand was correspondence between branches of government, not a criminal trial or proceeding involving testimony given under oath, so neither Lynch nor anyone else involved could literally have invoked their Fifth Amendment rights.

http://www.snopes.com/loretta-lynch-pleads-fifth-over-iran-payment/
 
I never put you in the same category as these other conspiracy-theory dopes but now I'm wondering...

Claim: Attorney General Loretta Lynch invoked her Fifth Amendment protection not to incriminate herself over the Obama administration's transfer of money to Iran.

WHAT'S FALSE: Loretta Lynch did not invoke Fifth Amendment protections, was not on trial, and did not decline to testify.

Origin: In October 2016 the conspiracy-mongering site InfoWars was one of several outlets claiming that Attorney General Loretta Lynch "[took]" or "[pled]" the Fifth (Amendment) to avoid testifying with respect to the Obama administration's controversial transfer of money to Iran in settlement of a long-standing Hague Tribunal claim...

Pompeo and Rubio accused Lynch's office of "essentially" pleading the Fifth, but the comment was purely rhetorical. The matter at hand was correspondence between branches of government, not a criminal trial or proceeding involving testimony given under oath, so neither Lynch nor anyone else involved could literally have invoked their Fifth Amendment rights.

http://www.snopes.com/loretta-lynch-pleads-fifth-over-iran-payment/
Wasn't Damo a birther, he always dips a toe into the water. I miss Dung and his insights.
 
I never put you in the same category as these other conspiracy-theory dopes but now I'm wondering...

Claim: Attorney General Loretta Lynch invoked her Fifth Amendment protection not to incriminate herself over the Obama administration's transfer of money to Iran.

WHAT'S FALSE: Loretta Lynch did not invoke Fifth Amendment protections, was not on trial, and did not decline to testify.


what is TRUE.....what Damo posted.....that Loretta Lynch is afraid to tell the truth.....
 
Back
Top