Remember when

Here you are denying documented facts of violence against women

While you deny children were FUCKING RAPED in the Epstein case


YOU OBVIOUSLY DONT CARE ABOUT FEMALES BEING ABUSED BY MEN
You deny the fact that the majority of abusers in the Epstein files were left wingers. Why are you trying to protect them?
 
leftists used to claim that Super Bowl weekend marked a massive increase in domestic violence? The story they peddled was that "cro magnon" men got so invested in the game that if they didn't get the outcome they desired, they took their frustrations out on their poor meek wife or "significant" other.

I haven't heard that myth peddled by the left lately. Is it because it was always a lie? Or did they put on a ribbon and solve it?
Link? Of course not. LOL

Here, let me help the stupid, demented and Trump's poorly educated with facts:
We study the link between family violence and the emotional cues associated with wins and losses by local professional football teams. We hypothesize that the risk of violence is affected by the ‘gain-loss’ utility of game outcomes around a rationally expected reference point. Our empirical analysis uses police reports of violent incidents on Sundays during the professional football season. Controlling for the pre-game point spread and the size of the local viewing audience, we find that upset losses (defeats when the home team was predicted to win by 4 or more points) lead to a 10 percent increase in the rate of at-home violence by men against their wives and girlfriends. In contrast, losses when the game was expected to be close have small and insignificant effects. Upset wins (when the home team was predicted to lose) also have little impact on violence, consistent with asymmetry in the gain-loss utility function. The rise in violence after an upset loss is concentrated in a narrow time window near the end of the game, and is larger for more important games. We find no evidence for reference point updating based on the halftime score
 
^^^
1. Enlarged font.
2. Claimed to be a doctor but lacks basic medical knowledge.
3. Pushed miracle cures during the Pandemic.
^^^^^

1. Complains about enlarged font but use stupid memes with enlarged font. Too funny!
2. Can't explain the difference be tween Human Life and a Human Being and he does not have a high school education but he claims to know more than a doctor. Too funny!.
3. Makes his miracal cure Lie but never provides any proof. Too funny!

Thanks for the laughs Dutch you loser. :rofl2:
 
^^^^^

1. Complains about enlarged font but use stupid memes with enlarged font. Too funny!
2. Can't explain the difference be tween Human Life and a Human Being and he does not have a high school education but he claims to know more than a doctor. Too funny!.
3. Makes his miracal cure Lie but never provides any proof. Too funny!

Thanks for the laughs Dutch you loser. :rofl2:
^^^
1. Proof of an illogical mind.
2. Semi-literate; can't read and understand previously posted information.
3. Pushed HCQ and Ivermectin over the Trump's COVID vaccine during the Pandemic.
4. Plays a doctor online. Who knows what she does IRL?
 
^^^
Can't remember her own posts. Dementia? TBI? Drug-induced brain damage?

Example:
 
I'm leaning towards very dishonest, although it could easily be all of the above.

He/she is a tRumpling, after all.
No doubt he's aware of some of his dishonesty and feels justified to lie since that's what his Orange Jesus does. Yes, he's a staunch Trump supporter.

OTOH, I give allowances to people I feel have mental or cognitive issues. A major question being "If a person truly believes a falsehood, are they intentionally lying or only mentally impaired?

The demographics of JPP is primarily over-60 Euro-American males. Yours truly included. JPP members also self-select by "choosing sides", posting rates, time spent online and time spent on JPP and whether to utilize socks. Over time, these choices define a person's inclinations, educational levels and both emotional and mental stability.

My professional expertise involved 40 years of assessing people for fitness and, for those who aren't fit, either counseling them, processing them for treatment or, if necessary, to be terminated from their position. The experience, when applied to JPP, gives me an edge in identifying people who are "normal" versus those with mental issues, cognitive deterioration*, or just plain stupid.

IMHO, Teflon Don is a combination of cognitive decline and never very smart to begin with. :)


newcleardayimage.jpg

*I cared for my father for 3 years before he eventually died of Alzheimer's which also gave me a unique perspective on many JPP members...mostly MAGAts.
 
Back
Top