Religion on the Left and Right

Take a moment to think about this... The foundation and principles of Liberalism are all rooted and steeped in fundamentals closely related to Christianity. The humanity, caring, giving, helping the needy... all tenants of Christ's teachings. In fact, Liberals often lament that "Jesus was a Liberal." Almost everything about liberalism, comes directly from the Bible, and the teachings of Jesus Christ, it is found in every liberal argument and every liberal initiative. Health Care... we are supposed to be Christ-like and help the sick... it's the fundamental foundation to everything Liberal. But isn't it odd and bizarre, that Atheists and Agnostics most often are Liberals? At the same time, we are constantly told how evil and greedy the Right is, how they don't care about helping those in need, they are always looking to cut funding for some social program or 'do-good' work the liberals have established.... the diametric opposite of Christ-like behavior! Yet..... most devoutly religious people are Republicans. Isn't that strange?

Why is this the case? Why are most of the non-religious Atheist anti-God crowd, also Liberals... while, the religious zealots and fanatics are mostly Conservatives? It would seem, by the party policies and principles, it should be the other way around. It would make sense if Atheists and Agnostics weren't interested in helping the needy, didn't care if school kids starved, or old people had to eat dog food.... and it would seem that Christians and religious faithful, would be more inclined to want to be Christ-like and benevolent to the needy. It's strange and odd that it's the other way around, don't you think?

Oh now, before you all jump in on this, let me clarify, I am not speaking in absolutes by any means, don't take it that way. I know there are a LOT of religiously faithful people who vote Democrat, and certainly, there are many secular republicans... but in general, the religious tend to stick to the right and the non-religious tend to flock to the left... statistics will bear this out. That said, I thought it would make an interesting thread topic, to explore why there is such a strange conundrum in politics.

My take is this... I think Liberals, many times, will replace their spiritual faith in a God, with faith in Government. In short, Government becomes their God and Liberalism becomes their religion. Religious people already have a God and Religion, so they don't see government in this role. Where Liberals believe Government bestows blessings on the needy, Religious conservatives believe this is God's purpose, not Government.

Still... it is strange and odd that Godless Atheists and Agnostics would flock to a political ideology so closely tied to Christian philosophy.
 
Take a moment to think about this... The foundation and principles of Liberalism are all rooted and steeped in fundamentals closely related to Christianity. The humanity, caring, giving, helping the needy... all tenants of Christ's teachings. In fact, Liberals often lament that "Jesus was a Liberal." Almost everything about liberalism, comes directly from the Bible, and the teachings of Jesus Christ, it is found in every liberal argument and every liberal initiative. Health Care... we are supposed to be Christ-like and help the sick... it's the fundamental foundation to everything Liberal. But isn't it odd and bizarre, that Atheists and Agnostics most often are Liberals? At the same time, we are constantly told how evil and greedy the Right is, how they don't care about helping those in need, they are always looking to cut funding for some social program or 'do-good' work the liberals have established.... the diametric opposite of Christ-like behavior! Yet..... most devoutly religious people are Republicans. Isn't that strange?

Why is this the case? Why are most of the non-religious Atheist anti-God crowd, also Liberals... while, the religious zealots and fanatics are mostly Conservatives? It would seem, by the party policies and principles, it should be the other way around. It would make sense if Atheists and Agnostics weren't interested in helping the needy, didn't care if school kids starved, or old people had to eat dog food.... and it would seem that Christians and religious faithful, would be more inclined to want to be Christ-like and benevolent to the needy. It's strange and odd that it's the other way around, don't you think?

Oh now, before you all jump in on this, let me clarify, I am not speaking in absolutes by any means, don't take it that way. I know there are a LOT of religiously faithful people who vote Democrat, and certainly, there are many secular republicans... but in general, the religious tend to stick to the right and the non-religious tend to flock to the left... statistics will bear this out. That said, I thought it would make an interesting thread topic, to explore why there is such a strange conundrum in politics.

My take is this... I think Liberals, many times, will replace their spiritual faith in a God, with faith in Government. In short, Government becomes their God and Liberalism becomes their religion. Religious people already have a God and Religion, so they don't see government in this role. Where Liberals believe Government bestows blessings on the needy, Religious conservatives believe this is God's purpose, not Government.

Still... it is strange and odd that Godless Atheists and Agnostics would flock to a political ideology so closely tied to Christian philosophy.


What is strange is that those (such as yourself) who pose as religious or spiritual, have so little charity of soul towards those less fortunate than yourselves. It is the definition of hypocrisy.

Your failed attempt to define liberals and their thought process is duly noted.
 
What is strange is that those (such as yourself) who pose as religious or spiritual, have so little charity of soul towards those less fortunate than yourselves. It is the definition of hypocrisy.

Your failed attempt to define liberals and their thought process is duly noted.

No, I have PLENTY of charity of soul toward all kinds of people in need, maybe that's why I don't see why Government should assume that role? I don't know of a single person on the right who doesn't think the needy or sick should be helped, they just don't think the GOVERNMENT should do it, and it's something better handled on an individual basis through private charity, religious, and volunteer work.

What have I described inaccurately about Liberalism? Care to explain it to us?
 
Interesting post Dixie....you won't get the libtards to give this any serious response or denials as it stands, they need something to attack.........

Liberal/Democrats not only promote and support all those socialist ideals, but demand ....DEMAND that everyone else do as they say....not freely, but by force of law....the diametric opposite of our countrys absolute main ideal....individual freedom........so what is it ?
Do they actually promote the socialism for the benefit of citizens....not quite.....

They are building a population of needy, dependent, consumers of numerous welfare programs............
.... programs that offer varying degrees of freebies to satisfy every type of person....from the parasite, that lives on the dole by choice, to the untrained or untrainable that have little or no marketable skills to offer an employer, to the unlucky that have just become victims of a stagnant economy, to the old and disabled that just can't perform work anymore but have in the past...., etc.....
All but the parasite actually deserve the help and should have access to these programs....

The divide is that the liberals want to grow the needy, dependent citizen and not help them to independence....Needy that will vote for them and their programs so they can acquire and retain power in Washington and accumulate wealth for themselves...legislate and initiate regulations and laws to govern the masses but that often don't include themselves.....provide themselves with ever growing benefits, such as health and pension and thousands of perks from free cars and gas, subsidized travel, food, etc. down to free haircuts....
The key is growing that dependent citizen and satisfying their need to a sufficient but minimal degree in insure they stay dependent....a plan that is obviously working.




 
What is strange is that those (such as yourself) who pose as religious or spiritual, have so little charity of soul towards those less fortunate than yourselves. It is the definition of hypocrisy.

Your failed attempt to define liberals and their thought process is duly noted.

Does this mean all Christians must believe and embrace your ideals and values rather than what they now have ?
You're the true Christian....?
And why must everyone be a Christian at all....?...Or a socialist ?.....

Normally you ridicule 'other' Christians
 
Take a moment to think about this... The foundation and principles of Liberalism are all rooted and steeped in fundamentals closely related to Christianity. The humanity, caring, giving, helping the needy... all tenants of Christ's teachings. In fact, Liberals often lament that "Jesus was a Liberal." Almost everything about liberalism, comes directly from the Bible, and the teachings of Jesus Christ, it is found in every liberal argument and every liberal initiative. Health Care... we are supposed to be Christ-like and help the sick... it's the fundamental foundation to everything Liberal. But isn't it odd and bizarre, that Atheists and Agnostics most often are Liberals? At the same time, we are constantly told how evil and greedy the Right is, how they don't care about helping those in need, they are always looking to cut funding for some social program or 'do-good' work the liberals have established.... the diametric opposite of Christ-like behavior! Yet..... most devoutly religious people are Republicans. Isn't that strange?

Why is this the case? Why are most of the non-religious Atheist anti-God crowd, also Liberals... while, the religious zealots and fanatics are mostly Conservatives? It would seem, by the party policies and principles, it should be the other way around. It would make sense if Atheists and Agnostics weren't interested in helping the needy, didn't care if school kids starved, or old people had to eat dog food.... and it would seem that Christians and religious faithful, would be more inclined to want to be Christ-like and benevolent to the needy. It's strange and odd that it's the other way around, don't you think?

Oh now, before you all jump in on this, let me clarify, I am not speaking in absolutes by any means, don't take it that way. I know there are a LOT of religiously faithful people who vote Democrat, and certainly, there are many secular republicans... but in general, the religious tend to stick to the right and the non-religious tend to flock to the left... statistics will bear this out. That said, I thought it would make an interesting thread topic, to explore why there is such a strange conundrum in politics.

My take is this... I think Liberals, many times, will replace their spiritual faith in a God, with faith in Government. In short, Government becomes their God and Liberalism becomes their religion. Religious people already have a God and Religion, so they don't see government in this role. Where Liberals believe Government bestows blessings on the needy, Religious conservatives believe this is God's purpose, not Government.

Still... it is strange and odd that Godless Atheists and Agnostics would flock to a political ideology so closely tied to Christian philosophy.

How'd I know, you'd be saying something stupid and telling lies?
 
Sorry Dixie, I can't help you right now.

I don't feel like writing the number of paragraphs needed to debunk YOUR TOTAL BULLSHIT INTERPRETATIONS.

Maybe I'll jump in later if I am desperate for distraction.

Good luck.
 
Sorry Dixie, I can't help you right now.

I don't feel like writing the number of paragraphs needed to debunk YOUR TOTAL BULLSHIT INTERPRETATIONS.

Maybe I'll jump in later if I am desperate for distraction.

Good luck.

What you meant to say is you're too damn stupid to make an intelligent argument because once again you're in over your head. Go back to school and get an education before you go on an adult political forum and crap all over everything with your stupid shit.
 
With the number of Americans living in poverty at its' highest level in years, Dix-lie and his imaginary pals' charitable contributions seem to be falling short of the need, so the government has to step in when the Church Of Rightwing Hypocrisy fails.
 
Hahaha.....I told you from the start Dix....
"you won't get the libtards to give this any serious response or denials as it stands, they need something to attack"


I think thats been proven already.....

 
With the number of Americans living in poverty at its' highest level in years, Dix-lie and his imaginary pals' charitable contributions seem to be falling short of the need, so the government has to step in when the Church Of Rightwing Hypocrisy fails.

But that's what they have been doing more and more of for the past 70 years, and it hasn't helped, by your OWN admission. Maybe if the government would get the hell out of our wallets and let us keep more of our own money, more could be used for charity in the private sector? Don't blame US because your socialist experiment has blown up in your face!
 
But that's what they have been doing more and more of for the past 70 years, and it hasn't helped, by your OWN admission. Maybe if the government would get the hell out of our wallets and let us keep more of our own money, more could be used for charity in the private sector? Don't blame US because your socialist experiment has blown up in your face!

So getting a tax break every time someone make a donations and not having to pay taxes isn't enough for the charities?

And you blame the government?

Maybe charities and donations need to be taxed.

Fine job you alleged big givers are doing.

Because private charity failed, the government had to take up the slack.

Now, boast some more.
 
AND GOVERNMENT FAILED EVEN WORSE!

Yet it keeps trying, because private charities are unequal to the task.


Maybe churches should be taxed and deductions for charitable giving should end. That would fund more programs to help the poor.
 
Interesting post Dixie....you won't get the libtards to give this any serious response or denials as it stands, they need something to attack.........

Liberal/Democrats not only promote and support all those socialist ideals, but demand ....DEMAND that everyone else do as they say....not freely, but by force of law....the diametric opposite of our countrys absolute main ideal....individual freedom........so what is it ?
Do they actually promote the socialism for the benefit of citizens....not quite.....

They are building a population of needy, dependent, consumers of numerous welfare programs............
.... programs that offer varying degrees of freebies to satisfy every type of person....from the parasite, that lives on the dole by choice, to the untrained or untrainable that have little or no marketable skills to offer an employer, to the unlucky that have just become victims of a stagnant economy, to the old and disabled that just can't perform work anymore but have in the past...., etc.....
All but the parasite actually deserve the help and should have access to these programs....

The divide is that the liberals want to grow the needy, dependent citizen and not help them to independence....Needy that will vote for them and their programs so they can acquire and retain power in Washington and accumulate wealth for themselves...legislate and initiate regulations and laws to govern the masses but that often don't include themselves.....provide themselves with ever growing benefits, such as health and pension and thousands of perks from free cars and gas, subsidized travel, food, etc. down to free haircuts....
The key is growing that dependent citizen and satisfying their need to a sufficient but minimal degree in insure they stay dependent....a plan that is obviously working.





How much did your checks from the Eagle add up to this month Bravo?
 
What you meant to say is you're too damn stupid to make an intelligent argument because once again you're in over your head. Go back to school and get an education before you go on an adult political forum and crap all over everything with your stupid shit.

Always with the feces references. Maybe we should call you Fecias instead of Failias.
 
Those generous rightwingers have done such a great job that poverty is higher than its' been in years.



They claim that if only the governmnet would tax them less, they'd be free to eradicate poverty.



They said if they were taxed less they'd create jobs.



The tax cuts have been in effect for over 10 years.



We won't fall for that BS again.
 
But that's what they have been doing more and more of for the past 70 years, and it hasn't helped, by your OWN admission. Maybe if the government would get the hell out of our wallets and let us keep more of our own money, more could be used for charity in the private sector? Don't blame US because your socialist experiment has blown up in your face!

Taxes are lower than they ever were during the last 70 years. Get some reality testing for goodness sake.
 
Didn't the Conservatards say they'd create jobs if taxes were lowered?


Taxes were lowered, and they didn't create jobs.


Now they want lower taxes in exchange for taking care of poverty?
 
Back
Top