Real censorship

Nope, stupid fuck. If you could read, you would know only the government is prohibited from making laws suppressing free speech. An individual cannot violate your First Amendment right.
infringe is a word that works outside of the courtroom dipshit
 
Would the President be in a Constitutionally sound position if he or she pressed to stop someone from selling a dangerous treatment for a disease that doesn't cure the disease but will lead to bad outcomes for the person taking it?
 
I get the distinction you’re making, but in real time science and policy overlapped. What counted as ‘misinformation’ often changed over time. That’s why I think we should be cautious about censorship. If what we know changes, what gets banned one day might look reasonable the next.
No doubt we should be cautious in censorship. But, like the science, the misinformation about those fraudulent treatment claims hasn’t changed, either. Ivermectin, zinc, etc. are still not recognized as proper treatments for COVID.

I was reading an interesting article on this very issue. The lawyer’s take was this:

That the solution to misinformation is not suppression, but MORE information. Good point, however the misinformation, fueled in part by Trump himself, was overwhelming the ability to get the truth out.

I looked into the concept of prior restraint. Speech can be suppressed when there is a compelling national interest. I would submit that a disease that was killing millions and overwhelming our health care system meets that standard.
 
murder is illegal because it infringes on my right to life and liberty. it also infringes on my right to speech. my right to association.


how dumb the left is becoming is insane!

I once had idiots tell me the hiring process can't engage in discrimination - showing they have zero understanding of the meaning of words...or how the hiring process works
 
No doubt we should be cautious in censorship. But, like the science, the misinformation about those fraudulent treatment claims hasn’t changed, either. Ivermectin, zinc, etc. are still not recognized as proper treatments for COVID.

I was reading an interesting article on this very issue. The lawyer’s take was this:

That the solution to misinformation is not suppression, but MORE information. Good point, however the misinformation, fueled in part by Trump himself, was overwhelming the ability to get the truth out.

I looked into the concept of prior restraint. Speech can be suppressed when there is a compelling national interest. I would submit that a disease that was killing millions and overwhelming our health care system meets that standard.
I hear you, but that is the concern. Once you say speech can be suppressed whenever leaders claim there is a compelling national interest, the definition of what counts as compelling can shift. COVID was real and deadly, no argument there, but the precedent does not just go away once the crisis ends. That is why I think allowing more speech is the better long term approach.
 
It’s in the OP. Google told Congress the administration pressed YouTube to remove content that didn’t violate its own rules. That is what started this whole thread.
Ok but I can’t determine if it was demanded, asked for, or w/ threats based on tha limited information.
 
Yep, they were trying to save lives when idiots like you were trying to push horse dewormer and zinc as a treatment for COVID.
so you supported government sponsored censorship?

you really aren't all that free speechy now are you?

good to know you are a hypocrite and the cognitive dissonance runs deep inside of you like it does all marxists

BTW, it was the government that was lying about ivermectin and zinc.
 
so you supported government sponsored censorship?

you really aren't all that free speechy now are you?

good to know you are a hypocrite and the cognitive dissonance runs deep inside of you like it does all marxists

BTW, it was the government that was lying about ivermectin and zinc.
We do not know what the Government did with Google, did they ask Google to fix the problem, (constitutional) bully them (Unconstitutional) or threatened them, (Unconstitutional).

Id have to have more information before I could have an opinion.
 
Why do you care that people want to try ivermectin which was approved for use in humans in the 80s and is on the WHOs list of my important drugs ever developed? Calling it "horse dewormer" is a gross lie and its none of your fucking business what people put into their bodies. Oh thats right you twats want to run everyones lives not just your own which you dont do a very good job of so fuck off asshole
Don't mind domer, like most marxists he is very uninformed
 

Will JPP leftists criticize creepy Joe Biden?

Doubt it
Yeah, right after you take ownership for your parties own dumpster fire of scum:

- Charlie Kirk trashing MLK and claiming black people were better off when they were getting lynched 80 years ago.
- Don Jr. taunting the Pelosis after Paul was attacked, posting a photo of a hammer and dirty underwear with the caption, "I have my Paul Pelosi costume ready!".
- trump declaring he hates Democrats.

It's really funny when you sorry trumptard fucks think you've "got" us :) Go fuck yourself you fucking sorry, evil hypocrite.
 
The only one who had actually had their free speech rights taken from them was charlie kirk. The rest is bullshit
Really? Taking Kimmel off the air wasn't silencing speech you don't like? You're such a fucking idiot!
 
We do not know what the Government did with Google, did they ask Google to fix the problem, (constitutional) bully them (Unconstitutional) or threatened them, (Unconstitutional).

Id have to have more information before I could have an opinion.
they testified that the government pressured them

do you think the government should be pressuring someone who has litigation in front of them?
 
Yeah, right after you take ownership for your parties own dumpster fire of scum:

- Charlie Kirk trashing MLK and claiming black people were better off when they were getting lynched 80 years ago.
- Don Jr. taunting the Pelosis after Paul was attacked, posting a photo of a hammer and dirty underwear with the caption, "I have my Paul Pelosi costume ready!".
- trump declaring he hates Democrats.

It's really funny when you sorry trumptard fucks think you've "got" us :) Go fuck yourself you fucking sorry, evil hypocrite.
comparing government censorship to private citizens speaking shows why you are always the dumbest person in the room.

what is it like having your ass kicked in debate after debate?
 
Nope, stupid fuck. If you could read, you would know only the government is prohibited from making laws suppressing free speech. An individual cannot violate your First Amendment right.
you ran from the debate dipshit?

I'm not done paddling your ignorant ass.

murder. theft. and so on - all illegal because it is infringing on my rights to life. to liberty. to property. murder most certainly infringed on my right to speech you imbecile.
 
I hear you, but that is the concern. Once you say speech can be suppressed whenever leaders claim there is a compelling national interest, the definition of what counts as compelling can shift. COVID was real and deadly, no argument there, but the precedent does not just go away once the crisis ends. That is why I think allowing more speech is the better long term approach.
Perhaps so. Each event will stand alone on its own merits. Until the next pandemic, we may not face such dire circumstances.

What this entire thing proves, along with a long list of other events, is how dangerous social media is. What is the truism?

“Truth travels slowly, but lies travel at the speed of light”.
 
Last edited:
comparing government censorship to private citizens speaking shows why you are always the dumbest person in the room.
The opposite is true, trumptard. Private citizens should not be censored, whether they're on a private speaking show or a private citizen in their own home. You celebrated the silencing of Jimmy Kimmel, while bashing Democrats for preventing you from spewing bullshit about shooting horse tranquilizer. One is free speech, the other is dangerous.
what is it like having your ass kicked in debate after debate?
This is you, "Black Knight".

1758739423703.png

You won't get the reference because you're an idiot.
 
so you supported government sponsored censorship?

you really aren't all that free speechy now are you?

good to know you are a hypocrite and the cognitive dissonance runs deep inside of you like it does all marxists

BTW, it was the government that was lying about ivermectin and zinc.
I understand the need for the rare use of prior restraint. The First Amendment has its limitations, Jethro, and that is one of them.

Nope, stupid fuck, the SCIENTISTS and legitimate MEDICAL COMMUNITY were not lying about those bullshit claims. The government has to rely on established medical professionals, not quacks and quakery.
 
Back
Top