evince
Truthmatters
This is a lie and those who know cawacko know it is. Holy cow.....
prove it
he has never said to me that any of them were wrong
This is a lie and those who know cawacko know it is. Holy cow.....
Thanks lr but that's not necessary. It's Desh, it's what she does. The irony is it's almost Trump
go get the time you said to ME that any of these killings were wrong
Thanks lr but that's not necessary. It's Desh, it's what she does. The irony is it's almost Trump
go get the time you said to ME that any of these killings were wrong
Classic narcissism. Textbook.
Desh, you have the whole "prove it" thing wrong, as usual. YOU said that cawacko was "practically giddy" at the deaths of black children. It's really on you to find a post where he expresses that.
This is a lie and those who know cawacko know it is. Holy cow.....
name one recent incident of a black person being killed that you agree involved racism
None of ou fucks would give one remember
I did some of my own research from a BLM friendly cite.
They preach black genocide and they're closely allied with the Black Liberation Movement [I get the idea 'BLM' is no coincidence] which is an off shoot of the Black Panther movement. So they're basically a far left outfit with some strange conspiracy theories about black genocide and/or 'white colonizing' of blacks in this country. I didn't waste my time trying to figure out how that works lol.
At any rate, 'black genocide' is the show-stopper, because it puts us right back to where we started. If there is a 'black genocide' going on, it's being done by other blacks and not cops. Or at least, cops are a very minor player, in terms of statistics and numbers.
And hell, you could throw abortion in there too, if you want to talk about 'black genocide'. Ever see black abortion statistics? I would be happy to provide them.
It's the same old same old, with BLM. They want to pin the problem on whites. Which means they're part of the problem and not the solution. And more democrats would be calling them out on it, like Bill Clinton did, but this is an election year and they need the black vote, so there's that.
There is no solution for Baltimore. It's my hometown and I loved growing up there in the 60's-etc, but it's a hopeless rat hole now.
After the MLK riots -the city used urban renewal, and there was a real sense of community (black and white) that we are all in this together.
The city went thru a rebirth downtown. Inner Harbor and such as a cure for white flight to the suburbs, and it worked to an extent.
I haven't been in touch since 1999 when I moved to florida, but the desperation of poverty, and the drug violence
has made the city pretty much dysfunctional..
I don't know how to fix it - drug legalization would go along way to reducing crime -
but it looks tome like th residents are as hopeless as ever. It's damn shame.
The city has a long historic background and was really quite lovely back when I was young.
I don't think RAy Lewis knows either what to do. Murders have skyrocketed since Freddie Grey
but they did the same thing before back in the 90's.
If you've ever seen "Homicide -Life on the Streets" that is a very accurate depiction of living in crime infested areas of B-more.
One writer is "telling him". BLM didn't come out and make a statement. So we now have two white women in this thread who don't like that Ray Lewis came out and spoke against murder within the black community.
Look, Ray Lewis can say whatever he wants. I'm not the only person who thinks he's playing fast and loose with the facts. Do the black people contradicting Lewis have the right to do so?
Sure they do. And I did not disagree with you about the irony of Lewis taking his position. But is it white privilege to claim Lewis needed to read Steele's column because you didn't agree with him?
Well, what are the facts lol? The biggest fact has to do with math and statistics. Statistically, even a black gang-banger has a much greater chance at being killed by a fellow black or minority than a cop. The odds of an innocent black dying at the hands of a cop [while being obedient to the cop!] are astronomically small compared to the odds of being killed by another black.
Maybe it would help if BLM changed their name to something else. Because in spite of protestations to the contrary by the group and its sympathizers, it seems apparent to the rest of us that blacks lives matter MOST when they die at the hands of cops.
And the facts support it. Freddy Grey dies at the hands of cops, and Baltimore erupts in flames. Scores of nameless black people die at the hands of other blacks---it's a case dog bites man. That's what Ray Lewis was referring to and he was dead-on.
As I pointed out in another thread, BLM has a serious case of tone-deafness. Furthermore, if democrat leaders like Hillary and Bernie were honest, they would come out and say they don't care for BLM or their tactics.
Bill Clinton came out with it, but he since walked it back.
Lest we forget that most of these killing occur in predominately democratic ran cities. Many that are ran by black politicians as well.
Cfan an has a problem with statistical data, and so it would seem, common sense.
In my mind Ray Lewis is just another in a long line of people who focus on one type of crime only. If we're saying black men in a certain age group commit the most homicides on each other, I agree. And I don't know the answer to preventing anyone from becoming violent, black or white. But that is homicide, not all crime. Table 43 lists 30 different areas of crime and whites own most of them. And when we talk about other criminal behaviour, let's use property crime as an example, nobody ever says we have to try and eliminate that particular "white on white" crime even though whites greatly outnumber blacks in the commission.
Maybe what's obvious in my mind doesn't translate well to the written word. But when people use "black on black" but never "white on white", "Hispanic on Hispanic", "Asian on Asian" etc. to describe crimes, I believe there's an agenda.
Lest we forget that most of these killing occur in predominately democratic ran cities. Many that are ran by black politicians as well.
Cfan an has a problem with statistical data, and so it would seem, common sense.
People always say the bolded, but it's a BS argument.
Poverty in the black community is ultimately founded in discrimination that simply refuses to go away. If you can give me a Dem policy that has actual causality toward the stats we see, you might have some kind of point.
With the caveat that almost no one likes any crime, to me murder is the ultimate crime. And with the number one killer of young black men being murder it's going to get more attention than anything else. Now I don't use the term 'black on black crime'. I see it used occasionally when I read Facebook discussions among black friends (when talking to each other) about what's going on in the community and the need for it to stop.
I've seen black friends get harassed by the police. I know how very real it is so I understand the frustration behind #BLM. I've also seen black folks wanting the cops to come into their communities to clear out the drug dealers and criminals. So it's a mixed bag there. I can also understand why non black people would have the thought of 'the number of black males killed by cops is negligible compared to being killed by others so why so much emphasis on the cops' (and yes the cops are expected to protect and serve and thus are different than private citizens). Clearly there are some within the black community who feel the same way.
I agree with the above but have to ask: how many black on black murders are of young men? I'm trying to dig up an answer to this.