Raising Taxes On The Rich Would Reduce Income Inequality

LIAR!

YES.... you did. You lying sack of shit.

Dear dishonest moron; I didn't claim they don't benefit, I was rebutting the claim that it was a benefit.

Are you retarded? Perhaps I am debating someone who is a special needs case and need to take it down to a lower comprehension level.

Dunce.
 
Taxes may not be income, but they clearly alter net income. Progressive income tax reduces the income inequality of post tax net incomes between the very rich and the not rich. period.

And the outcome of confiscating more from some using tax law changes this "post tax income" statistic...does that make you feel better ?
The taxed got poorer and not taxed remained static.......well, joy to the word.....can we now close this thread ?
 
LMAO; the whiney vagina dunce once again adds NOTHING to any thread debate other than his typical effeminate whining.

Run along shit-for-brains; no one wants to argue with an idiot like you.


But of course, Defective Truth, with his incessant petty attacks "whiny vagina dunce" and his "effeminate whining" and his "shit-for-brains" contributes so very much to the debate...ROTFLMAO!

Defective Dunce...heal thyself.
 
you asked me who made the claim that recipients of LiHEAP did not benefit from the program. I answered your question. YOU made that claim.


And he's been frantically back-pedaling, trying desperately to avoid having to admit he got caught red handed, LYING YET AGAIN.
 
Only if you're a dishonest whiney moron like you; but of course you cannot find substance while you engage in your typical effeminate pathetic whining, you're just too stupid to comprehend much past that.

LMAO; you're truly and ignorant retard at the pinnacle of stupid.


First, you need to calm down before you try and respond.

You respond when you're angry like above, and your inherent stupidity shines through for all to see.
 
But of course, Defective Truth, with his incessant petty attacks "whiny vagina dunce" and his "effeminate whining" and his "shit-for-brains" contributes so very much to the debate...ROTFLMAO!

Defective Dunce...heal thyself.
it does nothing to enhance the argument among all who employ that tactic. But for whatever reason its rampent here.
 
gotcha? I didn't play that game with you at ALL...A few pages back, I posted a comment that said,



your typically pleasant reply to that statement was:



I simply pointed out that the person who made that claim was YOU and I showed you the exact post where you had claimed precisely that.

And you have the gall to suggest anyone else on the planet has shit-for-brains?

If you didn't think you'd like the answer, douchebag, maybe you oughtn't have asked the fucking question in the first place.

asshole. shit-for-brains asshole.


He's so very busy hurling his righteous invective at anyone who DARES question his know-it-all-iness that he can't even remember what he himself said just a few pages ago!

There does appear to be a DEFECTIVE dunce posting in this thread...and he goes by the name Defective Truth.
 
like I said, you're a Faux fed sheeple... you don't know a fucking thing about Marx other than, according to your handlers, it's a dirty word.

Did your one hitch at Gitmo and think you're a fuckin' military stud.... what a fucking joke.

First, you need to calm down before you try and respond.

You respond when you're angry like above, and your inherent stupidity shines through for all to see.


Thats exactly what I was thinking as I read mm's post above....but then Zippy only grades some posts and not others....
 
Dear dishonest moron; I didn't claim they don't benefit, I was rebutting the claim that it was a benefit.

Are you retarded? Perhaps I am debating someone who is a special needs case and need to take it down to a lower comprehension level.

Dunce.

So according to you, someone claimed that those receiving help paying for their heating oil received a benefit.

You then "rebutted" the claim.

Please explain how "rebutting" the claim is in any way DIFFERENT than claiming they don't receive a benefit.
 
so... what I claimed was a benefit, you are saying that is NOT a benefit.... but, if you are also saying that you didn't say they didn't benefit from the program, please explain how they DO - according to you - benefit?

And when you said, THEY DO NOT BENEFIT, that somehow meant that they DO benefit?

You'll need to explain that pretzel logic.


Accept facts...you will NEVER get a lying asswipe like Defective Truth to admit he's wrong.

His petty hatred runs far too deep to ever let him admit a Liberal got the best of him in honest debate.
 
Thats exactly what I was thinking as I read mm's post above....but then Zippy only grades some posts and not others....

Nah... I rarely get angry on here and never at lightweights like you bravo....I just sometimes talk like a seagoing sailor, not some REMF sandcrab like you. ;)
 
Nah... I rarely get angry on here and never at lightweights like you bravo....I just sometimes talk like a seagoing sailor, not some REMF sandcrab like you. ;)

Still....its odd that you only talk like a seagoing sailor when you're losing a debate....imagine that...

I'm almost glad Zippy has effectively brought this thread to a close with his inane remarks and selective cheer-leading.....


and don't forget the old adage......"...to each according to his work.", that way income inequality won't get you all riled up the way it has....hahaha...Over and out.
 
Still....its odd that you only talk like a seagoing sailor when you're losing a debate....imagine that...

I'm almost glad Zippy has effectively brought this thread to a close with his inane remarks and selective cheer-leading.....


and don't forget the old adage......"...to each according to his work.", that way income inequality won't get you all riled up the way it has....hahaha...Over and out.
Real sailors know you never say over and out... It's always one OR the other.
 
Back
Top