LMAO; you're beyond stupid...which is why you are a dimwitted Liberal stuck on that special kind of permanent stupid.
Raising Taxes On The Rich Would Reduce Income Inequality
- Thread starter Yoda
- Start date
LMAO; you're beyond stupid...which is why you are a dimwitted Liberal stuck on that special kind of permanent stupid.
LMAO; this is a small brain on economic dunce...don't be an economic dunce.
You Liberals represent a level of stupid that cannot be matched. It borders on mentally retarded.
maineman
Banned
ok...let me get this straight... taxes have nothing to do with a thread whose title is "raising taxes on the rich would reduce income inequality"
whatever you say....
are you drunk, maybe?
Only if you're a dishonest whiney moron like you; but of course you cannot find substance while you engage in your typical effeminate pathetic whining, you're just too stupid to comprehend much past that.
LMAO; you're truly and ignorant retard at the pinnacle of stupid.
How ironic coming from a dishonest dunce who on this thread a few posts back played the "gotchya" game with me. You really are a repugnant desperate and dishonest hypocrite aren't you?
LMAO
Please show how the wealthy cause income inequality shit-for-brains; we need more comedy in the thread. Zappas and Mainetard have about run out of painfully stupid things to say.
income inequality is not just between those at the top and those at the bottom....
2 CEO's, each making millions pre year have income inequality.......its a stupid premise from the start....
there is income inequality between just about every person with a job....its a pointless topic....
Economic egalitarianism- a state of economic affairs in which equality of outcome has been achieved for all the participants of a society.
A rose by any other name, etc.....
2 CEO's, each making millions pre year have income inequality.......its a stupid premise from the start....
there is income inequality between just about every person with a job....its a pointless topic....
Economic egalitarianism- a state of economic affairs in which equality of outcome has been achieved for all the participants of a society.
A rose by any other name, etc.....
I'm not you dishonest retard; it has been answered a thousand times. But that won't stop you from removing any doubt you’re an idiot will it?
I'm still waiting for an HONEST answer from you how the wealthy are the cause of income inequality and how stealing MORE of their wealth will resolve it.
I'm still waiting for an HONEST answer that identifies WHY income inequality is a problem; but waiting for something honest from you is like expecting something intelligent from Zappas, Dante's or Evince.
Nope, you got it wrong again....
taxes have nothing to do with income inequality....thats the debate now that it has progressed since the op....try to keep up....
are you a little slow, maybe ?
because taxes are not income, they are out go and its income differential you seek to alter.
There you go again trying to play that "gotchya" game you whined about to NOVA; beyond pathetic if you ask me.
I'd like to know what the LiHEAP program has to do with the thread premise shit-for-brains; let me help you with that...NOTHING.
You're an epic example why one can never argue with an idiot; because idiots like you just attempt to drag everyone down to their level, then beat them with experience.
You're epic dishonesty is only exceeded by your repugnant ignorance.
maineman
Banned
gotcha? I didn't play that game with you at ALL...A few pages back, I posted a comment that said,
your typically pleasant reply to that statement was:
I simply pointed out that the person who made that claim was YOU and I showed you the exact post where you had claimed precisely that.
And you have the gall to suggest anyone else on the planet has shit-for-brains?
If you didn't think you'd like the answer, douchebag, maybe you oughtn't have asked the fucking question in the first place.
asshole. shit-for-brains asshole.
BINGO; but do not expect dishonest leftist assholes to comprehend anything you are trying to tell them. They are too embedded in a historically failed ideology and stuck permanently on stupid.
maineman
Banned
when have I ever said that I wanted to alter pre-tax income differential?
Taxes may not be income, but they clearly alter net income. Progressive income tax reduces the income inequality of post tax net incomes between the very rich and the not rich. period.
To suggest that the conversation is not about the effects of raising taxes on that income inequality should probably have been addressed to the author of the OP who named the fucking thread in the fucking first fucking place.
Dear repugnant asshole; I didn't claim they didn't benefit from the program, I pointed out that your definition of what was a benefit wasn't a benefit at all.
But because you are too stupid, ignorant and dishonest to comprehend that, you run with it with your typical moronic dishonesty and think you caught me in a lie.
Let's face it; you're too much of an ignoramus to have any kind of honest dialogue with and too retarded to comprehend the written word.
You're an idiot of epic proportions which why so many here point at you and say "look, an idiot" while laughing.
Dismissed Comrade.
maineman
Banned
so... what I claimed was a benefit, you are saying that is NOT a benefit.... but, if you are also saying that you didn't say they didn't benefit from the program, please explain how they DO - according to you - benefit?
And when you said, THEY DO NOT BENEFIT, that somehow meant that they DO benefit?
You'll need to explain that pretzel logic.
It is painfully obvious you have no clue what income inequality is to make such remarkably stupid claims.
But what is also apparent is that you are either to stupid, or dishonest to answer the basic question; how does income inequality harm anyone? It is a stupid issue for ignorant dunces who parrot the class envy Marxist rhetoric of this buffoon of a President and his DNC backers.
Too suggest that by allowing the Government to forcefully take more of the income of the wealthy based on a false premise of inequality is probably the most retarded argument anyone can make.
But I am sure being the idiot you are, you will find a way to outdo yourself.
Why do you think I want to engage in a never ending circle of stupidity with an idiot like you?
I clearly pointed out WHY it is not a benefit to be a ward of the State; the fact that you are too stupid to comprehend that or too dishonest to acknowledge that is not my problem.
Now run along like a good little idiot and stop boring me with your incredible stupidity.