No, she did not. You just don't understand what she professed.
So, what did she profess that we are misunderstanding, thanks.
No, she did not. You just don't understand what she professed.
Oh but there is nothing as tragic as to see a beautiful theory slain by an ugly fact.both sides ignore science when it goes against their ideology. Funny how so many on this board pretend it is just 'conservatives' that do so.
I would say that a conservative is a person who has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, whether that be socially or economically.I don't think there is a 'true conservatism' in the sense that everyone has a different idea of what that entails. Ayn, like many others on both sides, has some good ideas and some that are a bit out there. Keep in mind I say this based on my perception of where she is. Obviously the further to the left a persons ideology lies, the more 'insane/crazy' Ayn will 'appear'.
A true conservative to me with regards to politics is one that focuses on fiscal responsibility and limited government (again, this is a highly subjective phrase).
I think Rand was pretty clear that she identified herself as being an objectivist.Rand was not a conservative and certainly not a Republican. She's not even really a libertarian, although that is the party that most closely embodies her views.
Some of the irrational positions the left have on vaccines come to mind. I think your point is valid. When someone has to choose between changing a cherished view based upon the discovery of new facts or data it is the new facts and data, more often than not, that goes out the window.why don't you also link us up to your research showing conservatives/Reps 'denied' the effects of smoking and used scare tactics on flouridated water.
No, she was not.
Some of the irrational positions the left have on vaccines come to mind. I think your point is valid. When someone has to choose between changing a cherished view based upon the discovery of new facts or data it is the new facts and data, more often than not, that goes out the window.
I think that currently there is more of an anti-intellectual/anti-science constituency in the Republican party and that explains why the majority of credentialed scientist currently vote Democratic but in the broader sense SF is right about both being anti-science just simply from the stand point that the vast majority of Americans are illiterate in science. Only around 5% of Americans are literate in science beyond the High School level.Evolution? Stem Cells? When's the last time a Democrat candidate for POTUS said that vaccines cause Dixieitis (aka "mental retardation")? And you are wrong on climate change too. The denial on the effects of smoking were maintained well after the science was clear? The scares concerning fluoridated water?
The left occassionally latches on to some strain of nonsense but it is usually short lived.
I concur, at least, thats been my experience.precisely... the more a person has vocalized and championed a view... the harder it is for them to change.
Yes, to the part in bold. She opposed the entitlement mentality. I don't recall her berating the poor on assistance programs. Most of her venom was directed at the crony capitalists and poverty pimps demanding that they had some right to government support.
The funny thing is, is she only needed help because of her pig headed/conservative like denial of science concerning the effects of smoking.
But in the end she wound up on public type assistance. Socialist stuff.
So she was a mess, why the hero worship by many on the right?
The left's inclination to destroy people through character assassination is truly epic....
The Truth:
"Ayn Rand died on March 6, 1982, in her New York City apartment, of heart failure. She was buried in Kensico Cemetery in Valhalla, N.Y., next to her husband Frank O’Connor (who died in 1979)."
As to her being alone and miserable, Leonard Peikoff described her final hours in a talk at Boston's Ford Hall Forum.
"Ayn Rand did NOT die “alone and bitter.” I know, I was among her best friends at the end of her life. She was working on a screenplay for Atlas Shrugged, until she got very ill (heart disease) and died 6 weeks later. She planned to produce the movie herself and move to Hollywood to get it done (she lived at 120 E. 34th St. in NYC). She held the same philosophy up to the end, and had the same love of life as the fictional heroes she created."
Comment by Harry Binswanger — November 7, 2011 @ 7:56 pm
Of course shes not like the kind of women the left and Democrats admire....women like Margret Sanger who said,
On blacks, immigrants and indigents:
"...human weeds,' 'reckless breeders,' 'spawning... human beings who never should have been born." .... Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, referring to immigrants and poor people.
------------------------------
“…Now, I have to tell you that it was a great privilege when I was told that I would receive this award. I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision…."
Quote from Hillary Clinton.
No .... Rand was not your kind of 'hero'....Sanger is.....