question for the left

Darth Omar said:
When it’s plausible the president is the victim of a conspiracy, he can and should ‘stick his nose in it’ to protect the office of the president.
Click to expand...

lol

Spare us the conspiracy bullshit. Several of his inner circle have already pleaded guilty or are under indictment. He and his people are the SUBJECTS of an ongoing investigation. His efforts have been only to protect himself. He doesn't give a flying shit about the office itself. He brings shame upon it.
 
domer76 said:
lol

Spare us the conspiracy bullshit. Several of his inner circle have already pleaded guilty or are under indictment. He and his people are the SUBJECTS of an ongoing investigation. His efforts have been only to protect himself. He doesn't give a flying shit about the office itself. He brings shame upon it.
Click to expand...

It’s plausible the president is a victim of a conspiracy—that’s not a theory but a fact.

Trump didn’t give up his constitutional rights when he was sworn in.
 
domer76 said:
The cost of thier conference table?

REALLY?

Jesus......
Click to expand...

theres also the fact that the FBI agents interviewing Flynn thought he was telling the truth as well as the conflicting testimonies given by mccabe comey etc. ut if i led with that you wouldnt have replied :P
 
Darth Omar said:
It’s plausible the president is a victim of a conspiracy—that’s not a theory but a fact.

Trump didn’t give up his constitutional rights when he was sworn in.
Click to expand...

A "plausible fact"? Priceless!

He has no Constitutional right the the details of an investigation of himself.
 
katzgar said:
Putin needs to send you in to the shop for reprogramming. The idea that the price of a table is a national security issue is one of the dumbest post on here ever.
Click to expand...

Dude, the table price was redacted because it was considered too classified for people to see it.

It was only unredacted because of Nunes. And the Swamp wonders why people don’t trust them.
 
tsuke said:
According to the left the executive shouldnt be involved in the FBI/DOJ. They also resist any attempts by the legislative to get documents from the FBI.

Which branch should have oversight over the intelligence agencies then?
Click to expand...

The Executive should be involved in the FBI/DOJ, but if the FBI/DOJ is investigating the Executive or any issue close to him, the Executive should not have access to the specifics of that investigation until its over. The Executive should be involved in a broad oversight level, not an individual case level.
 
Jarod said:
The Executive should be involved in the FBI/DOJ, but if the FBI/DOJ is investigating the Executive or any issue close to him, the Executive should not have access to the specifics of that investigation until its over. The Executive should be involved in a broad oversight level, not an individual case level.
Click to expand...

Legislative should have no oversight then?
 
Sessions, the AG ,has power over Mueller and the investigations. He recused himself, as he should have, and gave the power to Rosenstein. The president has no power to run the investigation. All he can do is fire those in charge or find someone who will. That is what Nixon did. How did that work out?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top