Putin Bounty on GIs- Putin Hacks US Secrets...Trump Does Nothing
- Thread starter Hoosier Daddy
- Start date
count me the fuck out of that deceitful bunch
Yep.....Its Chinese policy. By extension that means it has become deep state AND Democrat party policy.
You mean the same people who told us all about the WMD in Iraq? Lefties are very odd. They seem to change their mind an awful lot about if they are for or against certain govt agencies. Its almost like their support changes based upon if the agency is pushing a left or right narrative at the time. When pushing left= all good. When pushing right= they are evil mother fuckers.
I'm an American. I believe the Intelligence Community (rightly or wrongly). If they claim the latest cyber attack is from Russia. I believe them.
You seem the one that likes to 'Pick & Choose' what you want to believe.
The overwhelming majority of left wingers sure didnt believe them when it came to Iraqi WMD. So,...are you saying you did believe and support them back then?
it's ALWAYS da Russians and it's ALWAYS Cozy Bear
I'm pretty sure the DNC was never even hacked -it was an inside job (thumb drive download)
But da Russians always give a big thrill to the politicians and IC
you swallow IC lies without even gaggingYou're a Russian Stooge. You were never counted in.
When Bush wanted to go to War with Iraq, the Democrats backed him.
"Hillary Clinton’s Support for the Iraq War Was No Fluke"
https://fpif.org/hillary-clintons-support-iraq-war-no-fluke/
You have one Commander in Chief. Most Americans will follow.
Later ... people may change their minds.
Well, they have a little expertise and a few dollars to accomplish what they set out to do. I'm pretty sure the Capitalists here in America want to keep their Country safe. So yeah, i believe what they have to say.Course, I guess I could believe some Russian Stooge on the Internet. (?)
Controlled Opposition
Note my apathy
Americans are gullible.
no point in believing me.
Course, I guess I could believe some Russian Stooge on the Internet. (?)
The IC has repeatedly lied -From Iraq to Syria ( arming "rebels" ) to the entire Russian Hoax .. suit yourself
Yeah. You seem to favor Russia in all your postings.
I had a discussion with you on Crimea once. Once I agreed with you that Crimea was 'really' Russian, you disappeared as though you had accomplished a task of 'converting' an American and wanted to cash in on you Kopeck allowance.
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
i created a post just for silly clowns like you where I did it for you. you click on the link and then you read the summary of what I posted in the first place, you goon. are you trying to be stupid?
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
you are lying. the Resolution Clinton and a minority of democrats voted for said nothing about an invasion. It was an ultimatum to Saddam THAT HE ALLOW THE INSPECTORS BACK IN AS HE AGREED IN THE KUWAIT CEASE FIRE WITH THE UN, NOT THIS COUNTRY. we had no treaty with Saddam. only the UN had a treaty with them. the Resolution said if Saddam did not allow UN inspectors back in with complete access, then the US would be authorized to use force to make him comply. Nothing about an invasion. A month after the Resolution passed, Saddam allowed the inspectors back in, and AFTER THAT, bush invaded on lies about wmds and ties to al qaeda, nothing at all to do with the Resolution, which was moot after Saddam allowed the inspectors back in.
The resolution "supported" and "encouraged" diplomatic efforts by President George W. Bush to "strictly enforce through the U.N. Security Council all relevant Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq" and "obtain prompt and decisive action by the Security Council to ensure that Iraq abandons its strategy of delay, evasion, and noncompliance and promptly and strictly complies with all relevant Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq."
The resolution authorized President Bush to use the Armed Forces of the United States "as he determines to be necessary and appropriate" in order to "defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq."
215 (96.4%) of 223 Republican Representatives voted for the resolution.
82 (39.2%) of 209 Democratic Representatives voted for the resolution.
29 (58%) of 50 Democratic senators voted for the resolution.
Using math, there were a total of 259 democratic votes on the Resolution in the Senate and House combined.
Of that total 111 democrats voted for, 148 against. 148 is 37 more than 111. you are a liar.
And the resolution did not call for an invasion, just force IF saddam did not allow the inspectors back in. But he did.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autho...ilitary_Force_Against_Iraq_Resolution_of_2002
no worries
Verified User
The propaganda manipulation is strong in this one.China wants one narrative pushed and one only.
Russia=BAD
China=GOOD
Now why is that exactly? Could it possibly be that an allied U.S/Russia could make things very bad for China if things ever got hairy?
Russia is far from perfect,....not like we havent allied with them before though to defeat a common enemy. And we allied with a MUCH WORSE Russia back then,... than the one that exists today.
A lot of our problems in the last 20 years all trace back to the same place and it is not Russia. Those problems only get worse by the day. WAKE UP!
'Now why is that exactly? Could it possibly be that an allied U.S/Russia could make things very bad for China if things ever got hairy"?
Little late, China and Russia already have an alliance both against the west "If things ever get hairy".
OCTOBER 11, 2020
asiatimes.com/2020/10/russia-and-china-cementing...
In a rare display of warm personal relations, President Xi Jinping said in an interview with Russian media ahead of his trip to Russia in June last year, “I have had closer interactions with President Putin than with any other foreign colleague. He is my best and bosom friend. I cherish dearly our deep friendship.”
At a ceremony in the Kremlin during the visit, marking the 70th anniversary of Russian-Chinese diplomatic ties, Xi told his counterpart Vladimir Putin that China was “ready to go hand in hand with you.”
The strategic import of Russia’s transfer of advanced missile early-warning knowhow to China needs to be properly understood. It implies a virtual military alliance.
The transfer of the Missile Attack Warning System (known by its Russian initials SPRN) coincided with a massive Russian military exercise, dubbed Center-2019 (Tsentr-2019), held from September 16 to 21 last year in western Russia.
no worries
Verified User
Your dear leader seems, to like Chinese policy, on elections, then by extension so do teabaggers.
U.S. President Donald Trump praised Chinese President Xi Jinping Saturday after the ruling Communist party announced it was eliminating the two-term limit for the presidency, paving the way for Xi to serve indefinitely.
“He’s now president for life, president for life. And he’s great,” Trump said, according to audio of excerpts of Trump’s remarks at a closed-door fundraiser in Florida.
“And look, he was able to do that. I think it’s great. Maybe we’ll have to give that a shot someday,” Trump said to cheers and applause from supporters.
Yep, Dotard and his cult are trying to do that since the election.
no worries
Verified User
You mean the same people who told us all about the WMD in Iraq? Lefties are very odd. They seem to change their mind an awful lot about if they are for or against certain govt agencies. Its almost like their support changes based upon if the agency is pushing a left or right narrative at the time. When pushing left= all good. When pushing right= they are evil mother fuckers.
You mean the last idiotic teabagger regime that was installed in the white house?
We looked at grainy pictures of buildings that Rumsfeld and Powell TOLD us were storage/facilities for WMD.
The agency provided the pictures, the Bush regime provided the narrative. (Lies)
--->"The resolution authorized President Bush to use the Armed Forces of the United States "as he determines to be necessary and appropriate" in order to "defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq."
215 (96.4%) of 223 Republican Representatives voted for the resolution.
82 (39.2%) of 209 Democratic Representatives voted for the resolution.
"
Yes. This is what I was referring to. It was from memory. Sorry I wasn't more clear on this.
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
i thought i was replying to the typical trump voter...sorry for the insults.