Putin blatantly violates Minsk accord

Status
Not open for further replies.
2) Ukraine's law on this is insane.
It basically says no region can leave Ukraine without everyone in Ukraine agreeing to it.
That is nuts.

...

Just as I would if ANY region voted overwhelmingly to leave it's country...including ANY US state (assuming they took their share of the national debt on a per capita basis with them).
.

You should check out US history from about 1860 to 1865. I think the issue was settled.
 
IMO, this is what Putin wants; to recognize the entire disputed area as a separate state. He'll move his army into Eastern Ukraine, South Russia, Putinastan or whatever they call it and then it will be Putin's Army standing off the world saying "Come and take it". That's his end game.

He's the winner and the West will declare "Democracy in action" after Putin agrees that Ukraine is sovereign and agree on where the lines will be drawn.

Small victory for Vlad. Ruble value shoots up after peace declared.

I have always felt that incursions into contested border areas was more likely rather than a full blown invasion with the capture of Kiev as the goal. But, I could be wrong.
 
I have always felt that incursions into contested border areas was more likely rather than a full blown invasion with the capture of Kiev as the goal. But, I could be wrong.

Especially under these circumstances. The old "Possession is 9/10s of the law" comes into play. Putin can hold what he has, declare peace, extract as many concessions as possible including even a "Free election" in the contested area about separation or unification....then, of course, use the Internet to turn the election. LOL

Results count; Ukraine is smaller but free. Russia agrees to an independent state under them.
 
You should check out US history from about 1860 to 1865. I think the issue was settled.

The law wasn't settled until after the war when it was clarified that secession was illegal. I disagree, but that's the way they ruled after the Civil War.

https://www.texastribune.org/2021/01/29/texas-secession/
Yet even before Texas formally rejoined the nation, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that secession was not legal, and thus, even during the rebellion, Texas continued to be a state. In the 1869 case Texas v. White, the court held that individual states could not unilaterally secede from the Union and that the acts of the insurgent Texas Legislature — even if ratified by a majority of Texans — were “absolutely null.”
 
In invading Iraq the US violated its UN Charter pledges. The US has also invaded Syria and Afghanistan. The US also supports the illegal invasion of Palestine. Suppose we cut out the hypocrisy .
 
Here's a joint American/Israeli fascist venture in Occupied Syria- a violation of international law;

th


Suppose we cut out the hypocrisy.
 
Here's a US airbase on the Chagos Islands- the building of which involved the ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Chagossian population and the shooting of their animals and pets- a gross violation of international law.

th


Suppose we cut out the hypocrisy.
 
In invading Iraq the US violated its UN Charter pledges. The US has also invaded Syria and Afghanistan. The US also supports the illegal invasion of Palestine. Suppose we cut out the hypocrisy .

Ask the indians about America honoring treaties. However, this situation is about Russia. Russia is a gas station with nuclear weapons. They can be crippled economically by Europe getting fuel elsewhere.
 
Ask the indians about America honoring treaties. However, this situation is about Russia. Russia is a gas station with nuclear weapons. They can be crippled economically by Europe getting fuel elsewhere.

The infidelities of frontier Americans- the dross of Europe- predate international law.
The situation, however, is not about Russia- it's about NATO. The Russians asked nicely for NATO to cross Ukraine off its list of countries to subvert and NATO refused.
Also, China will be only too happy to absorb all the gas that Russia intended for Europe.
 
Here's a US airbase on the Chagos Islands- the building of which involved the ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Chagossian population and the shooting of their animals and pets- a gross violation of international law.

th


Suppose we cut out the hypocrisy.
Too bad the truth is there was no genocide, it was the Brits who did it and the island was returned. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_of_the_Chagossians#Forced_deportation

If you had a few drinks, would you be the life of the party, Ms. Moon?....or aren't women allowed to dance in your neighborhood?

giphy.gif
 
In invading Iraq the US violated its UN Charter pledges. The US has also invaded Syria and Afghanistan. The US also supports the illegal invasion of Palestine. Suppose we cut out the hypocrisy .

Once again Ms. Moon supports Putin. LOL
 
Too bad the truth is there was no genocide, it was the Brits who did it and the island was returned.

Would you have preferred a genocide, you racist prick.
It's the US which occupies the ethnically-cleansed islands and no, the islands have not been returned. You are way dummer than you think

If you had a few drinks, would you be the life of the party, Ms. Moon?....or aren't women allowed to dance in your neighborhood?

In my neighborhood a racist prick like you might be found in a dumpster with his nuts in his mouth. Just as well you've got decent folk like me to protect you.


Suppose we cut out the hypocrisy.
 
Too bad the truth is there was no genocide, it was the Brits who did it and the island was returned.

Would you have preferred a genocide, you racist prick.
It's the US which occupies the ethnically-cleansed islands and no, the islands have not been returned. You are way dummer than you think

In my neighborhood a racist prick like you might be found in a dumpster with his nuts in his mouth. Just as well you've got decent folk like me to protect you.

Suppose we cut out the hypocrisy.
No, Ms. Moon. I'm a civilized American. The Brits invented concentration camps so it wouldn't surprise me if they've committed tribal genocide against those they control.

Sweetie; the natives were long gone before the Americans arrived. It was a British operation.

You're too much of a hater to protect anyone who disagrees with you.
 
No, Ms. Moon. I'm a civilized American. The Brits invented concentration camps so it wouldn't surprise me if they've committed tribal genocide against those they control.

Sweetie; the natives were long gone before the Americans arrived. It was a British operation.


As I said, you racist prick, it's the US which occupies the ethnically-cleansed islands. You might think that that's absolution from blame and responsibility but then you're a racist prick with no sense of natural justice, let alone a grasp of international law relating to complicity with crimes against humanity.

Suppose we cut out the hypocrisy. Compared to the US the Russians are haloed putti offering humanitarian cornucopia.
 
As I said, you racist prick, it's the US which occupies the ethnically-cleansed islands. You might think that that's absolution from blame and responsibility but then you're a racist prick with no sense of natural justice, let alone a grasp of international law relating to complicity with crimes against humanity.

Suppose we cut out the hypocrisy. Compared to the US the Russians are haloed putti offering humanitarian cornucopia.

Sweetie; you're making a mountain out of Muhammad's falafel. It's a British island, the Brits removed the denizens and lease it to the Americans. If you want to whine and bitch about them, bitch to the fucking Brits.

...or do your drinking dance:

arabian-dance-dance.gif
 
The infidelities of frontier Americans- the dross of Europe- predate international law.
The situation, however, is not about Russia- it's about NATO. The Russians asked nicely for NATO to cross Ukraine off its list of countries to subvert and NATO refused.
Also, China will be only too happy to absorb all the gas that Russia intended for Europe.

It is about Russia trying to destroy NATO. Trump talked about America withdrawing from it. NATO was designed as a defense against Russian expansion.Putin had his man in the Whitehouse. Trump was after a new world order and Putin would have been a star.
If that is true, why are they building a pipeline through Europe?
 
The Nord Stream 2 pipeline was to supplement the existing pipeline in order to provide more gas to Europe. It is a commercial project between adult states. No Slavic ninjas were expected to emerge from it in Germany and no Neo-Nazi extremists were expected to transit into Russia. It is a commercial project between adult states.

The US doesn't want Russia integrated into Europe. It wants the co-operation ended. Ukraine is being used- by NATO- as a ploy to divide Europe from Russia. NATO agreed not to expand eastwards. It lied.
That's the Russian viewpoint- and I agree with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top