Yakuda
Verified User
Good questionIf it isn't alive and growing why is there a need to terminate it?
Good questionIf it isn't alive and growing why is there a need to terminate it?
They are lucky he didn't go with terminating their lives.All that.... and
it's an unborn baby... Think about your own children....

Women don't terminate their eggs.Good question
Sure but you are making the 'trans' person argument which is words have no meaning other than how any individual wants to identify them.Well, unless a pregnant woman is talking about it... then it's a baby just fine... Unless you are one of those d*cks that would try to mansplain and "correct" a pregnant woman for talking about her baby.
Baby can be an infant, or a fetus. It's not a scientific term.
^^^A child is conceived.
Why do you make shit up? I said its not a baby.So in your mind it is OK to terminate a life and a soul ?
ok.Democrats constantly change the meaning of words.
It can be anything you choose, but its not the common definition and in a political argument it rings desperate and false. The argument can be made without misusing words to create an emotional reaction. That is all I am saying.Well, unless a pregnant woman is talking about it... then it's a baby just fine... Unless you are one of those d*cks that would try to mansplain and "correct" a pregnant woman for talking about her baby.
Baby can be an infant, or a fetus. It's not a scientific term.
The issue, for me, is not what it is, but who has agency over their own body.What did I make up? Stop being an idiot. No one should be allowed to terminate a human life especially not an innocent one. You people play with the definitions to justify your blood lust. When does life begin? It's not a person. It's my body. Literally nothing but bullshit
It depends on whether the baby is wanted or unwanted.... Then the definitions all change....Democrats constantly change the meaning of words.
You can't terminate a human life no matter how you try to justify it.It can be anything you choose, but its not the common definition and in a political argument it rings desperate and false. The argument can be made without misusing words to create an emotional reaction. That is all I am saying.
O k , but what he or she is has everything to do with who is in that body....The issue, for me, is not what it is, but who has agency over their own body.
Each person does but a fetus is not a women's own body. That's a specious argument at bestThe issue, for me, is not what it is, but who has agency over their own body.
It is very common. Pretending you haven't heard a pregnant woman talking about her baby is just you babbling because you don't want to admit you are projecting nonsense into the conversation.It can be anything you choose, but its not the common definition and in a political argument it rings desperate and false. The argument can be made without misusing words to create an emotional reaction. That is all I am saying.
I haven't ever heard anyone say I'm having a clump of cellsIt depends on whether the baby is wanted or unwanted.... Then the definitions all change....
Have you.It is the termination of a life .. And it's understandable why they don't want to label it as such... That's a decision they will have to live with the rest of their lives....They are lucky he didn't go with terminating their lives.![]()
As long as they exercise that agency BEFORE conception after that we are talking about TWO humans. and the unborn deserves the right to live.The issue, for me, is not what it is, but who has agency over their own body.
I did not say I have never heard a pregnant woman talking about "her baby", In fact I am sure I did it when my wife was pregnant.It is very common. Pretending you haven't heard a pregnant woman talking about her baby is just you babbling because you don't want to admit you are projecting nonsense into the conversation.
Baby is not a scientific term and refers to humans from fetus to toddlers.
Things that you will hear "normally":
"When is your baby due?"
"Have you picked a name for your baby?"
"The baby is kicking, do you want to feel?"
Stop derping all over the thread. Fetus doesn't equal infant but baby means either of those things.
Child can also mean both of those things, and can mean someone that is even adult... I have adult children....
Those are all arguments, but not what I was discussing, dumb shit.As long as they exercise that agency BEFORE conception after that we are talking about TWO humans. and the unborn deserves the right to live.
It's used because it's a baby...I did not say I have never heard a pregnant woman talking about "her baby", In fact I am sure I did it when my wife was pregnant.
You know why it was used in that political argument. It was used to evoke emotion instead of logic.