Prove her wrong

[Konono]

She sounds like she crawled out from under a blue tarp in Oregon.
Talk show host, 'nuff said.

You can't prove her wrong?

 

[Leonthecat]

You can't prove her wrong?

Of course she is wrong. Unless you are a crackpot anarchist. You can not prove my assessment of her wrong.

 

[Konono]

Of course she is wrong. Unless you are a crackpot anarchist. You can not prove my assessment of her wrong.

Ok Legion/Runetroll.

 

[J Craft]

You can't prove her wrong?

She's not wrong, but she's also not comprehensive in her application of the constitution as it would apply to the current situation in Oregon.

 

[Leonthecat]

She's not wrong, but she's also not comprehensive in her application of the constitution as it would apply to the current situation in Oregon.

They want a war against our government. That part is always left unsaid by these nutjobs.

 

[ChoppedLiver]

Of course she is wrong. Unless you are a crackpot anarchist. You can not prove my assessment of her wrong.

It's as wrong as you on a constant basis.

 

[Leonthecat]

Ok Legion/Runetroll.

You want war against the US federal government? Do you think that is Right?

 

[Leonthecat]

It's as wrong as you on a constant basis.

Baby racist child is crying.

 

[evince]

where is all the thanks I was promised?

 

[Rune]

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17


To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of Particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;--

Sorry, not even close.
Due to the existence of the Northwest Territories the Property Clause (Article IV section III clause II was deemed needed.
The Property Clause provides for the scenarios noted by Taft.

Further, the wording is simple enough, Article I section 8 Clause 17 does not apply to states created from Federal Territory.
Don' you fucking read?

 

[evince]

they lie


its the only way to defend their historically failed ideas

 

[Rune]

She's not wrong, but she's also not comprehensive in her application of the constitution as it would apply to the current situation in Oregon.

Yes she is wrong.
She claims the Property Clause doesn't apply.
It certainly does.

 

[Rune]

Hey Desh I'm headed to church. Should I interrupt the service and announce that no one deals with FACTS here and when they all die they will be nothing but dirt in the ground and not going to heaven?

How is this comment in any way relevant or meaningful?

 

[Rune]

And Desh you hate everyone in this country. You want this union torn apart with your hate and racism

This comment is nothing more than malicious falsehood.
I find this post to be beneath you.

 

[Rune]

If the state had not given permission through their legislature they would, if you read the limitation in Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17, be unconstitutional.

She states that permission can be withdrawn as well, at which point the Federal government would have to return the property to the State.

Again, inaplicable due to the fact that the states in question were created from Federal territory and the right in question specifically withheld from the states.
The states agreed to this at the time of their creation.

 

[evince]

nothing is beneath him



he lies about me all the time and has done so for years now


he would follow me to other sites and lie about me

 

[Rune]

It is always easy to read only the portions you want to believe and ignore the restrictions. We do it often.

Sorry but the Western states are not existing in direct violation of Constitution no matter how many times you say so.

 

[Jarod]

Article IV, Section 3, Paragraph 2...

The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.

Nuff said.

 

[Jarod]

Again, inaplicable due to the fact that the states in question were created from Federal territory and the right in question specifically withheld from the states.
The states agreed to this at the time of their creation.

Look at the preamble to the Constitution of Nevada.

 

[Rune]

English, do you speak it?

Why are you intent upin trolling up this thread?
You are beside yourself that Evince is correct.