prospect of impeachment ?????? Really ?

Onceler said:
Uh, no bravs. I was being sarcastic. I argued with Yurt's premise that they're the same situation for about 3 days, so I was making fun of him.

Sorry about that; you're a little slow on the uptake, though, as you were chiming in on those threads, as well. Under no circumstances whatsoever do I think Iraq & Libya are "identical," or even similar in any way....
Click to expand...

You mean you didn't get Board Nazi Yurt's declaration that any post attempting humor must include at least one smiley to denote it's "humorlishesness"?

He spat out one of his patented angry little tantrums where he accused me of not posting a smiley when I made a joke and how my lack of a smiley confused him.

Don't violate his rules or else the BoardNazi Yurt is gonna getcha!
 
Rtber said:
Read the news much?

"President Obama's approval of an intervention in Libya has also skipped the Congress.

Was this necessary? Of course not. Obama could have consulted Congress; indeed, if the issue was pressing, he could have asked that the House and Senate be called into session over the weekend. Had the president gone to the Congress, it is doubtful that he would have met with opposition."

http://www.npr.org/2011/03/21/134730963/the-nation-in-libya-us-forgot-about-congress
Click to expand...

Ummm yeah, I read the news...and I also ask questions. AGAIN- the requirements of the WPA with regards to "consulting congress" are WIDE OPEN as to exactly what that "could" mean. According to Obama he DID consult congress- DO YOU HAVE PROOF that he is lying???
 
POST 94
​

Onceler said:
Uh, no bravs. I was being sarcastic. I argued with Yurt's premise that they're the same situation for about 3 days, so I was making fun of him.

Sorry about that; you're a little slow on the uptake, though, as you were chiming in on those threads, as well. Under no circumstances whatsoever do I think Iraq & Libya are "identical," or even similar in any way....
Click to expand...
POST 16
​

Quote Originally Posted by Yurt
iirc....the president's war powers, in that, he can conduct military action without approval from congress. i believe the time is 90 days...but we all know that isn't accurate, but i believe the case that established the president's power to engage our military without prior approval from congress was something like that...the act has essentially allowed the president virtually unlimited war powers...see iraq and afghanistan...i don't believe congress ever officially declared war for either of those military actions....

i'm not sure where i stand on the issue because i agree the president should have broad war powers to PROTECT this country from harm. that said, it is debatable that iraq or libya posed an imminent threat to our safety. libya being less of a threat than iraq. i don't understand how liberals can support our air invasion of libya, but be against the boots on the ground invasion of iraq.
Click to expand...
Quote Originally Posted by Onceler:
Since Iraq & Libya are identical situations, aren't you equally curious as to why bravo supported Iraq, but is on the side of impeachment w/ Libya?
Click to expand...
This post absolutely proves you really are the liar Yurt claims you are....
and I have the proof right here for all to see.....

Its clear that Yurt says things like

it is debatable that iraq or libya posed an imminent threat to our safety.
AND
libya being less of a threat than iraq
AND
i don't understand how liberals can support our air invasion of libya, "

While you clearly say
" Since Iraq & Libya are identical situations" and wonder about ME (Bravo) and what my views are....


Thats conclusive proof you are a liar......and a pathetic one at that...
 
bravo said:
POST 16
​

Quote Originally Posted by Yurt
Quote Originally Posted by Onceler:
This post absolutely proves you really are the liar Yurt claims you are....
and I have the proof right here for all to see.....

Its clear that Yurt says things like

it is debatable that iraq or libya posed an imminent threat to our safety.
AND
libya being less of a threat than iraq
AND
i don't understand how liberals can support our air invasion of libya, "

While you clearly say
" Since Iraq & Libya are identical situations" and wonder about ME (Bravo) and what my views are....


Thats conclusive proof you are a liar......and a pathetic one at that...
Click to expand...

Great post bravo-maybe now the oncler/yurt battle can be ended with yurt the declared winner- :D
 
Ice Dancer said:
Ummm yeah, I read the news...and I also ask questions. AGAIN- the requirements of the WPA with regards to "consulting congress" are WIDE OPEN as to exactly what that "could" mean. According to Obama he DID consult congress- DO YOU HAVE PROOF that he is lying???
Click to expand...

Do, I, personally have evidence in my possession that he lied?

No.
 
bravo said:
POST 94
​


POST 16
​

Quote Originally Posted by Yurt
Quote Originally Posted by Onceler:
This post absolutely proves you really are the liar Yurt claims you are....
and I have the proof right here for all to see.....

Its clear that Yurt says things like

it is debatable that iraq or libya posed an imminent threat to our safety.
AND
libya being less of a threat than iraq
AND
i don't understand how liberals can support our air invasion of libya, "

While you clearly say
" Since Iraq & Libya are identical situations" and wonder about ME (Bravo) and what my views are....


Thats conclusive proof you are a liar......and a pathetic one at that...
Click to expand...

I disagree wholeheartedly. Since this situation w/ Libya started, Yurt has been calling libbies out for their hypocrisy for supporting Libya but not Iraq. Just on its face, that implies the situations are, if not identical, VERY similar. But he expounded on that, and even argued that this is an invasion on par w/ the invasion of Iraq, going so far as to ludicrously tapdance his way through some explanation on how an "invasion of airspace" is just like any other invasion.

So, you're not correct. I appreciate your need to chime in when you barely know anything once again, but it is what it is. You're an extremely partisan fellow, so your responses are not surprising...
 
Onceler said:
I disagree wholeheartedly. Since this situation w/ Libya started, Yurt has been calling libbies out for their hypocrisy for supporting Libya but not Iraq. Just on its face, that implies the situations are, if not identical, VERY similar. But he expounded on that, and even argued that this is an invasion on par w/ the invasion of Iraq, going so far as to ludicrously tapdance his way through some explanation on how an "invasion of airspace" is just like any other invasion.

So, you're not correct. I appreciate your need to chime in when you barely know anything once again, but it is what it is. You're an extremely partisan fellow, so your responses are not surprising...
Click to expand...
You can disagree all you want...the proof is "written in the posts in clear and plain English"...no need to rely on what you think is implied...."its in plain English"

And the issue is your lying ...not in what Yurt thinks or you think he thinks...

Your own words need no interpretation...nice tap dance lad, but you're caught in your own posts....you are a liar....time to man up and move on....:palm:
 
bravo said:
You can disagree all you want...the proof is "written in the posts in clear and plain English"...no need to rely on what you think is implied...."its in plain English"

And the issue is your lying ...not in what Yurt thinks or you think he thinks...

Your own words need no interpretation...nice tap dance lad, but you're caught in your own posts....you are a liar....time to man up and move on....:palm:
Click to expand...

Man up to what? Your idiocy is somewhat relentless. Again, you were on the threads where I was arguing it w/ Yurt; not only do I not think Libya & Iraq are identical; I think they're not comparable at all.

I can see the furrowed brow & lack of comprehension, but there isn't much I can do about. You're an old guy - you ain't getting those brain cells back....
 
Onceler said:
Man up to what? Your idiocy is somewhat relentless. Again, you were on the threads where I was arguing it w/ Yurt; not only do I not think Libya & Iraq are identical; I think they're not comparable at all.

I can see the furrowed brow & lack of comprehension, but there isn't much I can do about. You're an old guy - you ain't getting those brain cells back....
Click to expand...

Yurt posted in post #7
You posted in post #16

Thats it...there ain't no mo...you're dismissed....
 
LOL

Okay, bravs. You're in over your head, as usual.

You really shouldn't try to jump in where you have absolutely no clue what's going on....
 
Onceler said:
LOL

Okay, bravs. You're in over your head, as usual.

You really shouldn't try to jump in where you have absolutely no clue what's going on....
Click to expand...
OK dude...I'll keep that in mind....sorry about this....really....

You lost a lot of respect with a lot of people over this silly shit....you shouldn't have let it go this far...its best to man up and move on....you've just given yourself a black eye that gonna haunt you for a long time....too bad.:(
 
Rtber said:
Better tell Rep. Boehner.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20045378-503544.html
Click to expand...

Let's see- So far Obama has claimed he consulted with members of congress- You state that you cannot dispove that claim- and now you post a link where House leader Boehner says the president needs to "consult more with congress" not that he has not consulted at all...

From your link:

"House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), along with other top Republicans, are warning President Obama to consult more with Congress before stepping up military action in Libya."
 
Ice Dancer said:
Let's see- So far Obama has claimed he consulted with members of congress- You state that you cannot dispove that claim- and now you post a link where House leader Boehner says the president needs to "consult more with congress" not that he has not consulted at all...

From your link:

"House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), along with other top Republicans, are warning President Obama to consult more with Congress before stepping up military action in Libya."
Click to expand...

"Despite the fact President Barack Obama did not consult with Congress before he sent the United States military into action against Moammar Gadhafi's military, congressional reaction has been uneasy but muted — with certain exceptions.

For the most part, members of Congress are muttering about they should have been consulted"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20110321...ional_liberals_horrified_at_obamas_libyan_war
 
Ice Dancer said:
Let's see- So far Obama has claimed he consulted with members of congress- You state that you cannot dispove that claim- and now you post a link where House leader Boehner says the president needs to "consult more with congress" not that he has not consulted at all...

From your link:

"House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), along with other top Republicans, are warning President Obama to consult more with Congress before stepping up military action in Libya."
Click to expand...

Rep. Allen West: Congress Not Consulted Before U.S. Attack on Libya (Video)

http://factreal.wordpress.com/2011/...t-consulted-before-u-s-attack-on-libya-video/
 
bravo said:
You can disagree all you want...the proof is "written in the posts in clear and plain English"...no need to rely on what you think is implied...."its in plain English"

And the issue is your lying ...not in what Yurt thinks or you think he thinks...

Your own words need no interpretation...nice tap dance lad, but you're caught in your own posts....you are a liar....time to man up and move on....:palm:
Click to expand...


How about that? Bravo can obviously READ ONCELER'S MIND!

How else could he possibly purport to tell Onceler what he REALLY MEANT to say?

Yet another typical Rightie who thinks he can channel the Amazing Kreskin to tell us Liberals what we REALLY meant...

How's that special power workin out for ya so far?

Jesus GOD you morons will say or go to ANY lengths to try and spread horseshit about Liberals...and frankly, it's just sad!
 
Rtber said:
"Despite the fact President Barack Obama did not consult with Congress before he sent the United States military into action against Moammar Gadhafi's military, congressional reaction has been uneasy but muted — with certain exceptions.

For the most part, members of Congress are muttering about they should have been consulted"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20110321...ional_liberals_horrified_at_obamas_libyan_war
Click to expand...

It is obvious that Obama did not have a formal meeting with congress- but as I noted previously the languge used in the WPA is quite general with regards to what that consulting MUST be. Mutterings aside-Obama "claims" he consulted with members of congress-Your link to Boehner's statement was that he wants Obama to consult "more"... Now since you admit you are in no position to "prove" Obama is lying...how about we just concede that Obama certainly has not lived up to the spirit of the WPA and call it good?
 
Ice Dancer said:
Let's see- So far Obama has claimed he consulted with members of congress- You state that you cannot dispove that claim- and now you post a link where House leader Boehner says the president needs to "consult more with congress" not that he has not consulted at all...

From your link:

"House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), along with other top Republicans, are warning President Obama to consult more with Congress before stepping up military action in Libya."
Click to expand...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi..._have_intervened_in_a_civil_war_in_libya.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top