Professor Hal Lewis Joins The Global Warming Policy Foundation

Yup and it's why I'm no longer a Republican. It's become the party of plutocrats and their ruby throated American vassals.





The government has no right to limit co2 emissions, as they aren't a pollutant.

I could make a market out of your mama's ass. That's doesn't make it right to do so; just liking making a market out of slaves doesn't make slavery moral either.
 
Uhmmm.... ALL of it! :good4u:

The Western Fuel parrot speaks...

squawkers-mccaw.jpg


Dixie post #59 - Emeritus Professor of Physics resigns over AGW FRAUD!

There is no consensus on man's effect regarding the current warming trend. There is a theory that CO2 amplifies the greenhouse effect, but since CO2 is only a small fraction of greenhouse gases, it remains to be seen how much (if any) of an amplified effect it has on the current warming trend. Most of the greenhouse gas is water vapor, and without the greenhouse effect, we couldn't live on the planet, life couldn't survive here. The most important benefit to an increased concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, is increased healthiness of plant life. CO2 causes plants to retain more moisture, thus enabling plants to grow in much more arid environments. We presently have a concentration of about 360ppm CO2 in our atmosphere, if that increased to say... 600ppm or so... you might see deserts become lush rain forests. The world hunger problem could be solved, as we could grow food virtually anywhere on the planet.

----------------------------------
In 1991, Western Fuels spent an estimated $250,000 to produce and distribute a video entitled "The Greening of Planet Earth," which was shown frequently inside the Bush White House as well as within the governments of OPEC. In near-evangelical tones, the video promises that a new age of agricultural abundance will result from increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide. It portrays a world where vast areas of desert are reclaimed by the carbon dioxide-forced growth of new grasslands, where the earth's diminishing forests are replenished by a nurturing atmosphere. Unfortunately, it overlooks the bugs. Experts note that even a minor elevation in temperature would trigger an explosion in the planet's insect population, leading to potentially significant disruptions in food supplies from crop damage as well as to a surge in insect-borne diseases. It appears that Western Fuels' video fails to tell people what the termites in New Orleans may be trying to tell them now.


Real firmness is good for anything; strut is good for nothing.
Alexander Hamilton
 
For the longest time the line from deniers was that global warming was happening, it just wasn't caused by man. Instead, it was caused by sunspots. Why? No real reason. That's what denialism is.

Now, of course, they are claiming the data is faked and that there is no warming. Which is it?

Again, they aren't consistent and don't intend to be. The truth isn't relevant to deniers, it's an entirely ideological, almost religious obsession.

So, the earth isn't warming and it's caused by sunspots.
 
For the longest time the line from deniers was that global warming was happening, it just wasn't caused by man. Instead, it was caused by sunspots. Why? No real reason. That's what denialism is.

Now, of course, they are claiming the data is faked and that there is no warming. Which is it?

Again, they aren't consistent and don't intend to be. The truth isn't relevant to deniers, it's an entirely ideological, almost religious obsession.

So, the earth isn't warming and it's caused by sunspots.

Yeah. And then there's Rahm Emanuel saying they need to call it "climate disruption", because there is no real warming.

The truth isn't relevant to anti-human energy totalitarians, who wish to marketize the right to respiration and strangle parts of humanity out of existence due to their nihilist anti-human elitist paradigm. .
 
Hal Lewis' resignation from the American Physical Society just didn't pass the sniff test. Now we find out why. Lewis joined the Global Warming Policy Foundation, an organization with ties to the 20 year misinformation campaign by the oil and coal industries that definitely doesn't pass any sniff tests. The GWPF is located at 1 Carlton House Terrace, London, in a room rented from the Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining and lists Benny Peiser, a social anthropologist, as the director.

Benny Peiser is a UK social anthropologist on the Heartland Institute "Global warming experts" list. Peiser is a Social Anthropologist, and not a Climate Scientist. According to a search of 22,000 academic journals, Peiser has published 3 research papers in peer-reviewed journals: Sports Medicine, 2006; Journal of Sports Sciences (2004); and, Bioastronomy 2002: life among the stars (2004). None of these studies are related to human-induced climate change.

In Lewis' resignation letter he cites “Climategate” emails as evidence scientists at East Anglia’s world-leading Climate Research Unit were rigging evidence in favor of man-made climate change...they DON'T.

The manufactured controversy over emails stolen from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit has generated a lot more heat than light. The email content being quoted does not indicate that climate data and research have been compromised. Most importantly, nothing in the content of these stolen emails has any impact on our overall understanding that human activities are driving dangerous levels of global warming. Media reports and contrarian claims that they do are inaccurate.

Investigations Clear Scientists of Wrongdoing

* Factcheck.org says claims against scientists misrepresent the content of the emails.

* Penn State University cleared scientist Michael Mann (pdf) of wrongdoing.

* An independent investigation commissioned by the University of East Anglia found no evidence of fraud or deceit.

* A UK Parliament report concluded that the emails have no bearing on our understanding of climate science and that claims against UEA scientists are misleading.

-----------------------------------------------------

Professor Hal Lewis Joins The GWPF

Tuesday, 12 October 2010 09:17 administrator


The Global Warming Policy Foundation is delighted and honoured to announce that Professor Harold (Hal) Lewis, one of America's most distinguished physicists, has agreed to join our Academic Advisory Council.

Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara. He is a former member of the Defense Science Board and former chairman of its Technology panel. He was co-founder and former Chairman of JASON and a former member of the USAF Scientific Advisory Board. On 6 October 2010, he resigned from the American Physical Society, 67 years after he had joined the APS, in protest over the politicalisation of climate research and the stifling of scientific debate.

The GWPF Academic Advisory Council is composed of researchers, scientists, economists and science authors who provide the GWPF with timely scientific, economic and policy advice. It evaluates new studies and reports, explores future research projects and makes recommendations on issues related to climate research and policy.


If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands.
Douglas Adams

Wow... the above is the same type of ignorance the cowardly Cypress used to post. you may wish to rethink uttering such ignorance or you may end up like that coward.... sitting in a dark room, afraid to come out because he was busted for being the creepy stalking fucker that he was.

Guess what... the BP panel that BP put together also found that BP was not at fault for the gulf spill. AMAZING how that keeps happening. Groups that find themselves innocent. Truly shocking.

Note... not ONE of the 'independent' investigations was even looking at the 'SCIENCE'. Those so called 'independent' reviews were nothing more than a white wash.
 
For the longest time the line from deniers was that global warming was happening, it just wasn't caused by man. Instead, it was caused by sunspots. Why? No real reason. That's what denialism is.

Now, of course, they are claiming the data is faked and that there is no warming. Which is it?

Again, they aren't consistent and don't intend to be. The truth isn't relevant to deniers, it's an entirely ideological, almost religious obsession.

So, the earth isn't warming and it's caused by sunspots.

total irony in the above.... the entire premise of AGW is that 'we can't figure out a natural reason, so it must be man'.
 
What alarmist scenario? I didnt' even portray one. I just simple stated a fact. That CO2 can most certainly be a pollutant and that you didn't know what you were talking about when you said it wasn't.

It most certainly is not a pollutant. Mistatement of facts like that are the alarmism I'm referencing.
 
Would you like to stifle free speech?

Co2 isn't a pollutant. There, i said it again.

you gonna do something about it?
No, but I would suggest that you go into a room with 20% CO2 in it for an hour and then come out and tell me it's not a pollutant. If you can do that, then you will have scientifically proven me wrong. Then again if I'm right, you'll be dead. You game? :)
 
No, but I would suggest that you go into a room with 20% CO2 in it for an hour and then come out and tell me it's not a pollutant. If you can do that, then you will have scientifically proven me wrong. Then again if I'm right, you'll be dead. You game? :)

people could die from too much of anything. But everything is not a pollutant. doy.

You're moronic.
 
No, but I would suggest that you go into a room with 20% CO2 in it for an hour and then come out and tell me it's not a pollutant. If you can do that, then you will have scientifically proven me wrong. Then again if I'm right, you'll be dead. You game? :)

how about an easier one.... we will pump the room with 338ppm.... you tell us how toxic it is.
 
Yeah. And then there's Rahm Emanuel saying they need to call it "climate disruption", because there is no real warming.

The truth isn't relevant to anti-human energy totalitarians, who wish to marketize the right to respiration and strangle parts of humanity out of existence due to their nihilist anti-human elitist paradigm. .

What you just posted is off the reservation.

What I find unbelievable is the level of brainwashing the corporate funded echo chamber has achieved. You would be the poster boy. The irony is the dirty energy corporations and mining cartels are treating OUR planet like a liquidation sale and destroying the commons that everyone owns. And the people that are promoting responsible environmental stewardship are being accused of being the force of evil.

You live is some alternate universe.



The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie -- deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.
President John F. Kennedy
 
What you just posted is off the reservation.

What I find unbelievable is the level of brainwashing the corporate funded echo chamber has achieved. You would be the poster boy. The irony is the dirty energy corporations and mining cartels are treating OUR planet like a liquidation sale and destroying the commons that everyone owns. And the people that are promoting responsible environmental stewardship are being accused of being the force of evil.

You live is some alternate universe.



The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie -- deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.
President John F. Kennedy


Many corporations will benefit from the carbon credit market.

It makes no sense that co2 be declared a pollutant, it's the equivalent of oxygen to plants.


Reservation for you: Stupid, party of 1.
 
Back
Top