Pro lifers show no mercy

I've never heard of or met anyone that was pro abortion. Just pro choice.
I suspect you've never heard of or met anyone you like who tells the truth, either.

When you've heard or met someone who has had an abortion, what does that make her at that time? Right. Pro-Abortion. She can't be pro-choice when she's already made her choice. She's essentially progressed in her enlightenment from "pro-choice" to "pro-abortion".
 
I was pretty clear; most abortions are due to unwanted pregnancies.

You can’t get your head around the fact that unwanted pregnancies is something that is completely preventable with responsible behavior.

Carry on; it would be a waste of time to constantly wallow in a never ending circle of stupidity with you and dealing with your never ending parade of strawman arguments no one has made.

You are the one judging the women here. That is YOUR opinion. And thankfully, with the Pill, more bc options, and abortion, women have all the options they need to act as they please. You can judge them, that's fine. Much of American society still calls women who are promiscuous as 'sluts' while men are 'studs.' Wallow in your hypocrisy all you like.

I think men are just pissed they no longer have the same control over women...now that women, if they choose...can have sex without consequences. (If you call pregnancy, labor, the risk of life-long health issues or death, and abortion 'without' consequences.)

Since you claim it, how are they anymore 'irresponsible' than then men they are having sex with? Did he not make exactly the same choice to have sex as she did?
 
When you've heard or met someone who has had an abortion, what does that make her at that time? Right. Pro-Abortion. She can't be pro-choice when she's already made her choice. She's essentially progressed in her enlightenment from "pro-choice" to "pro-abortion".


LMAO...this is 'your version' of logic? What a joke.

You obviously were unable to process my last post to you....couldnt even respond properly. Not surprising.
 
Using the wrong words to attempt a discussion just doesnt get you far. Sorry.

There's no 'killing' and there's no 'babies.'

You may choose to use those terms but unless you are the family that CHOOSES to be invested in a pregnancy, they are meaningless and quite honestly, none of your business.

ah, so you don't understand the clear meaning of words.......killing is the ending of life.......unless you are a science denier and refuse to accept the fact that an unborn child is alive, there is no misunderstanding that ending that life is killing......

as to "babies", until the liberal left begins holding "fetus" showers instead of "baby" showers, its clear that one does not consider the unborn to be anything less than a baby until one chooses to kill it......
 
ah, so you don't understand the clear meaning of words.......killing is the ending of life.......unless you are a science denier and refuse to accept the fact that an unborn child is alive, there is no misunderstanding that ending that life is killing......

as to "babies", until the liberal left begins holding "fetus" showers instead of "baby" showers, its clear that one does not consider the unborn to be anything less than a baby until one chooses to kill it......

Here's the last line again, in case you missed it:

"You may choose to use those terms but unless you are the family that CHOOSES to be invested in a pregnancy, they are meaningless and quite honestly, none of your business."
 
Sometimes we have to make difficult choices in life, so that life in general gets better. Much like divorce. It's generally better (or expected to be) for those involved, including kids, even tho it's a difficult thing to do. I've heard that divorce is one of the worst things in life to go thru....and affects you for the rest of your life....but is still ends up as the right decision.

do you believe that killing an unborn child is the better thing to do for the unborn child?.......
 
Rave on, liberal. You know I'm right.

Oh, we both understand what you were saying. Problem is, you weren't expecting me to show proper insight. ;)

I dont think I've seen a post in this forum yet where you are right, lololol.

And your track record has not changed.

Wait...you ARE RIGHT! You cannot be expected to show the proper insight! LMAO (Lordy, thanks for that one.)
 
You said I claimed it. You can't even show where it was implied or what you are misrepresenting. You are a delusional paranoid schizophrenic at best and at worst a proven liar.

when you started a thread "Pro-lifers show no mercy" did you believe it was mercy to kill unborn children?.....
 
do you believe that killing an unborn child is the better thing to do for the unborn child?.......

It's not a child either. YOU can CHOOSE to invest your personal emotions in a fetus that might or might not ever be born and is NONE of your business and that's fine.

As long as you dont try to force your emotions and choices on women.
 
Here's the last line again, in case you missed it:

"You may choose to use those terms but unless you are the family that CHOOSES to be invested in a pregnancy, they are meaningless and quite honestly, none of your business."
Murder is everyone's business, Lorca. The SC got it wrong, and now it's our duty as citizens to make things right.
 
Here's the last line again, in case you missed it:

"You may choose to use those terms but unless you are the family that CHOOSES to be invested in a pregnancy, they are meaningless and quite honestly, none of your business."

so basically, you are okay with letting people kill their unborn children if they CHOOSE to....I understood that clearly.....that is what we are discussing......the fact you are okay with it is not a defense to being okay with it......

if a man chooses to kill his wife are you okay with that or does it now become "your business"?......
 
If it means the "hostess" (AKA "Mother") might be forced to eat Ramen noodles instead of steak, yes, it seems.

Yup....and just how nutritional are ramen noodles for babies? Toddlers? Kids?

If a mother even ignores good nutrition and health habits during pregnancy (yeah, like when she doesnt care about what she's carrying?) much less cant feed kids properly after birth, it can affect their mental & physical development.

Are you planning on force feeding women, as well as forcing them to carry fetuses they dont want? (rhetorical...but illuminating, lol)
 
so basically, you are okay with letting people kill their unborn children if they CHOOSE to....I understood that clearly.....that is what we are discussing......the fact you are okay with it is not a defense to being okay with it......

if a man chooses to kill his wife are you okay with that or does it now become "your business"?......

Killing her is not ok because it is an infringement on her right to life.
 
Back
Top