Pro lifers show no mercy

Also TD, if anything, your post should prove why abortion is an unfortunate, but needed, option. Just look at the income levels attributed to the women choosing abortion. Or your bold: sure, bring a kid into the world when it damages your future ability to afford other children, you are not emotionally ready, or into a dysfunctional family.

Now that is sound, solid "righty' thinking! LMAO

Yeah, you're doing all those 'babies' a HUGE favor.

Sometimes you can make really stupid comments based on ideology. Who forced those women to get impregnated if they already can't support the children they have? Where are the baby daddies?

Abortion is a very bad excuse for poor choices and irrational behavior don't you think? As for the story at the beginning of this thread, yes there can be exceptions. Your version of abortion on demand just does not make rational or moral sense.
 
Sometimes you can make really stupid comments based on ideology. Who forced those women to get impregnated if they already can't support the children they have? Where are the baby daddies?

Abortion is a very bad excuse for poor choices and irrational behavior don't you think? As for the story at the beginning of this thread, yes there can be exceptions. Your version of abortion on demand just does not make rational or moral sense.

There are no exceptions in the laws you support. Many pro-choicer advocates have supported bans on late term abortions so long as there are exceptions for severe fetal abnormalities and the health of the mother. Abortion opponents know that will leave most late term abortions legal and so they have rejected it.
 
Last edited:
Sometimes you can make really stupid comments based on ideology. Who forced those women to get impregnated if they already can't support the children they have? Where are the baby daddies?

Abortion is a very bad excuse for poor choices and irrational behavior don't you think? As for the story at the beginning of this thread, yes there can be exceptions. Your version of abortion on demand just does not make rational or moral sense.


The mere act of accidentally getting pregnant is no more irresponsible than the mere act of breaking your leg while skiing. It happens...with or without precautions. Are you suggesting people stop having sex if they cannot guarantee no pregnancy will occur?

It's not irresponsible if they act responsibly about it. They have options, obviously.....you just dont like one of them. As pointed out above, women choose pregnant so that they can maintain the responsibilities *they already have.*. And it wasnt even my source, lol.

Define 'irresponsible?' Who are they shoving their responsibilities off on if they have an abortion? Not the taxpayers. HAVING a kid you cant afford is certainly ONE VERY irresponsible act.
 
Seriously? Accidental pregnancies are irresponsible. You can't be this dumb!

[h=2]WHY ARE ABORTIONS PERFORMED?[/h]
  • On average, women give at least 3 reasons for choosing abortion: 3/4 say that having a baby would interfere with work, school or other responsibilities; about 3/4 say they cannot afford a child; and 1/2 say they do not want to be a single parent or are having problems with their husband or partner (AGI).


  • That sounds like acting responsibly to me.
 
how can killing your children ever be considered responsible?.....

Being uneducated about the basics of the English language is pretty irresponsible too and I see it every day....much more than abortion.

Words have meanings....try using them correctly. Then you wont have the excuse to whine so much about something that is none of your business.
 
???....does the accusation thus become a justification?....."we aren't sympathetic so we bear no blame!"......



???...this was my first post to the thread, I have shifted nothing.....

You certainly shifted focus. There have not been 50 million third trimester D&X abortions since 1972. You are constantly dropping context in order to squirm away from facts that don't support your views. No one has suggested that severe fetal abnormalities is the justification for all abortions as you claimed. You are nothing but a liar.
 
Is that the pro-life position?

That depends on whether or not one considers it worthwhile to stop mass murderers or not. Are we our brother's keeper, and does the deity of moral conduct and humanism expect the world community to stop dictators when able? People have been debating just war doctrine for some time. I think keeping the stabilizing force that was Saddam in power would have been better for our national interests.
 
There hasn't been an abortion clinic bombing in decades. The pro life movement has long ago moved away from leftist tactics such as blocking abortion center doors with protests.

The pro lifers have lawyered up. An army of lawyers fighting the other side on a state by state basis such as in this state that this sob story came from.
 
Absolutely heartless and disgusting lawmakers overstepping and causing such pain.

Does that couple look like they can afford a special needs child? And properly take care of the kids they have? How many people would be stepping up to adopt that child, if it survived?

I knew a family that did foster care. They had a couple of kids like that. Once they were too big to be lifted and carried around, then ended up in *storage* like cordwood in state facilities.

More crocodile tears from the occultist.
 
The mere act of accidentally getting pregnant is no more irresponsible than the mere act of breaking your leg while skiing. It happens...with or without precautions. Are you suggesting people stop having sex if they cannot guarantee no pregnancy will occur?

Are you being purposefully stupid to mask your foolish attempts to defend the indefensible?

You claiming that statistics provided of unwanted pregnancies were all accidental require the willing suspension of disbelief. Just as your moronic claims that the ONLY way one cannot get pregnant is to stop having sex.

Dumb; really dumb.

It's not irresponsible if they act responsibly about it.

What is responsible of having careless sex with men who want nothing to do with your children and getting pregnant?

They have options, obviously.....you just dont like one of them.

I don’t like making excuses for irresponsible behavior resulting in the mass killing of unwanted babies. But this debate as evidenced by your comments is way beyond your myopic ability to comprehend.

As pointed out above, women choose pregnant so that they can maintain the responsibilities *they already have.*. And it wasnt even my source, lol.

This doesn’t make any sense; they CHOSE abortions after acting irresponsible by getting impregnated by men who want nothing to do with them other have unprotected sex. It is dimwitted and suggests that women engaging in such behavior are incredibly stupid.

Define 'irresponsible?

No shocker here; liberals seldom can comprehend what is irresponsible. How about women spreading their legs for men who want nothing to do with you for purely sexual purposes and then having an unwanted pregnancy? I don’t know a better definition of irresponsible.

' Who are they shoving their responsibilities off on if they have an abortion? Not the taxpayers.

This is a strawman; no one has made that claim. The irresponsible behavior results in the tragic act of abortion that NO one feels good about in the end.

HAVING a kid you cant afford is certainly ONE VERY irresponsible act.

Huh? Above you obtusely claim you don’t know what being irresponsible is. You really must be THAT dumb.
 
Back
Top