SmarterthanYou
rebel
so you prefer a government that tells you what you can and cannot do, got it. rights aren't important anymore. does that make you feel safer?
Police Shoot Man For Recording Them With Phone, They Feared For Their Lives
- Thread starter cancel2 2022
- Start date
so you prefer a government that tells you what you can and cannot do, got it. rights aren't important anymore. does that make you feel safer?
l thought you were serious. Just as I predicted, you provided an excuse. Big mouth, no action.
Apparently you don't since you support drunk drivers being allowed to drive drunk and only be punished AFTER they kill innocent people.
Tell me when and where, with evidence to back it up, or be proven to be another lying nigger boy.
No. Crime is defined as an illegal act. I thought you claimed to be smart. Apparently all you are is a stupid smartass.
Fact is you refused to answer my question. By refusing to do so directly, along with the attitude given during your refusal, you actually answered it anyway.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
and this is why you're not a conservative. you believe that the government can regulate your entire life by simply writing a law making something a crime, even though there is no victim.
just accept that you're a liberal who loves big government. your life might be easier. your wife might be disappointed, but i'll take care of her for you.
Are you saying drunk driving isn't a crime unless someone is hurt or killed? Wait, you've already answered that by admitting you have no problem with innocent people being killed by drunk drivers as long as they can drive drunk.
You can stop with the wife stuff. We both know you haven't been near her. Anyone that says he would do what you said then hides behind his computer is nothing to worry about. A tiny dick coward with a big mouth that would shit his pants if faced with adversity. You're kind is easy to spot. Your hiding is proof.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
and since we already know you are completely apathetic about innocent people being convicted by corrupt police tactics in crime labs, here's another one
http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/10/20k_dwi_cases_could_be_tossed_amid_state_police_pr.html
Prosecutors in New Jersey are notifying more than 20,000 people charged with drunken driving that their cases are under review after a State Police sergeant who oversaw breath-testing devices was accused of falsifying records, NJ Advance Media has learned.
County prosecutors have been sending letters to people charged with driving while intoxicated between 2008 and 2016 informing them a specially appointed judge would weigh "whether you are entitled to relief" based on the accusations against the sergeant.
Prosecutors and defense attorneys told NJ Advance Media the number of cases that could be thrown out as a result of the criminal inquiry is likely low. But the issue, which came amid a similar probe of the State Police drug lab, created a morass of legal challenges which could take years to sort out.
Sgt. Marc Dennis, a coordinator in the State Police Alcohol Drug Testing Unit, was accused last year of lying on official documents about completing a legally required step in re-calibrating the machines, known as Alcotest devices, which are used to check the blood-alcohol level of accused drunken drivers.
The sergeant, who denies the charges against him, was allegedly observed skipping the step in calibrating just three machines. But the criminal accusations raised a cloud of doubt over every device touched by the trooper, who performed routine checks on devices used by local police across five counties.
"Sergeant Dennis' alleged false swearing and improper calibrations of these three instruments may call into question all of the calibrations performed by Sergeant Dennis over the course of his career as a coordinator," said one letter, a copy of which was obtained by NJ Advance Media.
The letters were sent in recent weeks to DWI defendants in Middlesex, Monmouth, Ocean, Somerset, and Union counties.
Dennis was charged in September 2016 with second-degree official misconduct, third-degree tampering with public records and fourth degree falsifying records. He was indicted on those same charges in December, but the misconduct charge was dropped in a second indictment in June, records show.
His attorney, Robert Ebberup, said Dennis denied any wrongdoing.
"At the end of the day, I'm sure he is going to be exonerated," Ebberup said.
In the meantime, a retired appellate judge, Joseph Lisa, is sorting through the thicket of as many as 20,667 cases affected by the claims against the sergeant.
According to an April Supreme Court order apponting him as "special master," Lisa will rule on whether Dennis' alleged failure to perform a preliminary temperature check required under Supreme Court rules would "undermine or call into question the scientific reliability of breath tests subsequently performed" on those devices.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
You might have a point, if you can show where he alerted the cops that he was just using his phone to record the situation; but until then, this is just you whining again.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Probably until you stop acting like a know-it-all, with a butthurt agenda.
You've been asked this a few times; but you always become obtuse and then run away.
What happened to you, in your life, that started you on your "walk of woe"??
SmarterthanYou
rebel
i'm not the one refusing to answer simple questions, so who's really butthurt?
and i've answered this before, but for simplicity's sake, I'll do it again. In the beginning, it was not me but a friend of mine. Shortly after the new concealed carry law passed here in TX, my friend obtained his CHL, so he was all 'legal' according to the law. One night we're up at the junior high school parking lot with some other people talking about the next steps we wanted to take concerning open carry when 7 local cops pulled up on us. Upon demanding ID, my friend showed his CHL (as required by law) and they immediately handcuffed him and started searching his car where they found his legally stored handgun. Apparently one of the cops didn't care for the new CHL law thinking that non cops shouldn't be allowed to carry at all, so he started placing him under arrest. Mind you, he was not breaking the law because it is LEGAL to have a handgun in your vehicle on school grounds if you have a license. They ALL knew this and the other 6 cops tried to talk him out of it because my friend was 2 weeks away from starting to obtain his TCLEOS certification to be a cop himself. This cop didn't care, he was arresting him anyway and the other 6 cops did NOTHING!!!!!
So, the end result was 1 cop arrested a person UNLAWFULLY for NOT BREAKING A LAW and the other 6 cops did NOTHING to stop him, thus preventing my friend from obtaining his dream of being a cop.
so until other cops start arresting or STOPPING bad cops, they are all bad. and it's hilarious you call it 'woe', which obviously means you apathetically accept bad cops because you are afraid and need their protection.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
With all your "explanation", I see absolutely nothing regarding the outcome of this "arrest"; ie. court?!
Or how this "stopped" your friend from becoming a cop?!
Nor any action taken by your friend, regarding an unlawful arrest?!
Sadly in many places & in many instances they can be a law unto themselves & can literally get away w/ murder.......
Is it ok to shoot ppl on your job for pointing a phone @ you??
cancel2 2022
Canceled
So if there was a TV crew filming some cops are they perfectly at liberty to shoot them?
Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
SmarterthanYou
rebel
the outcome ended up with charges being dismissed because there was no law broken. it stopped him because you cannot have an arrest record to obtain your certification. there wasn't any action to take for an unlawful arrest because it was one of the first arrests after the law went in to effect, therefore the cop had qualified immunity, and no lawyer would help him sue on contingency nor could he afford the thousands it would take to have the arrest removed from his record.
does that satisfy you now? or are you going to call me a liar because you worship government enforcement agents and they can do no wrong in your book?