Plummeting Marijuana Prices Create A Panic In Calif.

usaloyal2theend said:
That's right $chit$chtik. The point, as was so obviously made in bold, is there is still so much that they do not know, just as it was in the beginning with every other poison we inhale, ingest, shoot into our bodies.

But I say if it's an opportunity for you to shriek like a pussy, by all means go for it!

Now until then, please go suck on the pipe that leads out of the pit toilet. The study still isn't in about the "true effects", beside the obvious that you're full of it
Click to expand...

Lot's of drugs have side effects, even ones avaiable OTC. So?

Even though the jury is still out, I am pretty sure, marijuana is not for everyone. But we could say that about a lot of legal products, many that provide tremendous benefits to millions of people.

All relevant data shows that marijuana is relatively benign.
 
RStringfield said:
Lot's of drugs have side effects, even ones avaiable OTC. So?

Even though the jury is still out, I am pretty sure, marijuana is not for everyone. But we could say that about a lot of legal products, many that provide tremendous benefits to millions of people.

All relevant data shows that marijuana is relatively benign.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that's what the data showed. :palm:
 
usaloyal2theend said:
That's right $chit$chtik. The point, as was so obviously made in bold, is there is still so much that they do not know, just as it was in the beginning with every other poison we inhale, ingest, shoot into our bodies.

But I say if it's an opportunity for you to shriek like a pussy, by all means go for it!

Now until then, please go suck on the pipe that leads out of the pit toilet. The study still isn't in about the "true effects", beside the obvious that you're full of it
Click to expand...

Such a level headed response to my comments...My my my but you've certainly shown everyone how simple it is for you to avoid all the namecalling and stick to the discussion...

The point I was making was that your article was nothing more than inflammatory conjecture and that you posted it anyway only shows how uninformed you really are on this and every other topic.
 
RStringfield said:
Lot's of drugs have side effects, even ones avaiable OTC. So?

Even though the jury is still out, I am pretty sure, marijuana is not for everyone. But we could say that about a lot of legal products, many that provide tremendous benefits to millions of people.

All relevant data shows that marijuana is relatively benign.
Click to expand...

But Stringy, you're missing the BIG picture here.

If it allows disloyal the mental skidmark to spew her venom some more and take another shot at belittling me, then by God she's down with it. Evidence to the contrary be damned.
 
Last edited:
usaloyal2theend said:
Yeah, that's what the data showed. :palm:
Click to expand...

Then tell us what are the always toxic effects of marijuana? You give us stuff largely related to how the drug is taken and bunch of vague stuff about how it MAY affect people with pre-existing conditions.

So, it's probably not a good idea to smoke Viagra or take it if you have a heart condition. The rest of us will be on the lookout for that four-hour boner and putting out the do not disturb sign.

There are possible negative health effects, but they are relatively minor, and individuals are quite capable of making their own rational decisions on whether to use or not. Read the sign.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Such a level headed response to my comments...My my my but you've certainly shown everyone how simple it is for you to avoid all the namecalling and stick to the discussion...

The point I was making was that your article was nothing more than inflammatory conjecture and that you posted it anyway only shows how uninformed you really are on this and every other topic.
Click to expand...
.



No you big whining pussy. Your intent was to pick up your bloomers and shriek like an outraged girl.

You've got that role down pat.

Now how about a voice over to really fool them? Just think of the BOOM! you could lend Bob's Big Boy!!!
 
ZappasGuitar said:
But Stringy, you're missing the BIG picture here.

If it allows disloyal the mental skidmark to spew her venom some more and take another shot at belittling me, then by God she's down with it. Evidence to the contrary be damned.
Click to expand...

Zap. You don't need to have an excuse to get the munchies. You left that behind at 350lbs. Why don't you accessorize your feedbag(s)? Have Flat Stanley sew up a variety of colors to go with all your sweatpants and Frank Zappa T-shirts, eh?

Mental Skidmarks? Fer chrissakes Zap. You're so fat now your skidmarks are now named interstates!

I say you suck in real deep on your joint. Bring that tar into your lower lung and hold it there for a good long time...
 
Southern Man said:
So? legalization will still cripple the cartels.
Click to expand...

Fixed.

Overall, 51% of Americans don't vote, but there are still millions too many morons and cretins and proles (oh, my!) who do vote, so I wish to legalize drugs and get as many of these people to quite it, already, for whatever reason...
 
Big Gay Al said:
That's something you've been unable to prove. Repealing the alcohol ban did nothing to reward the bootleggers and organized crime back in the 30's.
Click to expand...
The cartels are the manufacturers, and the manufacturer's benefited greatly from repeal of prohibition.
 
Southern Man said:
So? legalization will still reward the cartels.
Click to expand...

Yeah, we have heard your assertion. Now offer some argument in support of it. That's how it works. Or, as usual, you can just keeping repeating your baseless assertion until somebody calls you a moron (or some variant), then claim your little victory.
 
Southern Man said:
The cartels are the manufacturers, and the manufacturer's benefited greatly from repeal of prohibition.
Click to expand...

Uhhh, manufacturers of alcohol benefitted, but they were mostly different manufacturers. Which brewer/distiller was thoroughly engaged in the illegal markets of alcohol then benefitted from repeal?

I am sure Bacardi did not turn away all rum runners, but their business model was nothing like that of the Mexican cartels. How many people did Ron Bacardi kidnap?
 
RStringfield said:
Uhhh, manufacturers of alcohol benefitted, but they were mostly different manufacturers. Which brewer/distiller was thoroughly engaged in the illegal markets of alcohol then benefitted from repeal?

I am sure Bacardi did not turn away all rum runners, but their business model was nothing like that of the Mexican cartels. How many people did Ron Bacardi kidnap?
Click to expand...
He didn't have to, since he still had plenty of legal business in Cuba, and probably Central America and Europe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top