Pedophile, school shooter, or anti-government nut?

C. If any person knowingly possesses any firearm designed or intended to expel a projectile by action of an explosion of a combustible material within the building of a child day center or public, private, or religious preschool, elementary, middle, or high school and intends to use, or attempts to use, such firearm, or displays such weapon in a threatening manner, such person is guilty of a Class 6 felony and sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of five years to be served consecutively with any other sentence.

There is no proof that he intended to use such firearm or displayed such weapon in a threatening manner.

His weapons never left his vehicle.

He only asked to use the restroom.

False arrest, large lawsuit.
 
I assume the police who made the arrest know the law. Are you suggesting they don't?

that's a stupid assed assumption, given that the SCOTUS has opined that police officers may make mistakes of law and retain qualified immunity. most police officers do NOT know all the laws. are you suggesting that they do?
 
that's a stupid assed assumption, given that the SCOTUS has opined that police officers may make mistakes of law and retain qualified immunity. most police officers do NOT know all the laws. are you suggesting that they do?

Well, turns out that is the law. What a shock. You look like a complete buffoon. Again. Congrats.
 

about time you posted the law, or at least the link to it. Now, lets give you an education on the law..............

E. The exemptions set out in §§ 18.2-308 and 18.2-308.016 shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to the provisions of this section. The provisions of this section shall not apply to (i) persons who possess such weapon or weapons as a part of the school's curriculum or activities; (ii) a person possessing a knife customarily used for food preparation or service and using it for such purpose; (iii) persons who possess such weapon or weapons as a part of any program sponsored or facilitated by either the school or any organization authorized by the school to conduct its programs either on or off the school premises; (iv) any law-enforcement officer, or retired law-enforcement officer qualified pursuant to subsection C of § 18.2-308.016; (v) any person who possesses a knife or blade which he uses customarily in his trade; (vi) a person who possesses an unloaded firearm or a stun weapon that is in a closed container, or a knife having a metal blade, in or upon a motor vehicle, or an unloaded shotgun or rifle in a firearms rack in or upon a motor vehicle; (vii) a person who has a valid concealed handgun permit and possesses a concealed handgun or a stun weapon while in a motor vehicle in a parking lot, traffic circle, or other means of vehicular ingress or egress to the school; (viii) a school security officer authorized to carry a firearm pursuant to § 22.1-280.2:1; or (ix) an armed security officer, licensed pursuant to Article 4 (§ 9.1-138 et seq.) of Chapter 1 of Title 9.1, hired by a child day center or a private or religious school for the protection of students and employees as authorized by such school. For the purposes of this subsection, "weapon" includes a knife having a metal blade of three inches or longer and "closed container" includes a locked vehicle trunk.

F. Nothing in subsection E or any other provision of law shall be construed as providing an exemption to the provisions of this section for a special conservator of the peace appointed pursuant to § 19.2-13, other than the specifically enumerated exemptions that apply to the general population as provided in subsection E.

G. As used in this section:

"Child day center" means a child day center, as defined in § 22.1-289.02, that is licensed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 14.1 (§ 22.1-289.02 et seq.) of Title 22.1 and is not operated at the residence of the provider or of any of the children.

"Stun weapon" means any device that emits a momentary or pulsed output, which is electrical, audible, optical or electromagnetic in nature and which is designed to temporarily incapacitate a person.

1979, c. 467; 1988, c. 493; 1990, cc. 635, 744; 1991, c. 579; 1992, cc. 727, 735; 1995, c. 511; 1999, cc. 587, 829, 846; 2001, c. 403; 2003, cc. 619, 976; 2004, cc. 128, 461; 2005, cc. 830, 928; 2007, c. 519; 2011, c. 282; 2013, c. 416; 2015, c. 289; 2016, c. 257; 2017, c. 311; 2020, cc. 693, 1037, 1249.

These 'exemptions' are laid out as 'defenses to prosecution', meaning that you can use these exemptions as a defense at your prosecution......you do know what that means, right?
 
Well, turns out that is the law. What a shock. You look like a complete buffoon. Again. Congrats.

sure I do LOL.......turns out you don't know the laws, you can only copy and paste, making you look like a complete buffoon, again.

you could do yourself a real solid by just acknowledging that I know the laws and you don't. That is probably a bridge too far for someone of your ego, though.
 
sure I do LOL.......turns out you don't know the laws, you can only copy and paste, making you look like a complete buffoon, again.

you could do yourself a real solid by just acknowledging that I know the laws and you don't. That is probably a bridge too far for someone of your ego, though.

What is the conceal carry law in Minnesota?
 
about time you posted the law, or at least the link to it. Now, lets give you an education on the law..............

E. The exemptions set out in §§ 18.2-308 and 18.2-308.016 shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to the provisions of this section. The provisions of this section shall not apply to (i) persons who possess such weapon or weapons as a part of the school's curriculum or activities; (ii) a person possessing a knife customarily used for food preparation or service and using it for such purpose; (iii) persons who possess such weapon or weapons as a part of any program sponsored or facilitated by either the school or any organization authorized by the school to conduct its programs either on or off the school premises; (iv) any law-enforcement officer, or retired law-enforcement officer qualified pursuant to subsection C of § 18.2-308.016; (v) any person who possesses a knife or blade which he uses customarily in his trade; (vi) a person who possesses an unloaded firearm or a stun weapon that is in a closed container, or a knife having a metal blade, in or upon a motor vehicle, or an unloaded shotgun or rifle in a firearms rack in or upon a motor vehicle; (vii) a person who has a valid concealed handgun permit and possesses a concealed handgun or a stun weapon while in a motor vehicle in a parking lot, traffic circle, or other means of vehicular ingress or egress to the school; (viii) a school security officer authorized to carry a firearm pursuant to § 22.1-280.2:1; or (ix) an armed security officer, licensed pursuant to Article 4 (§ 9.1-138 et seq.) of Chapter 1 of Title 9.1, hired by a child day center or a private or religious school for the protection of students and employees as authorized by such school. For the purposes of this subsection, "weapon" includes a knife having a metal blade of three inches or longer and "closed container" includes a locked vehicle trunk.

F. Nothing in subsection E or any other provision of law shall be construed as providing an exemption to the provisions of this section for a special conservator of the peace appointed pursuant to § 19.2-13, other than the specifically enumerated exemptions that apply to the general population as provided in subsection E.

G. As used in this section:

"Child day center" means a child day center, as defined in § 22.1-289.02, that is licensed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 14.1 (§ 22.1-289.02 et seq.) of Title 22.1 and is not operated at the residence of the provider or of any of the children.

"Stun weapon" means any device that emits a momentary or pulsed output, which is electrical, audible, optical or electromagnetic in nature and which is designed to temporarily incapacitate a person.

1979, c. 467; 1988, c. 493; 1990, cc. 635, 744; 1991, c. 579; 1992, cc. 727, 735; 1995, c. 511; 1999, cc. 587, 829, 846; 2001, c. 403; 2003, cc. 619, 976; 2004, cc. 128, 461; 2005, cc. 830, 928; 2007, c. 519; 2011, c. 282; 2013, c. 416; 2015, c. 289; 2016, c. 257; 2017, c. 311; 2020, cc. 693, 1037, 1249.

These 'exemptions' are laid out as 'defenses to prosecution', meaning that you can use these exemptions as a defense at your prosecution......you do know what that means, right?

So if one of those apply, he will get off. But they don't. Doesn't matter. He was arrested on a felony charge. Which is exactly what I said. YOU FUCKING LOSER.
 
I assume the police who made the arrest know the law. Are you suggesting they don't?

Police often don't know all the laws on their state's (or federal) books. How long do you think it would take them to memorize all of them?
 
So if one of those apply, he will get off. But they don't. Doesn't matter. He was arrested on a felony charge. Which is exactly what I said. YOU FUCKING LOSER.

what specific information do you have that says none of these exemptions apply??????

(vi) a person who possesses an unloaded firearm or a stun weapon that is in a closed container, or a knife having a metal blade, in or upon a motor vehicle, or an unloaded shotgun or rifle in a firearms rack in or upon a motor vehicle;

so now you want to backtrack and just admit he was arrested on a felony charge instead of acknowledging that 1. you don't know the laws, and 2. that cops make mistakes.............

and you call me the loser ROFL
 
Police often don't know all the laws on their state's (or federal) books. How long do you think it would take them to memorize all of them?

I don't have to. You know, I have the google machine. He was arrested for a felony. You want to get in on this now too? ROTFLMFAO!!! Not very smart, are you hot rod?
 
what specific information do you have that says none of these exemptions apply??????

(vi) a person who possesses an unloaded firearm or a stun weapon that is in a closed container, or a knife having a metal blade, in or upon a motor vehicle, or an unloaded shotgun or rifle in a firearms rack in or upon a motor vehicle;

so now you want to backtrack and just admit he was arrested on a felony charge instead of acknowledging that 1. you don't know the laws, and 2. that cops make mistakes.............

and you call me the loser ROFL

What is Connecticut law governing firearms in a motor vehicle?
 
what specific information do you have that says none of these exemptions apply??????

(vi) a person who possesses an unloaded firearm or a stun weapon that is in a closed container, or a knife having a metal blade, in or upon a motor vehicle, or an unloaded shotgun or rifle in a firearms rack in or upon a motor vehicle;

so now you want to backtrack and just admit he was arrested on a felony charge instead of acknowledging that 1. you don't know the laws, and 2. that cops make mistakes.............

and you call me the loser ROFL

Yes, none of those apply. You should read the fucking article so you don't look like a complete dipshit.
 
Yes, none of those apply. You should read the fucking article so you don't look like a complete dipshit.

the article doesn't indicate information that you apparently think you have............so all you are doing is doubling down on your stubborn ignorance, making you look like a complete dipshit who is pissed off that you got beat about the head and shoulders with real law...................sad for you
 
the article doesn't indicate information that you apparently think you have............so all you are doing is doubling down on your stubborn ignorance, making you look like a complete dipshit who is pissed off that you got beat about the head and shoulders with real law...................sad for you

What evidence do you have that any of them do apply. Most are obvious. The weapons were not locked in a case. That's the last one. Are you really this fucking retarded, or is it an act?
 
I don't have to. You know, I have the google machine. He was arrested for a felony. You want to get in on this now too? ROTFLMFAO!!! Not very smart, are you hot rod?

You don't have to...what?

It is sad where this country has gone from when we could leave our guns in our cars in the school parking lot to go hunting after school to where you leftists have taken it today.
 
What evidence do you have that any of them do apply. Most are obvious. The weapons were not locked in a case. That's the last one. Are you really this fucking retarded, or is it an act?

the article doesn't state, does it? and a locked trunk has ALWAYS been considered a locked case.

so all you are doing right now is desperately holding on to hope that you are right and i'm wrong.........which is clearly not the case here.
 
Back
Top