Papadopoulos Urged to Withdraw Guilty Plea – Was Set Up By Deep State Spies

Darth Omar said:
Which witnesses, who attended the meeting, testified that it was about stolen emails?
Click to expand...

Notice this goalpost shift here.

Well, Uday and Hope Hicks both provided false statements to Congress saying the meeting was about "adoptions". We know that's not what the meeting was about because we have Goldstone and Uday's e-mails.
 
LV426 said:
What assertion specifically, would you like proof of? I'm happy to link to all the points in the below, though the question is whether or not you're adult enough to admit you're full of shit.




What hasn't been proven? What are you talking about? This is exactly what I was talking about in the post you responded to; how your strategy seems to be blanket denial and obfuscation. So lazy. No work ethic at all. Totally reflective of your poor abilities and poor skills as a human being.





The financial crimes provide the motive for why Manafort did what he did; he sold out this nation to oligarchs because he wanted to make money and live a lavish lifestyle. So that's why he conspired with Russia; he was broke and needed money and Russia was happy to provide it and help him launder it.
Click to expand...

Still waiting for proof of everything you claimed.
 
LV426 said:
Yeah. They lied about the meeting being about "adoptions". Now they're saying the meeting was to get dirt on Clinton.

So....

At first, Trump denied anyone had any contacts with Russia
Then, Trump dictated a memo that the meeting at Trump Tower in June 2016 was about "adoptions"
Now, they're saying the meeting was to get dirt on Clinton, but not to concern ourselves with it because nothing came from it, so they say.

So why should we trust them when they say nothing came from the meeting they first denied ever happened, then said was about "adoptions"?
Click to expand...

It was about adoptions. Putin adopted Trump at that meeting. Trump has been his fanboy ever since.
 
LV426 said:
LOL!

You're here arguing that the meeting was a "nothingburger" because nothing came of it. And I'm not sure why you think that when, a few weeks after the meeting, the subject of that meeting (hacked e-mails) were dumped by Wikileaks during the Democratic Convention, when they would do the most damage to the party's unity.

So now your position was that the Trump Tower meeting was about "adoptions"? You know that it wasn't, right?
Click to expand...

A failed crime is still a crime. If you try to rob a bank and get stopped, they don't just hand wave it away. It is a crime.
 
Last edited:
LV426 said:
What claim specifically?

I think you're just being lazy now because you don't want to admit you're full of shit and have been this entire time.
Click to expand...

Where is any evidence Trump colluded with Russia? 18 months and still zero evidence from the Mullet team.
 
LV426 said:
Yeah. They lied about the meeting being about "adoptions". Now they're saying the meeting was to get dirt on Clinton.

So....

At first, Trump denied anyone had any contacts with Russia
Then, Trump dictated a memo that the meeting at Trump Tower in June 2016 was about "adoptions"
Now, they're saying the meeting was to get dirt on Clinton, but not to concern ourselves with it because nothing came from it, so they say.

So why should we trust them when they say nothing came from the meeting they first denied ever happened, then said was about "adoptions"?
Click to expand...

Your wires are badly crossed on this.

That Junior intended to receive dirt on Clinton and the meeting being about adoption aren’t mutually exclusive concepts. That’s why I have ALWAYS contended the meeting was about adoption—and I still do. Obviously, Junior was going to enquire about the dirt—you can basically assume that, since he thought dirt would be the topic.

Junior even had his secretary call him out of the meeting since it was wasting his time. It certainly sounds like a meeting about adoption.

Your conspiracy theories, not withstanding.
 
Darth Omar said:
Your wires are badly crossed on this.

That Junior intended to receive dirt on Clinton and the meeting being about adoption aren’t mutually exclusive concepts. That’s why I have ALWAYS contended the meeting was about adoption—and I still do. Obviously, Junior was going to enquire about the dirt—you can basically assume that, since he thought dirt would be the topic.

Junior even had his secretary call him out of the meeting since it was wasting his time. It certainly sounds like a meeting about adoption.

Your conspiracy theories, not withstanding.
Click to expand...

The meeting was about adoption to the Russians.

The meeting was about dirt to Junior.

Only the latter matters. That’s where the law was violated.
 
Irish said:
Where is any evidence Trump colluded with Russia?
Click to expand...

The June 2016 Trump Tower meeting set up by Uday to get illegally hacked e-mails on Clinton and to strategize their release. Trump then dictated a letter claiming the meeting was about "adoptions", and Uday gave a false statement to Congress when he claimed the meeting was about "adoptions".

So right there is collusion and Obstruction of Justice.
 
I have not seen any direct evidence that Clump is guilty regarding the Russian meetings, but I have seen plenty that Junior was.

I am feeling fairly sure Jr. will be indicted. Rumps reaction will be priceless. Pop some corn.
 
Darth Omar said:
Your wires are badly crossed on this.
Click to expand...

Nope. I'm crystal clear on what happened.

  • Y'all lied and said no one had any contact with Russia
  • Then y'all said the contact was about "adoptions"
  • Now y'all are saying it was to get stolen e-mails on Clinton, but nothing came of it even though those e-mails were dumped a few weeks after the Trump Tower meeting, during the Democratic Convention.
You all have been lying about Russia from the start, denying any contact, then walking that back to try and persuade others to think the contact y'all had -contact y'all denied at the start- wasn't illicit, when it obviously was.
 
Darth Omar said:
That Junior intended to receive dirt on Clinton and the meeting being about adoption aren’t mutually exclusive concepts
Click to expand...

The meeting wasn't about adoption, and we know that because of the e-mail exchange between Goldstone and Uday.

Stop lying, it's making you look worse. You don't have to cover for them; you don't owe them anything.
 
Darth Omar said:
That’s why I have ALWAYS contended the meeting was about adoption—and I still do.
Click to expand...

Well that's because you're an idiot who believes liars.

Adoptions never came up in any of the e-mails between Goldstone and Uday.

The "adoption" thing became the excuse after everyone found out about the meeting Trump tried to keep secret. That's why he personally dictated a memo explaining the meeting, which was about stolen e-mails per the exchange between Goldstone and Uday, was about "adoptions".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top