Palin's hypocrisy!

Yurt said:
you're a liar dixie, i've changed my stance about one issue my whole time on this board and that is health care and when obama and the dems starting trashing the bill, i withdrew my support....and even if i had changed my mind about a couple more issues, so what? lord forbid i think for myself....you're just a partisan hack that can't think for himself, if rush stopped his show, we would probably never see you again. i come here to debate and listen to all ideas, i don't come here to shit on everyone like you and never, ever admit you're wrong even when your errors and lies are right in front of your face, you're still deny it.

i would ask you to prove your allegations, but i've been down that road with you before and you never do, because you know you're a liar....then again pointing out that you're a liar is like saying the sun is going to rise tomorrow....
Click to expand...

Yeah, that's right, I have nothing better to do in my life than come here and spread lies about an insignificant two-faced idiot. If you want to convince yourself that your pandering to leftist nitwits is "thinking for yourself" that's fine, people justify their stupidity all the time. You don't come here to debate and hear all sides of the issues, or else that is what I would see from you! Instead, we see you come here and join the libtards in their little Palin bashfest, because you've "thought" about it, and find yourself in agreement with pinhead morons!

You can now try to turn the worm and make this conversation about me, but it's about you, buddy, and I've nailed your ass. You know it, you don't like it, and I certainly understand, but I stand by every word I said. You are a pathetic self-absorbed shit-for-brains who can't decide if he's liberal, conservative, moderate, or all of the above! The reason you are so convoluted is because you are confused. I don't blame you, I would be too!

I could help you with your confusion, but it would require you to be a real "free thinker" and listen to what I had to say, and you aren't going to do that. I could explain how you need to decide if you favor elites on both sides continuing to run our country into the dirt, or if you would prefer to restore power to the people of the United States, pursuant to the Constitution, and how it should have always been. But like I said, you don't want to listen, you want to hoot me down. I'm one of those people!
 
Yurt said:
bravo and dixie, you two need to lighten up. you're way to defensive of palin. i and others are entitled to their opinion about paliin writing on her hand, the very fact you say other people don't mind and then blast my opinion shows you're both acting like partisan hacks. it was a stupid move, deal with it.

go ahead and support her dixie, i will not and all your immature cries that i'm a liberal will not benefit the republican party. i vote for who and what i believe, not what partisan hacks like you tell me i should believe.
Click to expand...

dude....right now no one is running for president.....at the moment, isn't it enough that she annoys liberals to the point of distraction?......
 
Damocles said:
I think this is weak. What about one that needs to write it down on a teleprompter to get through a press conference? Writing down points that you want to ensure you hit during a speech that you are going to give prompterless, and without notes (should have been done on cards) is certainly well within what almost any politician does on a regular basis. Of course most of them would use cards on a lectern, but heck... Sometimes you make do with what is on hand at the moment.
Click to expand...

I don't think that Obama uses a teleprompter during press conferences. Speeches yes, but press conferences? not so much.

I just think that the four points she wrote down were so simplistic that it was remarkable that she needed to have them written on her hand. It was one small step above having her NAME written there to insure she wouldn't forget THAT.
 
maineman said:
he didn't use a teleprompter when he schooled the house republicans for an hour and a half.
Click to expand...

not to mention the fact he didn't school the Republicans....he came with his hat in his hand begging them to reconsider their position and fall in love with him like the liberals did.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
not to mention the fact he didn't school the Republicans....he came with his hat in his hand begging them to reconsider their position and fall in love with him like the liberals did.....
Click to expand...

this response from you prooves that if you pour enough koolaid down someone, they'll buy any amount of spin.

bottoms up, pmp!:clink:
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol....not so much....just a little.....not a whole lot...well maybe sometimes.....infrequently.....
Click to expand...

explain how a teleprompter would work in a press conference format? no one knows for sure what any reportere is gtoing to ask, and no one knows what his or her follow up questions might be... how do you script and project answers to questions in an unscripted event when you don't know the questions?
 
maineman said:
explain how a teleprompter would work in a press conference format? no one knows for sure what any reportere is gtoing to ask, and no one knows what his or her follow up questions might be... how do you script and project answers to questions in an unscripted event when you don't know the questions?
Click to expand...
Ask Obama, he uses it. First the Press made a big deal because they couldn't take pictures because his prompter was in the way, then the President tried using a big screen at the back of the room.

My guess is that somebody in the back has a list of pre-prepared "answers" for "expected" questions and can put it up whenever somebody asks one of those expected questions. Or they expect him to fill in with Uh-k-k-k-k-k-k-kk-k-k-k-k-k-k-k, until the focus group comes up with the best response and it gets typed in real time.
 
Damocles said:
Ask Obama, he uses it. First the Press made a big deal because they couldn't take pictures because his prompter was in the way, then the President tried using a big screen at the back of the room.

My guess is that somebody in the back has a list of pre-prepared "answers" for "expected" questions and can put it up whenever somebody asks one of those expected questions. Or they expect him to fill in with Uh-k-k-k-k-k-k-kk-k-k-k-k-k-k-k, until the focus group comes up with the best response and it gets typed in real time.
Click to expand...

Personally I dont give a crap if the message is on someone's hand or on a teleprompter.

I just find it funny that those who support GWB make fun of Obama for the ocasional "um".

I also find it funny that those who attack President Obama for teleprompter use, defend Palin for writing on her hand.

It was kinda amusing to see Palin resort to a method I have not used since the 6th grade, but I dont see it as a reflection of her intelegence. THere is plenty of evidence of her intelegence from other sources.

I belive it appears kind of weak, imagine a president speaking to a forign assembly of lawmakers with notes written on her hand!
 
Damocles said:
Ask Obama, he uses it. First the Press made a big deal because they couldn't take pictures because his prompter was in the way, then the President tried using a big screen at the back of the room.

My guess is that somebody in the back has a list of pre-prepared "answers" for "expected" questions and can put it up whenever somebody asks one of those expected questions. Or they expect him to fill in with Uh-k-k-k-k-k-k-kk-k-k-k-k-k-k-k, until the focus group comes up with the best response and it gets typed in real time.
Click to expand...

Look at President Obama's Q&A with R's from a couple weeks ago, those questions were very detailed, no answers on a teleprompter for that... He did an AWSOME job, so good the R's are refusing to do it again!
 
Jarod said:
Personally I dont give a crap if the message is on someone's hand or on a teleprompter.

I just find it funny that those who support GWB make fun of Obama for the ocasional "um".

I also find it funny that those who attack President Obama for teleprompter use, defend Palin for writing on her hand.

It was kinda amusing to see Palin resort to a method I have not used since the 6th grade, but I dont see it as a reflection of her intelegence. THere is plenty of evidence of her intelegence from other sources.

I belive it appears kind of weak, imagine a president speaking to a forign assembly of lawmakers with notes written on her hand!
Click to expand...

You seriously equate 4 words written on your hand to a tele-prompter ?

Do you even know what a teleprompter is....? Apparently not.

Look Mushroom, with a teleprompter you can recite the encyclopedia word for word...that hardly compares to 4 words written on a palm...moron.

and please, get a damn "spell checker for idiots"
 
bravo said:
You seriously equate 4 words written on your hand to a tele-prompter ?

Do you even know what a teleprompter is....? Apparently not.

Look Mushroom, with a teleprompter you can recite the encyclopedia word for word...that hardly compares to 4 words written on a palm...moron.

and please, get a damn "spell checker for idiots"
Click to expand...

She had a prepared text on paper directly in front of her and basically read it.... did you see the speach?
 
Jarod said:
I just find it funny that those who support GWB make fun of Obama for the ocasional "um".
Click to expand...

you have only yourself to blame....you sold us Obama with the sale's pitch that he wasn't Bush......instead you should have said the guy who operates his teleprompter wasn't Bush......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
you have only yourself to blame....you sold us Obama with the sale's pitch that he wasn't Bush......instead you should have said the guy who operates his teleprompter wasn't Bush......
Click to expand...

Ha, Bush used a teleprompter operated by the exact same people.

President Obama IS NOT BUSH, by a long shot!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top